Bifilar pancake coil overunity experiment

[F6FLT]

...
I mean if all the greatest minds in our history thought they knew everything then why bother looking for a new discovery?
...

The difference between great minds and ordinary minds is precisely that the former know their limits, they know that they do not know everything, but they also know that they know certain things.
Only ordinary minds think they would face a new discovery simply because they would observe something they didn't know or don't understand.

A theory is only necessary if new facts need to be explained, or if a more general theory can replace specific theories.
But when something seems new, the first thing to do is to check if what you have is really new.

So there are two things to check:
1) Is the fact that we seem to be observing real? And here with TK's experience, it is clear that any measurement bias must be eliminated before asserting it.
2) Is the fact that we are observing new? The less competent you are, and the less you can say it, because you are unable to explain the fact not because the explanation does not exist, but because you ignore it.
If you do not have sufficient scientific skills, you will be unable to make the link with known theories, and if you are also affected by the Dunning-Kruger effect, you will not understand that this missing knowledge can exist; too confident and unaware of your limitations, you will invent absurd theories to explain what is already known (most FE theories are of this type).
A great mind is modest, self-conscious, and cautious, it does not theorize without really very good reasons.

[color]

Hi.
I am interested in your theory.
We support.

[ayeaye]

they also know that they know certain things.

Yes they know some things, but most importantly they also can think. Think analytically, model things in their mind, one should learn that as well, the same as one learns other things. Without that thinking ability there really is no hope that one can make new discoveries, all who did most likely had such thinking ability. Some writer once said, it looks like that all think that everyone can write a book, they don't realize that there is a lot to learn to write a book, to do it anyhow well, that is.

No i don't think that i know everything, i know that there is a lot more that i don't know than what i know. Naturally, i cannot think otherwise, because as i see the world around me and think about it, i see how much i don't know. Like you are in nature, every blade of grass has life in it, which we don't really understand. Not to talk insects or birds or animals. Not to talk the immense number of stars above our head. So much unknown, and so much wonderful, far beyond our ability to understand. Makes you feel humble, right?

[ayeaye]

F6FLT, i have never written a book. The books most difficult to write are said to be children's books. I have never written a children's book. I though translated a book about puppy raising, this was very difficult to do. Then they sold this book in the pet store. This book had many lovely pictures in it.

[F6FLT]

...Like you are in nature, every blade of grass has life in it, which we don't really understand. Not to talk insects or birds or animals. Not to talk the immense number of stars above our head. So much unknown, and so much wonderful, far beyond our ability to understand. Makes you feel humble, right?

For me humility is a feeling that has been instilled in us by millennia of religions as a necessary attitude towards gods: "God you are great, we are pathetic". It is not an attitude that we should have towards Nature (nor with a hypothetical god but it is another story). Nature is blind, it has no intention, we emerged at random from its set of laws, we are aware of it, and now it is we who want to play with it.
I don't feel "humble", modesty is enough.  Look at human progress since the time of the caves. I only see the riddles of nature. Understanding or solving them is one of life's interests, for everyone at their own level and also for the best of us when they discover new things and thus increase knowledge for posterity. This does not mean that we would be happier, but that we can be more aware of our condition, more in control of our future.
Moreover, we don't know what we're going to find along the way, which is considerably less annoying than thinking that everything is fixed by divine dogmas, in fact enacted by archaic prophets who have never spoken except in the name of their superstitions.
When I see "the immense number of stars above our head", I regret that we can't access them now, but I tell myself that it's perfectly within the realm of the possible, just a question of time.