Is this the Smith/Kapanadze secret ?

[NerzhDishual]

 
Salve OU dot com fellows,

IMO#1, Belflior is a creative experimenter and a worth-to-be-read poster.

Few others members seem, IMO#2, less creative but more sermonizers.

Anyway  :
What about charging a (few uf range indeed), capacitor with an Avramenko plug, a short
kinda "antenna" near a Slayer Exciter ? See attached picture.
I have tested this contraption. It works.

Absolutely no OU claimed here.
Just, perhaps, a sort of proof of (some) concept and any food for thought ?

If electrons were needed to charge this capacitor, where do they come from?
Are they traveling through the air?

Avec mes salutations les plus distinguées,
Jean

[forest]

NerzhDishual


If you have it working then please test various obstacles between the Slayer exciter and the Av plug section. Then for the last part test some metal plate and metal sheet grounded and tell us the effect.

[Belfior]

Salve OU dot com fellows,

IMO#1, Belflior is a creative experimenter and a worth-to-be-read poster.

Few others members seem, IMO#2, less creative but more sermonizers.

Thank you for your kind words. I can't see any reason there can't be OU or like I see it "creating movement in the ambient energy and harvesting it". We just need to take a fresh look at this stuff and not just repeat stuff that was already said 100 years ago and was wrong even then. I feel some people are just like priests and just bable the old ceremony. There reason OU is hiding is because we are asking the wrong questions. People try to guide is into wrong directions and if you keep building&using your circuits like they teach you in school you can never find it. That is why the school is there.

There is no current in the equation for charge in a capacitor. This tells me that it is a function of capacitance and voltage. If it takes some amps then it is for internal resistances.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atlnVNy0IDE

the text at the end of the video indicates, that there is no raise in current when the cap charges. So input to the system is not tied to the output/load

[AlienGrey]

Thank you for your kind words. I can't see any reason there can't be OU or like I see it "creating movement in the ambient energy and harvesting it". We just need to take a fresh look at this stuff and not just repeat stuff that was already said 100 years ago and was wrong even then. I feel some people are just like priests and just bable the old ceremony. There reason OU is hiding is because we are asking the wrong questions. People try to guide is into wrong directions and if you keep building&using your circuits like they teach you in school you can never find it. That is why the school is there.

There is no current in the equation for charge in a capacitor. This tells me that it is a function of capacitance and voltage. If it takes some amps then it is for internal resistances.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atlnVNy0IDE

the text at the end of the video indicates, that there is no raise in current when the cap charges. So input to the system is not tied to the output/load

If the current is constant as in a TV display picture then the slope would be linear.

The Tesla coil: the bigger the diameter the more current