Pierre's 170W in 1600W out Looped Very impressive Build continued & moderated

[T-1000]

Il n'y a pa de magie ou de résonance ou tout autre chose c'est simplement une aimant qui passe devant une bobine sauf qu'il faut juste replique cette idee corectement la rotation n'est qu'un aspect cherchez dans cettte direction et vous produirer un surplus d'energie

En.  There is no magic or resonance or anything else.  It's just a magnet that passes in front of a coil, except that you have to replicate this idea properly.  Rotation is only one aspect.  Look in that direction and you will produce a surplus of energy

Yep, and I keep repeating myself here about same thing but with coils overlapping it is a bit challenge to everyone for doing that in solid state...

Cheers!

[jerdee]

Hello Pierre,

Been taking more time to learn about coil return. I believe I have been making it too complicated.  This is human nature unfortunately.

Your cap bank is both your source and your return for your coils.  I understand that coil return is only one aspect to your design.  I understand that you want to recover in both polarities of each field.   

When all of your diodes are going to positive cap bank, this leads me think you are using diodes very similar to a "Center tapped full wave rectifier" mode.  Fields can be combined, to allow for a center tap and send all diodes back to positive of your cap.  You will recovery both polarities in this arrangement.  Is this a good direction of thinking?

Thank you for your guidance. 
Jerdee
______________________________
Bonjour Pierre,

J'ai pris plus de temps pour en savoir plus sur le retour de la bobine. Je crois que je l'ai rendu trop compliqué. C'est la nature humaine malheureusement.

Votre banque de condensateur est à la fois votre source et votre retour pour vos bobines. Je comprends que le retour de bobine n'est qu'un aspect de votre conception. Je comprends que vous voulez récupérer dans les deux polarités de chaque champ.

Lorsque toutes vos diodes vont aux positif des condensateurs, cela m'amène à penser que vous utilisez des diodes très similaires à un mode "Rectifier à ondes pleines centrées". Les champs peuvent être combinés, pour permettre un tapotement central et renvoyer toutes les diodes au positif de vos condensateur. Vous récupérerez les deux polarités dans cet arrangement.
Est-ce une bonne direction à prendre?

Merci pour vos conseils.
Jerdee

[ariovaldo]

Yep, and I keep repreating myself here about same thing but with coils overlapping it is a bit challenge to everyone for doing that in solid state...

Cheers!

T-100, just for test my plan is to build one like that, using 100 volts dc to pulse the coils ( 29 awg wire ). To get the "moving magnet", I will not overlap the coils physically, but in the sequencer.
The sequencer is in the video.
https://youtu.be/nCReDKa6Fn8
What do you think?

[TinselKoala]

A placeholder to mark this special time.
1. With Luc departing... who will be carrying on the definitive work? Jerdee? Where, how, who funds the project?
2. Where does the 60.5 Hz come from? I know, and so do some of you. You've all PROVEN several times over that it cannot be coming from the "DZ Generator" itself. And I'm telling you once again: It is coming from the Quebec electrical grid!
3. What is the moral position of someone who +actually+ has, or had "before the relays burned out" something that could literally save the world, save starving and dying children EVERY DAY.... but who can't be arsed to rebuild the "working" unit and show it to someone who matters, like a UNIVERSITY RESEARCH DEPARTMENT, and instead keeps teasing this community with his dribbles and drops of nothingburger grease....  This is a rhetorical question emphasizing that NOBODY with a heart or conscience would withhold those "secrets".
4. Therefore.... well, some of us can "do the math". You are fluffing the ego of a hoaxer.

Let me remind you that your hero Pierre has published several other videos of "self runners" that were not as he claimed, and once the public attention started getting heavy, he REMOVED those videos and the associated claims. Why? Because they were too easy to prove to be hoaxes. You lot have completely abdicated your critical thinking facilities. Not only is there absolutely no conventional theoretical justification to expect "OU" from such a contraption, you are blindly accepting a YOU TUBE video that makes extraordinary claims, without the least bit of an attempt at independent verification of the YOU TUBE VIDEO claims.

[konehead]

Pierre's translation a few posts back:

Il n'y a pa de magie ou de résonance ou tout autre chose c'est simplement une aimant qui passe devant une bobine sauf qu'il faut juste replique cette idee corectement la rotation n'est qu'un aspect cherchez dans cettte direction et vous produirer un surplus d'energie

En.  There is no magic or resonance or anything else.  It's just a magnet that passes in front of a coil, except that you have to replicate this idea properly.  Rotation is only one aspect.  Look in that direction and you will produce a surplus of energy