IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

[nix85]

Blind?  You forgot to say MOMENTARY.  Stopping cancels the increase.


Also, see my last post on the previous page.

Yes, blind. I didn't forget anything.

"Stopping cancels the increase" lol.

Yea stopping the oscillation stops the acceleration, also sky is blue.

[nix85]

Don't forget that when a pendulum changes direction it's momentum doesn't just disappear - it's transferred to the overall mechanism, in the reverse direction.


Can you show that the 'force' of Inertia is related to the ZPE?

Ofc it doesn't just disappear no one said nor implied that. It is key to stop it or withdraw in a way that does not produce back reaction. Stopping it at the axis produces zero back reaction as i said many times. It produces back torque which is totally different thing. And of course inertia is related to ZPE, everything springs from it.

[nix85]

I already linked to this but here it is again. https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/antigravity-drone-lge-first-in-the-world--2?fbclid=IwAR15eef813rphbWcgTphbZw-i3X4-Vd_xCvMPI6NwFsni2Ccmf1Lv90Rjgo#/ This guy is a naval mechanical engineer and he teamed up with a friend automotive engineer and after months of testing came up with working inertial drone based on ferrofluid. It is something very similar to this patent i also already linked https://patents.google.com/patent/US20040159090
I corresponded with him over the mail several times, he is completely ignorant of the basic principle described before and thinks his drone would not work in space. They got no support at all on Indiegogo probably cause people thought it was fake. Well, it's up to you to decide if it is.

[nix85]

You're welcome and no worries, i like sparks.

All skepticism goes away when you grasp the simple basic principle.

So simple, so powerful.

But after all, all inertial drives are the lowest kind of reactionless propulsion.

Stone age "antigravity". They do have a purpose still.

[nix85]

Ofc thrust is reaction, and what you say now i figured many years ago.

But at the same time it is proper to call it reactioness in a sense perfectly implied

that it does not react with outside matter or force. You like to nitpick don't you,

and yet you still don't get the basic principle.