Inarticulate minds stuck in convolution

[tinman]

Brad,

You seem to have a very high opinion of yourself. Your challenges and disagreements are very highly valued in your own eyes. Yet, I sense a high degree of uncertainty.

E is for electric, M is for magnetic, orthogonally they are Electro-Magnetic, known as electromagnetic.

Charge separation comes in many forms, very simple solutions for simple experiments exist.
    Chemical
    Mechanical
    Magnetic
    others...

A good read: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/charge-separation learn something new.

When one catches the wave, one only need ride it down to equilibrium, then one must trigger a new wave peak by bring up the potential again. You have lost the ability to bring forth the wave.

If only you could look past what you read--what others believe creates charge separation.

Why do you find it so hard to understand that one single entity exists in all you list to create charge separation?.

A magnetic field-an invisible force that separates charges
An electric field-an invisible force that separates charges
Gravitational field-an invisible force that separates charges
A chemical field that separates charges
Temperature differentials that separates charges
Massless particles that separates charges

They all have one thing in common--what is it?.
Piece it altogether.

My question to you--
Why dose a magnetic field have to change/vary over time to induce an EMF across a conductor?

Brad, it appears the confusion you have gained is crippling your intelligence! I think we have found what you're hiding.

I hide nothing--not even my real name.

Are you confident enough in what you preach to come forth with your real name?
Or will you hide behind the name of a fictional character,because you are unsure of what you claim.


Brad

[lancaIV]

I do not want to disturb your civil conversion, but give only some links as audient :
thermo-pile as electro-magnet current source
http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=102004020962&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=en
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mi.html : 2 kinds of acceleration by the same time !

Resonance-Modulation : variable signal drive
before a motor or after a generator/ alternator or before a motor and after a generator/alternator :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=1&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20060801&CC=TW&NR=200627764A&KC=A#
Sincerely and feliz navidade
                                                    OCWL

[Mr.Miyagi]

lancaIV,

A nice find, constructive and worthy material of study! Thank You!

The population know of the simple things in science. Being a magnetic field generates an EMF in a coil, its easy to explain, its a simple experiment. It is senseless to enter debate about the underlaying and fundamental cause and effect.

People know the changing magnetic field generates an EMF, the faster the change the more the EMF. The more turns the more the EMF but one has to think the turns have a resistance, this impedance increases as the turns increases.

A generator must be free of input to output magnetic effects that are negative, positive effects are a bennefit however, meaning, the input must not be subject to Lenz's Law from the secondary coil. A disconnect is required here!


At the point of disconnect, the secondary coil has no source, there is no pressure to pump current.


What geometry, what arrangement could be implimented to pump current in this secondary coil?

[Mr.Miyagi]

Efficiency is an important aspect!

The average person will know that the Heat Pump has an effective efficiency of around 300%. A process worthy of study!

From a technical aspect, the electron, having it's own angular momentum, also having an orbital angular momentum, having its own magnetic moment, a resulting field that is a field of inverse square intensity, at velocity, which we thought of as current in prior posts, but learned that it likely is not the electron alone that is responsible for what we see as a current, and that what we see as a current, is charged particles, at velocity, with the same aspects described, the speed of which is close to but not beyond the speed of light, is directly responsible for what we call the magnetic field.

However, the magnetic field is what we see as being responsible for creating a voltage; under the conditions of velocity and proximity to a conductor. We know that a magnetic field that has velocity, is an electric field. There in raises the question; are the same conditions responsible for each resulting field. The answer is yes.

The same charged particles are at velocity in both situations.

Charge flows down an insulated conductor the same as water flows down a pipe. A wake is the resulting disturbance of the charged particles at velocity, this is seen throughout nature; a boat at velocity leaves a wake; a bullet at velocity leaves a wake; a charged particle at velocity leaves a wake and this wake is called the magnetic field.

Brad had some answers wrong, he was not able to learn why, some of his answers were right but he had no idea why. It is important that you know why your answers are right.

Its just as important to know why your answers are wrong!

As charged particles are put under pressure, as in a heat pump, the potential that we create, that we then put under pressure, then creates a current.

[lancaIV]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnot_cycle

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_engine#Efficiency
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnot_method
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exergy

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law_of_thermodynamics

The  work C.O.P. is not by Physics Determination "efficiency".
I think you are referring "300%" the average industrial air/air heat pump work numbers !
Do you know about compressor-free heat pumps, working like closed cycle solar collectors ?!
What would be the overall industrial heat pump work C.O.P using this electric compressor drive :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=1&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19951107&CC=US&NR=5463914A&KC=A#
inventor recomend also the use of his device for refrigerators: carnot-cycle engine
Second last paragraph from the "description"-page recitating : " .... are compared with the conventional motors to conclude that at most only one eleventh of the power consumed in above cited motors is required. ........"

Alternatively : the Linevich wheel-drive,  in their papers heatpump  apply also recomended !

Now to micromechanical electrical Carnot-Cycle engines :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19941018&CC=US&NR=5356484A&KC=A#
" ... The reversible thermoelectric ( reversible : electrothermic) converter can be operated for : ......... "
a multi-functional device spended by the Carnot-Cycle !
Happy days wishingOCWL