12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[spinn_MP]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ajc6hzY-XXU
over unity sure!

Sure, sure... 

BTW, the video is showing the most inefficient "OU" device I managed to see over the last few years...

AAaah.....I mean, really?

[Cloxxki]

Sure??

I can make a device from a few elastics bands and random weights and rods which will move much more unpredictably, for a longer period of time, and it onl needs a tap of my finger to set it off. Yet, it will not be OU either.
There is so much we could calculate. But only the one interpreting the data can make the righ tor wrong assumption.
We as human used to think human eyes were the lights that made things visible. For when they were closed, we could not see further than the insides of our eye lids.
And we believed the earth was flat and quite huge, because hoever far we'd dare to travel, we'd never roll of drift off it.

Is the Milkovic camp delisional, or disinfo agents? Or perhaps, they are holding back their best (and only significant) work?

[Alexioco]

Its quite clear that the pendulum is independent from the lever, it retains the power of free movement so the pendulum can effect the lever (causing it to move) while at the same time retaining its own swing. Therefore the movement of the lever is an energy addition inherient to the pendulum. When stopping the output/lever the input/pendulum is not reduced, so why not connect the output/lever to the input/pendulum causing it to perpetuate? The additional energy inherient from the pendulum is more than enough to keep the pendulum going. I am building the device then adding a very simple mechanism to "connect" the output to the input. The synchronization of the output and input seem quite simple. Once built and tested, ill post results...

Alex

[Merg]

RHead is on the road again!

UpDate on escapement that works for 2 stage oscillator
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nu3cy9MyzFI

Size , Shape , AND Weight of pendulum Does matter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-rjJbTs200

[AnandAadhar]

Its quite clear that the pendulum is independent from the lever, it retains the power of free movement so the pendulum can effect the lever (causing it to move) while at the same time retaining its own swing. Therefore the movement of the lever is an energy addition inherient to the pendulum. When stopping the output/lever the input/pendulum is not reduced, so why not connect the output/lever to the input/pendulum causing it to perpetuate? The additional energy inherient from the pendulum is more than enough to keep the pendulum going. I am building the device then adding a very simple mechanism to "connect" the output to the input. The synchronization of the output and input seem quite simple. Once built and tested, ill post results...

Alex

Not quite independent... Clearly the lever is energized by the pendulum and thus takes energy from it. Even though the pendulum movement seems to be unhindered by it, the pendulum will, logically spoken - and this I also noticed in my tests -, swing less, that is shorter, when the lever is allowed to move along. This you can test. If positive to you as well, - mind e.g. the position of the pivot point, high or low - that doesn't mean that there wouldn't be any gain in efficiency of transmitting pulses this way. But the OU claim still needs to be proven by experiment before we can confirm that we have gold in our hands here. So indeed go ahead and build a loop. But we mustn't confuse efficiency gain with energy gain.