Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Negative Inductance and measure of Magnetic force.

Started by synchro1, November 19, 2017, 08:20:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

synchro1

Hob Nilre demonstrated how magnet field attraction strength is directly proportional to copper mass. Twice the copper mass yields the same magnet strength for half the input or twice the magnet strength for the same input. Joe Newman took full advantage of this principle when he built "Big Eureka". The problem with Newman's motor design is firstly; The rotor magnet size is restricted by the space inside the coil core.

The masking strength of a neutralization coil has the same ratio of copper mass to input and magnet strength, however, the external solenoid piston can be any size!

Generating output from a separate solenoid coil with a larger then "Newman Rotor" dimension stack of magnets piston in a masking oscillator could be any size. Secondly, the output would be pure sine wave A.C. with no need for a commutator with "Back Spike Gap".


synchro1

Here's a picture of what I believe to be an "Overunity Attraction Neutralization Alternator Oscillator": The D.C. fan commutator weeds the 18% of "Backspike" out and returns the regauging output to the source capacitor through a diode from the electro magnet masking coil.

The bifilar output coil on the left houses the lower stack of ceramic rings that are designed to oscillate in the core. This output passes through a FWBR and feeds the same source capacitor as the EM masking coil overhead.

synchro1

Here' a picture of an attraction motor rotor I built with an elongated arm for testing, and a bifilar ferrite core masking coil with backing magnets on the commutator fan. Works well enough. I plan to test a short arm tomorrow!

synchro1

The 800% Adams "Attraction Masking" motor generator. Here's a link to this highly informative PDF http://www.free-energy-info.com/Video...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2bPDDWqSvM

The latching Reed switch commutator D.C. fan substitutes for both Adams output coils and his optic-utter commutator.

synchro1

I plan to add a four way cross connector to the rotor, shorten the arms and double the reed switch trigger magnets along with a second magnet backed masking coil. Connecting the two coils through the commutator would complete this improved and modified "Adams Attraction Motor Generator". The extra torque and output is a result of the backing magnets, and the D.C. fan is a Tesla induction motor that acts as a very efficient generator. The other feature is the monococque latching reed switch commutator. These three simple construction improvements add increased power and efficiency to the Adams design. A well designed motor generator. Plus look at all the test results we're supplied by Adams to help.


One other point; The electro-magnet is only good for the oscillator because the metal rim of the pot transformer is magnetic and cogs the rotor. The power source needs to run the D.C. fan as a commutator, but the basic design would be identical.