Cyril Smith AKA Smudge builders group

[Smudge]

Hi EM,
You said

Many machines that have shown Above Unity Results have no Core Material, thus having no core.

We are dealing here with electromagnetic machines, and I know of no such OU machine that does not have some magnetic material, either as a core or as a permanent magnet.  It is within those materials that I see the possibility of extracting energy from the perpetual movements that take place inside atoms.  I mentioned only cores as the discussion was for transformers.

The only Polarisation and thus the only Precession that can occur is in the Copper Coils.

That's a bold statement that I would ask you to justify.  If you have studied atomic physics you will know that under space quantization there are a number of different parameters that are quantized to take on certain values, such as electron energy, orbital angular momentum vector, spin angular momentum vector, additional quantization of the vector sum of the orbital and spin vectors, magnetic quantum numbers restricting the permitted directions of the orbital and spin angular momentum vectors to the direction of an applied magnetic field.  Those permitted directions under these quantum rules force the orbital and spin vectors to precess around the applied magnetic field.  Thus precession is inherent in all atoms.

There are some people (like Joe Newman) who believe that their OU is due to precession in copper atoms, but I do not hold that view.  IMO it comes from precession within the permanent magnet's atoms. 

When you have written the paper, or even some simple instructions, I will do the experiments you would like to see Smudge!

Thanks, I will start a new board for that.

I must ask, Smudge, would you mind giving reasons for the immediate ruling out of:

   1: Waves and Standing Waves in these machines.
   2: Floyd Sweet said: "Energy is a kind of Matter", you seem to avoid these ideas? Einstein's Mass Energy Equivalence.

Clearly machines can have waves and standing waves, but I don't see these themselves as a practical source of anomalous energy.  When these waves exist in materials other than in free space then I do see the possibility of extracting energy from the quantum world that governs atomic spectra.  Not from any synchronization with the wave number inherent in the Schrodinger wave equation, but with the much different wave number of the precessions.  I am familiar with Einstein's mass energy equivalence but I don't care to think of energy flow as mass flow.  To convert energy to mass you have to divide by c² which is close to 10¹⁷, so the equivalent mass for our practical energies is incredibly small.  There is another form of equivalent inertial mass, sometimes referred to as electrostatic mass or electrodynamic mass.  If there are electrodynamic forces on an electron determined by its acceleration, you can imagine the true inertial mass to have an additional component.  This is true for an electron accelerating within an electric scalar potential.   It is also true for a magnetic pole accelerating within a magnetic scalar potential.

When you mention "Source" and "Sink", isn't this, by definition, Positive Current and Negative Current? Please see the Argand Diagram Below. Floyd Sweet also said: "Similarly, if we take a mass with a gravity field around it and we move the mass and create a mass current, a new field is also created. It is a different kind of gravity field with no source and no sink.", I know, slightly different, but the same ideas are incorporated.

What I don't understand is this talk of positive current and negative current as though they are different things.  Current is current and it can flow in different directions.  So what!  The direction of current flow is not the direction of energy flow, so perhaps some people find this mystifying, but I do not.  There is other talk of positive and negative electricity: in positive electricity current flow heats a conductor whereas in negative electricity current flow cools a conductor.  That is a different "positive" and "negative" and nothing to do with the direction of the current.

I believe you missed the point where I said, Current Amplification but fixing the Voltage Drop issue. The Voltage Drop was the problem others and myself had seen, but I show how to avoid this, to solve this problem in my last set of videos. So it now becomes possible to see Voltage and a Current Magnification.

I have not yet examined your videos so I can't comment .

Smudge   

[kolbacict]

Many machines that have shown Above Unity Results

And are there such?

[EMJunkie]

Thank You Smudge for your reply.

I agree with Joe Newman, I believe Ed Leedskalnin was another, each Terminal having Magnets of opposite polarity coming out from each Electrical Terminal. Just one of his very simple experiments proposed in hie paper: "Edward Leedskalnin Magnetic Current".

Now I will tell you what magnetic current is. Magnetic current is the same as electric current is a wrong expression. Really it is not one current; they are two currents, one current is composed of North Pole magnets and the other is composed of South Pole individual magnets in concentrated streams, and they are running one stream against the other stream in swirling, screw-like fashion, and with high speed. One current alone if it be North Pole magnet current or South Pole magnet current cannot run alone. To run one current will have to run against the other.

Now I will tell you how the currents are running when they come out of a car battery, and what they can do. Now get the equipment. First put a wooden box on the floor, open side up, cut two notches in middle so you can put a one-eighth of an inch thick and 18-inch long copper wire across the box. Put the wire one end East, the other West. Stay yourself West, put car battery South side of the box positive terminal East, negative terminal West, get two flexible leads and four clips to fit the battery and the bare copper wire, connect the East end of the copper wire with positive terminal, clip the West end of the copper wire with the West end of the copper wire with the West end flexible lead, leave the connection with negative terminal open.

