Open Source Vs. Patenting

[utilitarian]

No, Wrong, You haven't been to the EBM lab and seen the 10 tone device and or tested it and or understand how much they charge for their device. I do.I can see AGAIN that you have no idea of the situation. First you should of gone there your self to find out how much they are charging to use their device and license it.Think people give away a ten tone device to use for normal money?, LOL, your allot dumber then i thought. You think you can just purchase one for a few 1000 dollars?  The point is, your incredulous assumptions are not based on any experience, and your avid skeptic guesses are in now way a contribution much like your R and D attitude i see. I hope you learn and better your self soon and contribute.

I noticed how you conventiently do not know of a single company licensing the EBM technology or using an EBM device to power anything.  I guess their price is so high no one can afford it?  Maybe they ought to come down, what do you think?

[z.monkey]

Howdy Utilitarian,

As far as I can tell free energy patents never make it through the patent office, so there is nothing to sue over...

pity...

Blessed be...

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

I noticed how you conveniently do not know of a single company licensing the EBM technology or using an EBM device to power anything.  I guess their price is so high no one can afford it?  Maybe they ought to come down, what do you think?

>conventiently

Its spelled conveniently

I noticed how you don't know a single thing about the Patent office,REAL case files, EBM.
Please do this research

>  I guess

Yes these guessing of yours need not be, there is enough HARD facts to show you the benefits of OPEN source against Patenting.
That is self evident what you asked me

[utilitarian]

>conventiently

Its spelled conveniently

I noticed how you dont know a single thing about the Patent office,REAL case files, EBM and i cant find your R and D any where.

>  I guess

Yes these guessing of yours need not be, there is enough HARD facts to show you the benefits of OPEN source against Patenting.
That is self evident what you asked me

WTF, a spelling flame?  Are you really stooping that low? You should reread your last few posts before you start down that road.

So, tell me, where in the world is even a single EBM device being used to generate energy, besides, allegedly, at EBM's headquarters?  Surely their device must be in use somewhere, after all these years in the business.

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

One question.  When is the last time you have heard of a company, any company, file a patent lawsuit to prevent someone else from manufacturing a free energy device?

Compare that to the normal amount of patent lawsuits out there.  Keep in mind how a patent lawsuit comes about:

1.  Someone is using a technology, usually to make money.
2.  Someone else says, "Aha, that technology is close to my technology"
3.  That someone else sues.

Notice how that is not happening here.

You missed the boat.

The Patent doesn't get that far, and if it does, its still vulnerable to other weaknesses, not only this , its the method of DISCLOSING IT, which is what the metaphor for the patent is, where as open sourcing allows security and ensures dissemination, and also as we prove again this is stated to remind every one, can still make money.  The point he was making, is the FREE ENERGY patent doesn't get that far, in marketing, in manufacture, and at OTHER levels, look at the document i posted.Plus it opens up un necessary interference from other factions, not only this, but many other things.

Therefore, with FREE ENERGY technology, the scales still favor open source