Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[Sergh]

Thank you, Kator, for the link. After reading the text from the link, I understood the chronology of the publication of Frungel's books.

In 1950, Frank Fruengel founded the company "Impulsphysik F. Fruengel". In 1960, he published one of the first books about the utilization of capacitor discharges[5], followed in 1965 by the book "High Speed Pulse Technology"[6].
...
[5]F. Früngel: Impulstechnik – Erzeugung und Anwendung von Kondensatorentladungen (Impulse Technology – Generation and Application of Capacitor Discharges). Leipzig. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Geest&Portig KG, 1960, 1. Aufl., 573 pages.
[6]Frank B.A. Früngel: High Speed Pulse Technology. 2 Volumes. Academic Press New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, San Francisco. 1965.

ok, then first book I read:
[5]
Frank Fruengel Pulse technology. Generation and application of capacitor discharges. Translated from German to Russian in 1965.

About the discharges in water on pages 272 - 283. No Free Energy or Overunity declared in this book.


But second Frungel book i can not found to free download.
[6]Frungel, High Speed Pulse Technology, Academic Press Inc., 1965, reference to pp. 140-148 from Edwin V Gray patent US3890548A "Pulsed capacitor discharge electric engine"
or

Frungel, F. 1965 High Speed Pulse Technology, Vol. 2. Academic Press, New York. Reference from the article P.Graneau, N.Graneau "Arc-liberated chemical energy exceeds electrical input energy" :

During the Second World War, Frungel (1948) measured the unusual strength of water arc explosions. He concluded that the explosions were not caused by heat and steam, and admitted freely that he was unable to explain the phenomenon.

Where can I find proof about this from the author, Frank Fruengel? Maybe the second book should have something about overunity discharges in water?If anyone has access to the second book, can you provide quotes from there that would relate to the overunity discharges in water?

[dxer_87]

According to was written about the nature of machines. Its only a matter of build from existing parts to put them on move (oscillations, light, heat, pressure, freeze, other chemical reactions). And yes, pressure is a kind of energy.

What we use in nowadays mobile energy solution is mostly the last thing (one use batteries, loaded batteries). Its complicate, not cheap, not ecological except if you have spare acid eneough and poisoned steel lying around...

So this is political.

In the air near to Earth we may collect much energy from air that consists: Electro Waves and Fields, Magnetic Waves and Fields, Cold Electricity, Humidity, Ion Power, Atomic Radiation, Kapanadze, Hendershot or other mysterious coil resonances (like on 140mm or 260mm tube).

Looking closelsy that in some condition used THT devices have overunity that means more output than input if you go through from pin to pin with any antenna, mass (tin or metal constructions), and they work passively, though things like diodes, transistors and solar panels (with 1mom resistors) may be opened to hack the real energy efficiency.

Hope this was informative.

[Sergh]

100+!!! 100+!!! 101+!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_z-64YiDYM

And you, dear one, wind some coils like this and let's see how it lights up for you. And no hidden battery please!
In the video, comments is disabled, the author called himself "Fakov Fakov". Fake Fakevich? 


Search in Google video "Overunity":
https://www.google.com/search?q=overunity&tbm=vid

About 35,200 results

35,200 overunity devices! All functioning 100%!
Choose what you like and produce it, sell it all over the world!

[kolbacict]

What today to hear about the announce high temperature superconductor in july ?
Were the assumptions confirmed or not ?

[stivep]

That is not true,you seem to neglect, the greek inventor Zografos , who runs his house on water and some catalyst..
Regards, Stefan. (admin)

Zografos , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zografos
The page  seems - it was removed by Wikipedia?
_{Please specify  full name of the person  you talking about and his} patent _number.
Can you  provide Scientifically supported  evidence   or you can't ?
Are there any replications of Zografos today?

Talking about English language.
My comments says:

As a term, "overunity"   conflicts with  laws of  thermodynamics
// colliding with  physics laws , //
Bottom line is: it is rejected by science.

There is no me in this at all:
_{-my position is not  expressed here.}
It is me quoting the official position  of science.
So you are punishing a person for quoting  someone else's opinion.
I see it as unfair and wrong and discriminative.
Please be  so kind and correct me if you think  I'm wrong.

Wesley