Power from repelling magnets

[norman6538]

I'm making slow progress because I have 2 unresolved medical problems and now my wife needs surgery too. I made about  20 different versions combining 1. my work 2. Lafonte balancing, 3. some Floor ideas too. They must be robust/strong and precise or it will not perform. I'm looking ahead to harvesting the power out. If things don't fall apart here at home I expect performance numbers midweek next week. But that will not be power fed back in.

Please be patient, you will like what you see.
Norman

[ayeaye]

Norman, it may not be for you the right time to do these things. Things are exciting but, only these can do these things who can afford the time. I think you better wait when your problems pass, then there will be time.

[lancaIV]

http://www.geocities.ws/k_pullo/
Probably of interest  ! If not : delete it  !

[ayeaye]

http://www.geocities.ws/k_pullo/
Probably of interest  ! If not : delete it  !

This seems to be similar to my theory, see my drawing  https://ia800903.us.archive.org/22/items/Flcm4/pmmbp12.jpg  and the experiment i did  https://archive.org/details/Flcm3  that seemed to show overunity, only it was done by hand and the peak force also felt by hand. So anyone can repeat it to see for oneself, but properly it should be replicated with triggering independent of the hand movement, and the force measured by a pressure sensitive resistor. The overunity there were, if true, was not great enough though to overcome friction.

My general idea is, that an asymmetric field may do continuous work. Magnetic field is asymmetric field because it has two poles. However, like if we model it with a Gilbert or Coulumb model, the sum of energy when modeling my experiment will most likely be zero. But the matter is, the real magnetic fields differ from the Gilbert model, maybe in that the field lines between the two poles are more parallel to the axis between the poles. And such field likely is asymmetric enough to do continuous work.

Then furthermore, the overunity, if any, may be caused by the fact that the electrons in a dipole don't fall to the nucleus, even when they do work. I also showed the reason why this energy supposed to come from the zero point energy. This electrons orbiting the nucleus is also what makes the magnetic field asymmetric, that is having two poles. And this applies everywhere where the magnetic dipoles are involved, in permanent magnets, solid state devices, and even mechanical devices, as the magnetic interaction between atoms causes elasticity.

That said, overunity may not be anything special. When we drop an object, the gravitational field does work, where this energy comes from? Then it may also come from zero point energy, and when we lift the object, we work against the field and the energy goes back to zero point energy. So it may not be about overunity, just a way how to get continuous work, and this requires an asymmetric field.

Though regardless how the overunity may occur in permanent magnets, it is likely always caused by the fact that the magnetic field is asymmetric (has two poles). Another effect that this Lafonte, citfta, etc, show, it that it is theoretically possible for a pole of another magnet to move between two poles perpendicularly to the axis between the poles, without encountering any force at all. This is also due to the fact that the magnetic field is asymmetric, and has two poles. And that said last is true even in the Gilbert or Coulumb model. Unfortunately though, as it appeared in measurements in the citfta experiment, for some reason in practice it is very difficult to approach this theoretical zero force even nearly.

[lancaIV]

Probably this inventor and artist shows and discuss " fuel free magnetic device"-s :
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=9918