A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1

[lancaIV]

A little off topic, but worth a look: https://youtu.be/uNYUu1VL1aM

and
   (https://overunity.com/Themes/default/images/post/xx.gif)   Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY  « Reply #22790 on: Today at 03:45:39 PM »  Quote
  Quote

#22766 ?

Yes. similar. Also coaxial-waveguide.
In general, this topic with the Lithuanians has haunted me for many years.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19941208&CC=DE&NR=4318270A1&KC=A1#


D´accord ?

Sincere
OCWL

p.s.: https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/mosaics?CC=ES&NR=2265253A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=20070201&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#

[Leely]

A little off topic, but worth a look: https://youtu.be/uNYUu1VL1aM

Yeah. If you see in the video where the motor was running, in my experiment, the torque of the motor did not exceed that of the battery, but the brightness and the heat from the bulb exceeded that of the battery. In other words, the motor may not have collected every power from the output. Maybe it will be of a good purpose to redesign the output rectification system, having in mind that the dc motor should run as strong as it ran directly from the input power or even stronger.

[NdaClouDzzz]

Yeah. If you see in the video where the motor was running, in my experiment, the torque of the motor did not exceed that of the battery, but the brightness and the heat from the bulb exceeded that of the battery. In other words, the motor may not have collected every power from the output. Maybe it will be of a good purpose to redesign the output rectification system, having in mind that the dc motor should run as strong as it ran directly from the input power or even stronger.

I believe that what we see in the video I linked to above is what Don Smith referred to as "chasing the electrical side, it will die a heat death". At no point during that stage that he shows in the video should he be tapping it for electricity to power a load. Instead he should have forgone the second primary (black coil that he tapped to run the loads) and instead used the magnetic field from the first primary coil (parallel LC) to induce a very high voltage in the long tesla-like coil (which needs to be tuned to resonate with the primary coil), and then rectified that high voltage output to pulsating DC which then is used as the positive potential in an electrostatic induction scheme similar to that demonstrated by Don Smith to pull a much MUCH larger amount of negative charges (electrons) from earth ground than that used to run the whole system. Essentially this scheme takes the place of the hand-held device used by Don in his demo (see video's) and is what Don did in many of his systems and referred to as "magnetic resonance" (as in the primary LC). (In many of Don's devices he used multiple processes, and magnetic resonance was one of those processes. Which device/s used which processes has confused many researchers). If done properly, it is electrostatic induction on steroids and the means for all of the free-energy one could ever need. Basically you can look at it as a circuit that allows you to plug into the vast charge of the earth battery.

https://youtu.be/yLjt3y1_ceY?t=3892

https://youtu.be/oyionE-sCis?t=3112 (battery powered, no ground loop)

A little more on topic here: https://overunity.com/18239/the-solution/

[lancaIV]

I believe that what we see in the video I linked to above is what Don Smith referred to as "chasing the electrical side, it will die a heat death". At no point during that stage that he shows in the video should he be tapping it for electricity to power a load. Instead he should have forgone the second primary (black coil that he tapped to run the loads) and instead used the magnetic field from the first primary coil (parallel LC) to induce a very high voltage in the long tesla-like coil (which needs to be tuned to resonate with the primary coil), and then rectified that high voltage output to pulsating DC which then is used as the positive potential in an electrostatic induction scheme similar to that demonstrated by Don Smith to pull a much MUCH larger amount of negative charges (electrons) from earth ground than that used to run the whole system. Essentially this scheme takes the place of the hand-held device used by Don in his demo (see video's) and is what Don did in many of his systems and referred to as "magnetic resonance" (as in the primary LC). (In many of Don's devices he used multiple processes, and magnetic resonance was one of those processes. Which device/s used which processe/s has confused many researchers). If done properly, it is electrostatic induction on steroids and the means for all of the free-energy one could ever need. Basically you can look at it as a circuit that allows you to plug into the vast charge of the earth battery.

https://youtu.be/yLjt3y1_ceY?t=3892

https://youtu.be/oyionE-sCis?t=3112 (battery powered, no ground loop)

we R leving/leaving the topic,pardon-moi,George1 ! :
More than only 1 or 2 trials,a brider overview about diversity this "phenomen" related :


https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=peswiki+magnetic+resonance+amplifier

                                               + Measurement Method comparison

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&ei=bpDYX92XF8ibgQbtjIDQAw&q=kanarev+pulse+power&oq=kanarev+pulse+power&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQDDIECAAQHlDPcVj7c2DbhQFoAHAAeACAAbgBiAGmA5IBAzAuM5gBAKABAaoBB2d3cy13aXrAAQE&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwjdhuGO5M_tAhXITcAKHW0GADoQ4dUDCAw

                                                                     !!!
http://www.rexresearch.com/mra/1mra.htm#error

Clarification of MRA Test Conditions Institute for Advanced Studies / EarthTech International, Inc.
Scott Little & H. E. Puthoff
3 February 1995

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_E._Puthoff




Therefore it was not a matter of MRA performance but a matter of measurement technique that disconfirmed the over-unity results.


In our original report we explained why the methods of McClain and Wooten yield erroneous results.
For the basic AC circuit theory that underlies our discussion we would recommend any of a number of excellent texts on this subject, for example "Principles of Linear Networks" by Friedland, Wing & Ash, McGraw-Hill, 1961

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=%22Principles+of+Linear+Networks%22+by+Friedland%2C+Wing+%26+Ash%2C+McGraw-Hill%2C+1961


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabriel_Kron   
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diakoptics

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=%22Diakoptics+%E2%80%94+The+Piecewise+Solution+of+Large-Scale+Systems%22




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Gabor
Gabor also researched how human beings communicate and hear; the result of his investigations was the theory of granular synthesis, although Greek composer Iannis Xenakis claimed that he was actually the first inventor of this synthesis technique.^[20] Gabor's work in this and related areas was foundational in the development of time–frequency analysis.

[Leely]

I believe that what we see in the video I linked to above is what Don Smith referred to as "chasing the electrical side,...

You see, Don Smith had his variation, I have my variation, Babosa and leal have their variation, Nelson Rochas has his variation. You do not explain something based on only one man's opinion. Don Smith's work was purely from Tesla. That coil is Tesla coil, not Don Smith coil. Don Smith did Tesla's work, raw, unrefined. Variations today are still from Tesla.