Simplest oscillators for DC

[forest]

I'm writing here maybe somebody can help me. I have a capacitor and I need to figure out what current it will produce when shorted on very low resistance. It's photoflash type 60uF 330V - how to find the current generated in photo flash lamp ? Is that something dependable on internal resistance ESR ? Is that something producer should provide in datasheet ? Let assume I have such condensator discharge using DC oscillator and I need to choose proper mosfet ;-) HELP ME please 

[sparkmen]

hi forest, there is a simple app for smart phone "electrodroid" free of charge, you can play with charge/discharge capacitor current/time, assuming a ESR of capacitor added to internal mosfet Ron resistance

[sparkmen]

hi forest, there is a simple app for smart phone "electrodroid" free of charge, you can play with charge/discharge capacitor current/time, assuming a ESR of capacitor added to internal mosfet Ron resistance

if you have  a 60 uF  loaded at 330v and discharged on esr+Ron+load =10ohm , initial current is 33A

[Belfior]

Yes one thing is, he looks at his "frames of reference" like completely separated from each other, they all have like different space and different time. This is one example of ignoring connections, in space and time.

David Bohm on the other hand saw everything connected, like all comes forth from quantum entanglement.

Ignore connections, and you cannot explain why a photon goes through two slots at the same time. The key i think is, that photon is not a "local spot", it is a structure in more space than a point, that is interconnected. Thus it can be in two locations that are near each other in space, at the same time, including maybe in two different "frames of reference".

It's not that relativity is wrong, relativity is a hermetic principle, it is a universal law. It is the right way to see things as relative, but it is not right, to see them separated.

Like orgone is self-organizing, in theory. This is impossible without connections. Ignore connections, and such concepts become theoretically impossible. Thus they say everything moves towards entropy, which is chaos, that is total destruction.

I agree for the most part. Like 10 years ago I would have said that astrology is just crap and maybe most of it is, but you can also think on planets and such as gravity lenses. You will get different frequencies and levels of power hitting you when some planets are aligned. I can't say how it affects you or does it, but the energy comes here. More energy means more heat and movement. Maybe also inside your brain.

Everything light. Energy and vibrations. This table and my thoughts. We can affect EM waves with coils and such. Why couldn't we affect thought? and we can:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_helmet

I have not studied the orgone. I suspect we are talking about hte monoatomic gold and such?

Funny how sumerians say the gods came here to get gold for their "twindling atmosphere" and then every Egyptian hieroglyph has the Pharaoh listing his "manna" or "Ormus" what the elite were eating. I think the sumerian atmosphere story is justa lie, so people would not get into their heads that monoatomic gold gives you "eternal" life

The most important things are kept secret and we are left in the matrix thinking this is the reality. F6LT has to go on every thread and say NONONO, because if his reality is not the reality, then he has being lied to all his life and he can't take it. Same thing with other religions. It is better if everybody is wrong and there is no God, than this one guy having a nice life while others are going to church every Sunday and "not doing sin" like watching boobs and drinking beer.

[Belfior]

As we don't know exactly how it is, and a huge number of possibilities, the result of every experiment would most likely be negative, this should be expected. Every such negative experiment is important though, removing some possibilities and making further research easier. It mostly enables to understand things more, sometimes giving indications of how to move further. But negative results are mostly disregarded, and all the work lost, with others destined to try it all over again. Then when having some theory, and  after many tries, one time may be a success. Nevertheless all who do the work, including these getting negative results, do important work and are equally worth credit.

Like F6FLT said, no one knows where the key hole is. But there are ways to search for the key hole. Every hole found is not the key hole though.

F6FLT is on the money in his point, but I feel like my of research keeps the field open for any possible solution. That takes care of the whole problem of even a possiblity of suppression. If you start your research by opening your school books, you are automatically shutting out certain aspects of research and IF there is suppression, it is in that book. Why should I take the risk.

Thinking that (almost) everything we are told is a lie will broaden the field A LOT. You go all the way to Gustave Le Bonn and even earlier writers to see, if they made experiments that still hold and they are never mentioned in contemporary science books. When ever you see something like "You cannot ever..." that is a prime candidate for inspection. How many will try anything similar, if you were taught in school to never to do that? I = U/R pretty much holds true only if I = U/R. So why is that taught as any kinda "law"  to us?

Tesla said everything is energy, frequency and vibration. I will rather go with that. Like it seems to me that some equations might be missing a term. Like if someone is saying that "this only works with DC" then that tells me, that the equation should have a extra term in it that has frequency there like R x f. Maybe we can even get an equation to give us over unity, but our equation is missing a term?

You can argue that DC or AC through a pure resistor is always the same, but is it really?

I do not believe the RLC tank theory, that the internal resistances eat the power and it dies. I can start a car with that cap, but somehow internal resistances of copper eat that power in 100ms?!? Something ain't right here. Either we do not understand caps or coils, or the RLC tank resonance theory is bullshit.

Where is all the fibonachi stuff from EM theory? You can see it everywhere in nature, but not in electricity?!?

E = mc^2 and every other equation is E=mv^2/2 like kinetic energy.

Why the light speed is in there? We already know it is not the maximum limit of speed. Why isn't it the speed of sound or some other arbitrary limit the WE have set? How I see the universe is that everything is EM waves (why do we need particles? We need them so much we start adding imaginary photons) and we  can affect EM waves. So very possibly there is very little that we cannot do. The limits are man made and you just need to take the red pill