Heins' new videos and few corrections

[nix85]

Heins uploaded 8 new videos and so i'll comment on it.

Firstly i believe his generators/motors do as he says and that effect is achieved by increased inductance which delays the lenz response at high enough speed....but how he explains it is flawed in various ways, some maybe intentionally.

Firstly, to remove his main nonsense, he claims infinite efficiency and yet claims his devices are not perpetual motion. His argument for this is that power produced would have to be stepped down in frequency to feed it back into the system "and thus it is not perpetual..". Total nonsense which i attribute to desire to distance from such term with negative connotations.

One of his main points is that his generators can "reduce needed mechanical power input by 80%.". For example in his prospect for 1 megawatt ReGenex generator he says both conventional and his 1MW generator need ~0.5MW to keep them spinning at no load (idle), and that at full load conventional generator needs 1.5 or 2MW to output 1MW while his needs even less than idle, around 0.4MW.

Despite obvious claim of 0.6MW above unity he sticks to ridiculous claim of 80% power input reduction. His main "argument" appeares to be that his generator cannot be closed looped which makes no sense, even if we account for all the losses of stepping down of frequency, 0.6MW of free energy is enough to keep the system self fed.

Now that i put that to rest, see how he explains the principle. Screenshot from the video below
depicts the comparison of load current sinewave for conventional vs regenex generator.

https://youtu.be/4cCx-AvyaD8?t=504

You will notice he placed the polarity change at the peak of the current. This is wrong. He says it clearly in the vid "when rotor magnet is top dead center to the coil's core is when voltage and current is max", this is actually when voltage and current are ZERO.

I mean this is basic stuff, look at voltage when magnets are in dead centers of the coils.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jaIHJUf110

In this new video he claims "no energy is used to establish the magnetic field", yet obviously current is flowing from the battery.

He then claims only power dissipation is the copper losses and that only work being done electrically is generation of heat. He further claims if magnet was removed, same amount of energy would be consumed and that as heat only.

He apparently forgets the Laplace law F = ILxB describing force on a conductor in a magnetic field, as load increases, current in the conductor must increase to balance the forces: I = F/BL.

This means if magnet was removed or if mercury was replaced with some less dense liquid of same conductivity, less energy would be consumed. If this was not true all conventional motors would be overunity which they are clearly not.

Now i am not saying this cannot be bypassed, it clearly can if we are to believe him which i do, but his claim is off.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cbr3zyu0ojk

[lancaIV]

Thank you,for information !


https://de.slideshare.net/PDiCEOThaneHeins3240/thane-heins-bio-and-technology-background


Also here it is written : 80% less input related conventional drive input


It would be a great step !


As in-wheel generator,as small wind/solar heat pressure/water converter and ic-engine-genset !


Or as motor-generator


About the efficiency gains from RegenX coils in electric motors nothing is to read



https://patents.google.com/patent/US20140253271A1/en reading this reminds capacitive coil reactive transformer from Dr. .... Pavel Imris


With a purely resistive load on the BiTT the primary power factor is virtually zero and the efficiency of the energy transfer is increased accordingly. If for example, the transformer primary power factor is reduced by 30% the transformer efficiency is also increased by 30%. As well as the applications mentioned above, this transformer can also be applied in chargers and in electric vehicles between the generator and the batteries and between the batteries and the motor.




Sincerely


OCWL


p.s.: being sceptical about number use https://www.qmpower.com/  up to less 80% power input


       but by  comparison with


      https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2018183783&tab=PCTDESCRIPTION


For example, refrigeration fan motors in a low wattage range, e.g. 4 to 16 watts, used in both the commercial and residential refrigeration markets, have traditionally been low efficiency, such as around 12%-26% efficient. It would be desirable to provide technologies to address enhancements required in different classes of motors.

[nix85]

I got those slideshares, that is where i quote from. Point is infinite efficiency and 80% less input do NOT mix.

[nix85]

Slides

[nix85]

Raymond Kromrey generator, acceleration under load.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7jrTj1lk1U