Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Pulsing an iron-core by running electrical-current through it ?

Started by postingsite, August 07, 2018, 10:33:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

postingsite

What actually is the most efficient way to pulse an iron-core, which is normally pulsed by the coil in which the core is placed .

   - Could a more efficient method to pulse an iron-core,  be to run a pulse of current through it,  the same( amount ) of pulsed current that was going to be run through the coil in which the core was normally placed  ?

   -  You would still require a coil ( maybe with a different number of windings or thickness ) around the core, to collect any energy gain,  unless,  there is some other method to collect that energy gain  ?
         
    -  Could an alternative method to collect energy gain from an  iron-core,  be to attach two wires to it,  and then pulse the core via some method which does not use those two wires ( maybe by attaching a third and fourth wire to the core in order to pulse it )   ?

    -  Would this alternative method of pulsing an iron-core,  result in more surplus output from the  iron-core  ?

postingsite

Quote from: postingsite on August 07, 2018, 10:33:20 PM
    -  Could an alternative method to collect energy gain from an  iron-core,  be to attach two wires to it,  and then pulse the core via some method which does not use those two wires ( maybe by attaching a third and fourth wire to the core in order to pulse it )   ?

   Four wires running to and from the iron-core,  probably not logical,  since any surplus output from the iron-core would also be collected in the output wire of the first pair of wires used to pulse the iron-core .

aussiebattler

It looks like you have re-invented the transformer. Perhaps you could patent it.

postingsite

Any company that thinks I invented this idea ( and that I can prove it ) would already have contacted me, everyone knows who I am  etc 
   (  I already contacted most of the companies over 2 years ago,  regarding  non-overunity ( and yet suppressed fields of design ) designs,  but I already knew I would have no success
   
I think there may be people on this site who do make money from tech on here,  selling  self-powered-motor-generators or even solid-state-self-powered-generators,  magnet-motors just can not compare with these
________

I'm really curious if,   pulsing an iron-core by running electrical-current through it,  and the alternative methods of collecting any energy gain,  that I posted on this thread,  if they actually work or not .

You'd think maybe not,  since apparently electricity actually only flows across the surface of conductors including metals,  and also,  maybe you'd really have to be on the outside of an iron-core to collect the most of the amplified  magnetic-field  .

However,  what if,  in metals,  there is always electricity flowing in all random directions,  and when you pass a current through it,  you make the big mass of an  iron-cores  electrical activity only flow in one direction,  the result being an energy gain .
   Or maybe some other type of cascading effect,  the result being an energy gain


postingsite

Some overunity,  or power-amplification  ideas .

-----------
 
  1 -  Pulsing an iron-core by running electrical-current through it ?

-----------

  2 -  What if you keep a piece of quartz permanently bent, and then run direct-current through it,  for some reason I think this configuration may amplify the current .
         (  I also remembered,  some time ago I found a thread on some website,  about someone that seemed to have discovered this configuration and was very surprised at the  current-amplification it produced,  and all the responses on that page said he must have made some sort of mistake, and that it was not possible. 
             Since I did not note the website etc,  I was not able to locate that thread again .

-----------

  3 -  What about rolling coated( insulate-coating ) thin-copper-sheet, or other metal sheet,  into a coil,   so with all that increased surface area, for inductance,  could it function as a power amplifier ?

-----------

    4 -   Below, I have attached a diagram of a very simple capacitor-and-coils-with-cores-generator  design.
        NOTE - Not all of the wiring in that diagram is completed,  I don't know how to complete it,  I have no experience in this field,  etc .

         -  It relies on using very-small-capacitors,  since for some reason I think that the smaller capacitors are,  then the more efficient they are ( maybe because bigger objects are more dense, and therefore larger capacitors lose more energy to the environment in the electromagnetic-pulse they generate .
         -  It also relies on power amplification through coils-with-cores,  obviously requiring correct different windings on the output-coil ( number of windings, thickness of wire,  spacing between windings )
         -  It also relies on the fact( I assume ) that even though all the capacitors will be identical,  there will still be a slight difference in the time each one needs to charge up,   so that capacitors will always ( usually ) be discharging at different points in time,   so I think that is why this device would keep on running as a  self-powered-device.

-----------