user TURBO?s replication of Steven Mark?s TPU ?

[turbo]

Marco, it is not gentlemanly to call someone wrong without explaining where they are wrong.

You said:

now when we look at the name of the device, tesla's magnifying transmitter, and we wonder why he called it this way , the awnser would be simple.

it's because the reciever puts out more energy then is deliverd to the tranmitter.

so basicly we can say that a tesla magnifying transmitter in proper operation is an overunity device.

[/b]

Wrong, wrong, and wrong again.

Tesla named his transmitter a magnifying transmitter because it magnifies voltage not power. In the same way a magnifying lens can make an image larger or a transmission can increase speed (not power). The amount of solar energy arriving at a lens and the amount focused to a point is exactly the same (minus losses) The Tesla coil is a resonant transmission line and obeys all the standard rules for transmission lines including increasing voltage at resonance at the open end and (clue) at the driven end

You have been reading too much Konstantin Meyl. His work can be debunked in short order. He makes obvious and serious mistakes in confusing the voltage (or brightness) of the LED's with real power.

Now don't get me wrong, I think it's fine that Konstantin Meyl makes a living selling demonstrater kits (he sells for $$$$)  that involve transmitting RF power. When he claims more real power arrives at the reciever than is output at the transmittrer (as witnessed by his LED's) he is making a very serious power measurement error. He gets around this with many disclaimers in meylkit.pdf.

If his work was real and Marco's last statement is true, we should all easily have free energy and the hunt is over.

Marco, where is your overunity device, it should be easy from your above statements, neophyte!

I have attached the meylkit.pdf for others to read. Let's see how many bright people can spot the errors. I will post later.

well sparkman ,
Do you think it's gentlemany to call someone faulty without ever having a clue of whats going on and therefore publishing wrong explenations because you think you know it all?

However finally an intresting respond from you.
But you are wrong again.

i will explain:

The tesla MT , the meyl kit , with it's very serious power measurement error is still not tuned to the cosmos.

you just don't seem to get the idea of the whole thing.

which is finally suceed in tapping nature sources.....

If we suceed this will ALWAYS RESULT IN OVERUNITY

Yet instead of adding important information to this devellopment with your " scientific brain " you decide to pollute this topic with telling you know how everything works, not realizing you are terrible wrong.

What is wrong with folowing the experiments of the geniouses from the past and sharing your findings, rebuilding their experimental setups ,continuing their work?

Really dude, whats your problem?

[turbo]

Hi Turbo,

Is it:
The HT is created by a TV HT transformer that has an inbuilt diode and will create a high voltage  DC field (25,000 volts) around the aluminium sheet.

This must then somehow concentrate the background pulsing logitudinal waves towards the aluminium sphere.
The pancake coils at the bottom set up a tuned resonating circuit with the background energy and the iron wire on the upright pillar forms the collector coil.
The charge built up in the coil must be some kind of AC (reference to bird landing on the wire) and this is used to light the lamp.
I would say that the power used by the TV HT coil was less than 75 watts, a lot less.
After all, it is only a DC field, it is not doing any work that I can think of.

If I didn't know any better then I would say that there is a lot of similarities between this and the Thesta Distatica.
That used rotating acrylic disks to create the HV DC, and the rest Turbo already has working.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testatika
Whats the bet that this (Testatika) operates on a resonating frequency of 7.8Hz

Regards

Rob

hi, rob

thank you for responding.

i will explain:

in a grounded circuit all voltage potentials will normally  "leak" away towards ground.

Ground is assumed negative.

a few post back i explaind i turned the normal system up side down.
The upper aluminium sphere is a highly negative (independant from earth) floating ground...

in one of my experiments i noticed sparks flying off my fingers to a negative terminal without feeling a shock....this made me think.

Ground itself can become positive , depending on its opposite.
actually i don't like the word ground anymore but by lack of finding a better description i leave it that way.

i think in terms like : " earth ground " , " setup ground " , " local ground " , " temporairy ground " , " switching ground " etc..

now those are quite a few competly diffrent things.

imagine happens when there is a point were we have more independent grounds, if the charges differ one of them has to be called "positive" .

my living room looks a bit like a giant cold vacuum tube.

Turbo

[sparkman]

people get what they deserve.

[boxofsparks]

Hi There
Been following this for some time now  and thought I would relate some info that may or may not help, but will indeed supply  food for thought.  A gentleman  I work  with was  in charge of R&D for a company useing higher voltage DC batteries systems. The charger for these used a Toroid 110/220 to 96/136 out. Bridge from there to the batts. They had to add a resistor from a second AC feed to be applied prior to full AC powerup to keep the inrush from popping the breaker "Sometimes" ps: ...no DC load... A toroid guru was consulted and said this was normal because the transformer  was trying catch up to the stage of  the phase already present in the transformer.  "Oh ya we had to do that in the hospitals too, just a weird thing about some of our toroids". Well to me it sounds like this Toroid had continued to "run" to remember its Phase after having AC removed.  I am trying to get a hold of that specific toroid, dont know yet. Just an interesting thing I thought I would pass on.  I am working on one now I will pass on any  results.

[turbo]

In response to post 85 from Marco

As a matter of fact, yes Mr. Marco, especially when that someone has been as misleading, cryptic and fraudulent as you have been.

You prop yourself on paper mache pillars and act too important for your britches.

And you lead people to spend good money on worthless baby Tesla coil kits that brag of free energy. This money can be better spent on their children.

Grow up Mr. Marco, and learn how to debate your opponent skillfully or give up and climb back into your hole.

Your beard has been pulled off! Neophyte!

sorry, i don't have a beard....

when did i tell anyone to spend money? 

i could type a bunch more , but you are just not worth it
i can use the energy and time to go on with my coils.