12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[noonespecial]

Just a possible small correction on your technical presentation.

On page 11 you show Mr. Chalkalis' device and call out the flywheel as being balanced. It's not.

If you view the video at just after the 4:00 point when he does the 'walk-around', you can see that the flywheel has an offset mass which is actually counterbalancing the main rotor. Unless this is what you were referring to when you say balanced?

[ARMCORTEX]

If we have oscillating ''middle point'' of a mass.

We can use movement itself as timing tensionner of a belt no?

What kind of belt would resist to this abuse, not the teethed.

This of this video as an example. what if I created a loose triangular belt that gets tensionned and motor inputs its stored energy in a shock type scenario.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npqeKnc_eyM

I think I mentionned this before. But preferably, you would want to push the far side, wich has greater torque but les SFM, but forces do translate their as well.
Far side smacks are more complicated, you need magnets, of very ingenois computer controlled physical methods.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2M89QnJaPY8

I wonder whats their trick here, hydraulics and magnets. Combinations of both strenght and speed/suddenness

Theres something that Ltseung is missing that these guys have figured out.

Doubt things would be this big if they were not power ready for customers.

I have asked Ltseung many time, What parameters of dictate frequency of push vs constant load.
This is something that Ltseung has not yet put on paper, all these papers are useless in terms of practicality.

[ltseung888]

I have asked Ltseung many time, What parameters of dictate frequency of push vs constant load.
This is something that Ltseung has not yet put on paper, all these papers are useless in terms of practicality.

The period of swing of a simple gravity pendulum depends on its length, the local strength of gravity, and to a small extent on the maximum angle that the pendulum swings away from vertical.  It is independent of the mass of the bob. If the amplitude is limited to small swings, the period T of a simple pendulum, the time taken for a complete cycle, is approximately

2 x pi x Sqrt(L/g)    where pi=3.1416, L=length, g=local gravitational acceleration

If the Unbalanced Wheel is kept to small angle swings, we can match the frequency of other components easily.  Unfortunately the Unbalanced Wheel works best in complete rotations.  That formula no longer holds.

The alternative is to do experiments.  Instead of keep changing wheels, we can have a weight that can slide on a rod.  Hunting for resonance is not easy as we do not have the magic formula yet...

The QEG achieved resonance at approximately 400 hz, what is the diameter of the Unbalanced Wheel to match that?  Putting any Unbalanced Wheel on may not get resonance.  (Pushing the swing blindly...)

[ltseung888]

Just a possible small correction on your technical presentation.

On page 11 you show Mr. Chalkalis' device and call out the flywheel as being balanced. It's not.

If you view the video at just after the 4:00 point when he does the 'walk-around', you can see that the flywheel has an offset mass which is actually counterbalancing the main rotor. Unless this is what you were referring to when you say balanced?

Good point.  When I played with the Yuen Wheel, a single unbalanced wheel produced much shaking.  When I put two wheels, the shaking was reduced.  The two wheels can be individually balanced or unbalanced.  I believe Mr. Chalkalis may have found something similar.  The total system is still unbalanced...

[ltseung888]

Refer to the diagram on reply 2525, there are certain points to note:

1.   The top setup with the motor driving a flywheel will not produce a seesaw action.  No gravitational energy is expected to be brought-in.
2.   The bottom setup with the motor driving an Unbalanced Wheel will produce the seesaw action.  The Lee-Tseung lead-out energy theory attributes this to bringing-in gravitational energy.
3.   The Lee-Tseung theory explains the Milkovic 2SO as a lead-out energy device.  It follows that the Chan Wheel will also be a lead-out energy device with higher efficiency.
4.   The William Skinner device is likely to be another lead-out energy device.  See the Youtube video.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxIRaJlTD4Y
5.   The Peru scientist, Chalkalis, also used the Unbalanced Wheel to lead-out gravitational energy.
6.   The Chas Campbell system is likely to be based on the Unbalanced Wheel.
7.   The Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier uses 3 sets of Cylinders (likely to be unbalanced).
8.   The Tong and Ting Wheels definitely use Unbalanced Wheels.  (I helped to design or advise them.)
9.     The Bessler Wheel may not be a hoax.  We are developing the Yuen Wheel.
10.   Almost forgot the Taiwan device.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xj_XUWKiIM  The device was shown on TV and the inventor Tang and team already got funding.  They can be contacted and their product is expected to be out within 1 year.


The above points indicate that leading-out or bringing-in gravitational energy is possible.  We just need to confirm it more.  My personal preference is to lead-out magnetic or electromagnetic energy.

Morality Point:
Focus on Points 1 and 2.  We shall learn much from the experiments.

(Improving the Milkovic 2SO with the Chan Wheel provided us with much new understanding...)