Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Started by hartiberlin, November 30, 2006, 06:11:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 80 Guests are viewing this topic.

Low-Q

Quote from: fletcher on February 09, 2011, 04:22:02 PM
The simple & only answer omnibus, is then close the loop with this excess Energy, to validate & prove your point !

No other discussion is required !
Agreed. If it can't give us continious and infinite work without input energy, it is not OU. OU isnt a temporary working device which is depending on input energy all the time.
By not being able to explain the fact with quantum mathematics, doesnt prove it is OU. A practical experiment, which automaticly includes all necessary practical mathematics available, is all we need to confirm what is facts.

Vidar

Solomon111

This is very useful part of scientific papar LEONARDO DA VINCI GRAVITY MACHINE
- The legend, conspiracy of the silence and the hope - Veljko Milkovic

Comparison can also be made with a copy of Leonardo’s model
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A89EDdXawvM#t=8m30s where superiority of pendulum
was 600 times, or 60.000%.
Top accomplishments of contemporary technology concerning friction decrease
can be achieved by usage of ceramic bearings.

Comparison of Steel and Ceramic Bearings â€" Duration of Rotation
Little wheel of skateboard                                  (A1) Steel bearing.................5 seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZfamxrIQgU   (A2) Ceramic bearing..........31 seconds
Big wheel of the bike                                         (B1) Steel bearing.................8 seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NW7wKg6OSFg(B2) Ceramic bearing..........36 seconds

Advantage of pendulum in comparison with steel bearings is from 1350 (B1) till
3600 (A1) times, in percentage it s from 135.000 till 360.000%.

Advantage of pendulum in comparison with ceramic bearings is from 300 (B2) till
348 (A2) times, in percentage from 30.000 till 34.800%.

Similar advantages of the pendulum are achieved in transmission, various kinds
of rotors and flywheels, and on site www.veljkomilkovic.com there are more about
practical application, theoretical analysis, video documents, opinions, rewords etc.

Watch here...
http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Docs/Veljko_Milkovic_Leonardo_da_Vinci_Gravity_Machine.pdf

gdez

This guy is using the eccentric rotor idea in this simulation, and it looks like he may be onto something

http://www.youtube.com/user/purelyprimitives

Mechanical resonance pt 1 & 2

Looks like an easy build also.

Omnibus

Quote from: Low-Q on February 10, 2011, 06:13:41 AM
Agreed. If it can't give us continious and infinite work without input energy, it is not OU. OU isnt a temporary working device which is depending on input energy all the time.
By not being able to explain the fact with quantum mathematics, doesnt prove it is OU. A practical experiment, which automaticly includes all necessary practical mathematics available, is all we need to confirm what is facts.

Vidar

The above is incorrect.