Successfully looped SMOT

[synchro1]

Syncro


Strait up


whats that a dozen or two unanswered calls from you to TinselKoala with mixed in name calling and innuendos...
including responses he made to Smoky2 which you twisted to imply you were being addressed??


you got something to share ?
share it .


it should not need the eyes of TK to show it has merit  ?


running around with Gasoline trying to restart old flame wars here will not go well.

@Ramset,

My inquiries to Tinselkoala  don't concern you. SmOky2 runs this thread not you. SmOky2 believes my topic is germaine to the thread. You want to grant TinselKoala sanctuary in your bell tower of Notre Dame. Just butt out. TK is a chronic cynic and needs to be hassled back for hassling smOky2. Whatever you do, I'm warni9ng you; Do not bother Stephan Hartiberlin with your censorship issue.

[ramset]

Allen
Quote
@Ramset,[/size]My inquiries to him don't concern you. SmOky2 runs this thread not you. SmOky2 believes my topic[size=78%] is germaine to the thread. You want to grant TinselKoala sanctuary in your bell tower of Notre Dame. Just butt out. TK is a chronic cynic and needs to be hassled back for hassling smOky2. Whatever you do, I'm warni9ng you; Do not bother Stephan Hartiberlin with your censorship issue.[size=78%]


end quote

@ Synchro
I speak with Smoky all the time


he does not need support from you or be associated with your taunting or threatening  flame war methods [which are not allowed here.


you will not get a response  from TinselKoala  , but you will get a response from administration if you threaten or taunt


your claims should stand on merit .


I know of no one here who understands your claims ?


respectfully
Chet K

[synchro1]

Allen
Quote
@Ramset,[/size]My inquiries to him don't concern you. SmOky2 runs this thread not you. SmOky2 believes my topic[size=78%] is germaine to the thread. You want to grant TinselKoala sanctuary in your bell tower of Notre Dame. Just butt out. TK is a chronic cynic and needs to be hassled back for hassling smOky2. Whatever you do, I'm warni9ng you; Do not bother Stephan Hartiberlin with your censorship issue.[size=78%]


end quote

@ Synchro
I speak with Smoky all the time


he does not need support from you or be associated with your taunting or threatening  flame war methods [which are not allowed here.


you will not get a response  from TinselKoala  , but you will get a response from administration if you threaten or taunt


your claims should stand on merit .




I know of no one here who understands your claims ?


respectfully
Chet K

@ramset,

You asked me to show something. I uploaded at least a hundred build videos over the past six months while you uploaded zero. Maybe you're the one who should show something for a change. The other thing is; You violated my copyright by falsely and indiscriminately adding a bold case to my comment without my permission. That amounts to a shameless act of forgery.

You state you don't know of anyone who can understand my claims; Yet you allege you speak with smOky2 all the time. Are you including smOky2 in you group of know nothings?

[ramset]

Synchro

I don't make videos,nor do I make claims.

and ATM I am quite busy .

people really get the ten foot pole out when you start threatening and trying to scream your way thru a claim


I for one would greatly appreciate understanding what your claim actually means in the real world ??
however
since you always refuse to start a new topic and instead start flame wars in other peoples topics [what you are doing here right now]

maybe it'll take another five to ten years while you fight over Words and terms in Smoky's thread.

I must tell you ,if you are trying to start your flame war all over again...

that would be a really Bad option [as opposed to just explaining your claim in a dedicated thread].

Chet
PS
I will not respond here again in Smoky's SMOT thread ,he is very busy with this topic and honestly does not need to get pulled into your attempts at taunting and threatening  members here.

it never ends well , please do something to change that

start your own topic and make a claim which people understand [without all the threats

[sm0ky2]

I don't "run" anything.
I am not a moderator
I did not create this thread


And for the record, your device is (in my opinion) completely off topic.


The original video was presumed to have been edited
to look like a successful looped SMOT.
and if that is the case, the hoaxer doesn't know how close he really is.


I am simply accepting a challenge (to possibly win a cheeseburger)
And to prove the point that it is possible and has been done way before me.
and to teach people how to do it as I demonstrate the key magnetic principles
of this and almost all other permanent magnet gates.


Now we are going to employ one of Albert Einstein's favorite scientific methods.
A thought experiment


Think about gravity as being a diplolar field like magnetism.


But more explicitly, scattered like an unmagnetized ferrous material.
so that the field is incoherent, or degaussed.
and in this form, it attracts to the gravitational field of everything
and in this form, we have gravity and anti-gravity mixed and equally
scattered, such that there is no discernible polarity.


the potential gradient is unidirectional, always attracting.
the way magnets attract iron


now think of magnetism as having a bipolar potential field.
so that through a series of hills and valleys, there is a potential
gradient, both up the hill and down it.
Like if we 'magnetized' a gravitational source (mass)
and oriented the polarity.


and we have 2 equations, not just one.
E=mBd(north)
E=mBd(south)


Or for gravity
E=mgh(down)
E=mgh(up)


Now because our gravitational field is incoherent
or unpolarized
"up" and "down" are both towards the source
so there is only E=mgh


But for our magnetism,
we have a potential at a distance from north
and a potential at a distance from south
the direction of force (attract or repel) is dependent
upon the orientation of the dipole.


if we polarize our gravity, we will still only have down.
Because we didn't polarize the other gravitational source
it is only when two gravitational dipoles interact
that we can have an "up" force, or a gravitational repulsion.
For this reason, "anti-gravity" cannot exist on Earth.


For our magnets:
We have a magnetic potential energy at any distance greater than 0
For attraction


And at any distance less than infinity
For repulsion


Now consider 3 magnets in series, at some distance apart
We have a force in the center magnet in both directions
Our center magnet, being a dipole itself,
has its' south attracted by a north
and its' north attracted by a south
(for now we will dismiss the open ends of the outer 2)


To the center magnet, either direction is downhill
and uphill from the perspective of the other.


at a point between them, the net force is 0
but there is still force.
the equivalent of pressure.
but in only two vectors
equal, and opposite


On either side of this point, the force is greater
towards that side.
If free to move, the magnet will decrease in
magnetic potential energy from one pole
while increasing magnetic potential energy from the other


The force increases with a decrease in distance
this process is similar to gravity
in that the energy required to "lift" it back towards
the 0-point, is equal to the energy gained as it fell.


So this magnet, at the 0-point
while it has no net force in either direction
is at the maximum potential energy state
of the system


by decreasing the distance between the center magnet
and both poles simultaneously
we are increasing the pressure
while lowering the potential energy
and we change the vector of the force
by 90-degrees to both poles.


this is exactly the same as simply orienting the poles 90-degrees


https://youtu.be/o6F9I5OiSTE