Test topic for moderator discussions and "Other"between members

[F6FLT]

----

[SolarLab]

F.Y.I.

Good stuff to be aware of; even if it would never ever happen here!     

How to Quickly Spot a "CLOWN" (some insight from the Experts(?))
Just so you can recognize it for what it is.

They will:

- Attempt to get a divisive or emotional response from you to derail research.

- Concern troll and copy/pasta spam shill to contradict confirmed findings.

- Employ faux debate tactics: Generalizations, gas-lighting, projection, misdirection, false equivalences,
confusing correlation with causation, appeal to authority, transference, false precepts, personal attacks,
straw-men, red herrings, etc.

- Promote social ethics that are disingenuous like doxxing, "reverse psychology", or promoting propaganda.

- Promote tactics that are unethical, illegal or involve methods outside the scope of the Law.

- Employ Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt to dissuade research.

Topic sliding - If information of a valuable or informative nature has been posted on a discussion forum,
it can be quickly removed from public view by topic sliding.

In this technique a large number of unrelated posts, or posts aimed at diluting the information presented,
are submitted in an effort to trigger a topic slide to literally push content out of view. Operators can control
several fake UIDs via the bots they make use of; these can also be called upon in the other techniques to
mask the intent of the operator from the users at large.

Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting, unless the thread is moderated, the post is now
lost in a sea of unrelated and bogus postings. 

Seeding bad information - Operatives will insert flawed or bogus information from time to time as an ongoing
tactic, depending on their skill set and the needs of their mission. Their most common ruse is providing information
or evidence which is backed by bad source material in the hope that the "source of the source" is never checked.
This serves several objectives, mainly resource consumption, evidence pollution, discouragement and misdirection.

Astroturfing consensus -This is a technique that attempts to build a manufactured consensus around a flawed
set of statements or compromised information. This is related to consensus cracking, where false evidence is
injected in an attempt to dispute or discredit what the current consensus is, and push it towards the desired
false consensus.  Misleading and false evidence and information are often salted into the evidence pool, with
an aim to impede organic consensus building, while also poisoning the available information and evidence.

Cultivating tacit approval (The legal term for this is 'silent agreement') - Attempting to attain this state is
done using a technique where operators will try to convince the user population to ignore, or not respond to
bad information or false assertions. This is done in a bid to reduce push-back against the above mentioned tactics.

It's worth noting that the reply filtering mechanism of the boards (which currently can't be disabled without code
changes from the site admin) is used as a weapon of sorts in this tactic: Filtering with software prevents anons
from defending against seeding bad information and astroturfing consensus. This is why the CLOWNS (operators)
push so hard to condition anons into filtering material they disagree with.   

FIN   
   
Also worth noting is it can be proven in many cases that the vast majority of these CLOWNS are well trained,
well paid, some are highly skilled, and they will often accuse you of the very "things" that they, themselves,
are engaged in... and they often work in groups while using numerious synms...

[AlienGrey]

Wesley Be a good fellow and please deleate some of this worthless crud please. or just just send then on there way.
many thanks

[Ansis]

Hi!
Of course, this link with video is very simple, but it is very similar with "Green box" video with
waterpipe and GAZ24 (Volga) car radiator.
https://youtu.be/sPPsyy54aYs
P.S. I think about "how to fake" process.
P.S2. Reality of self amplification up to 1000X is unknown to me and 50Hz stable power with 100 000W output
power is only possible when we stealing from somwhere.
P.S3. Atmospheric electricity exists, but power levels is small. The best beutifull video is filmed by "Lasersaber", and we can watch it here:
https://youtu.be/ENeDkGce5-4

[lancaIV]

Hi!
Of course, this link with video is very simple, but it is very similar with "Green box" video with
waterpipe and GAZ24 (Volga) car radiator.
https://youtu.be/sPPsyy54aYs
P.S. I think about "how to fake" process.
P.S2. Reality of self amplification up to 1000X is unknown to me and 50Hz stable power with 100 000W output
power is only possible when we stealing from somwhere.
P.S3. Atmospheric electricity exists, but power levels is small. The best beutifull video is filmed by "Lasersaber", and we can watch it here:
https://youtu.be/ENeDkGce5-4

"Factor 1000" and over "100 00 W" output in paper formate :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=WO&NR=8808220A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=19881020&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#
It is not "stealing" ,it is conversion.
Similar :
https://contest.techbriefs.com/2017/entries/sustainable-technologies/7503
Probably experimenting with Bitter https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Bitter electromagnets is easier thanto wait for cheap available superconductive room temperature AT winding coils.
Also interessant : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyotr_Kapitsa
Liquid nitrogen temperature superconductive state :
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=13984

https://www.tedmagnetics.com/
https://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/06/prweb15525181.htm
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=8&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20140403&CC=US&NR=2014091890A1&KC=A1#
"...CoPs in the range of 200 to 400 or greater... "