Break two pieces of the steel fishing line one inch long, put each piece by middle across the copper wire, one on top of the copper wire and the other under, hold with your fingers, now touch the negative terminal with the loose clip, hold until the copper wire gets hot. Take them off; now you have two magnets, hand them up by the middle with fine thread. The upper magnet will hang the way it is now, but the one below will turn around. Break 5 inches long piece of the fishing line, put the middle of the wire across and on top of the copper wire, touch the battery, hold until the copper wire gets hot, dip the middle of the wire in iron filings, then you will see how long a magnet can be made with this equipment.

Break or cut several pieces of the hard steel fishing as long as to go between the poles of the U-shape magnet, now hold two pieces of the steel wire ends up and down, one wire South side of the copper wire, and the other North side, the lower ends just below the copper wire. Hold tight and touch the battery, hold until the copper wire gets hot, now hand them up by upper end just above the copper wire, touch battery, the South side magnet will swing South, and the North side magnet will swing North. Put two pieces on top of the copper wire, the ends just a little over the copper wire. Those ends lying on copper wire, one pointing South and the other North, hold tight, touch battery, hold until the copper wire gets hot, take off the one pointing South is South Pole magnet and the one pointing North is North pole magnet. Put one wire on top of the copper wire pointing South, other below pointing North. Magnetize, hang up by tail ends on the copper wire, touch battery, they both will swing South. Put one wire on tip of the copper wire pointing North, the other below pointing South, magnetize, hand up by tail end above the copper wire, touch the battery, both magnets will swing North.

It is easy to argue with such simplicity, but unless we have a better experimentally proven experiment to prove this wrong, then why would we?

Again, to me, this configuration is closely mimicking the Superconductor.

Like I posted, the Electron itself is a Standing Wave, Image below, so the Charge of the Electron, being that it is a Standing Wave, must therefore propose on a larger scale, the Standing wave can be made to do the same thing, creating a Charge in Space where there wasn't one.

Some are looking at exactly what I am trying to point out. Very interesting article here:

CONFIRM A NEW SOURCE OF ENERGY FROM THE STARS

Researchers manage to demonstrate a strange quantum effect from which it is possible to extract a huge amount of energy
In a world where energy is everything, the finding of an international team of researchers could open the way to the exploitation of a new and almost inexhaustible energy source. The secret is to control a rare type of quantum reaction that takes place in the stars, predicted four decades ago but that until now could not be demonstrated.

In an article published in Nature, scientists from the Australian National University (ANU) and other institutions, including the United States Army Research Laboratory or the National Center for Nuclear Research in Poland, explain how they have achieved, for the first time , confirm the existence of the phenomenon known as Nuclear Excitation by Electron Capture (NEEC).

The phenomenon takes place in the heart of the stars and could be, in addition to a new energy source of incalculable potential, the key mechanism through which stars, throughout their evolution, manage to produce elements as heavy as gold or platinum. NEEC happens when an atom captures an electron. If the energy of motion of the electron (kinetics) and the energy required to capture it are given in the proper ratio, then the atom goes into a higher excited state. This increase in energy, however, has a high cost for the atom, which drastically reduces its life expectancy.

In other words, what was once a stable and long-lived nucleus becomes an overexcited nucleus and, therefore, must seek a new state of rest, either through an electromagnetic process known as internal conversion that forces an electron to "spit" out, either emitting a photon. The process was first described in the 70s of the last century, but until now no one had been able to prove its existence in the laboratory. Something that the authors of the Nature article have done.

To achieve this, the researchers turned to the ANU Heavy Ion Accelerator and the ATLAS accelerator at the Argonne National Laboratory in the United States. With those instruments, they created an exotic isotope, molybdenum 93, by "firing" beams of zirconium atoms at lithium nuclei. The resulting molybdenum atoms shot out at 10% the speed of light (about 30,000 km per second) to crash into the remaining lithium, leaving in its wake a series of highly charged ions.

In addition to the cosmological implications, confirmation of the NEEC effect makes access to the energy stored in longer-lived isomer nuclei possible. Lane suggests that the technique could, for example, create energy sources 100,000 times more powerful than current chemical batteries. "Our study," says the researcher, "has shown a new way of releasing stored energy in a long-lasting nuclear state, which the US Army Research Laboratory is interested in exploring further."

Ref: https://www.unmundodemisterio.com/home/confirman-una-nueva-fuente-de-energa-procedente-de-las-estrellas

All processes occurring directly between the Electrons inside the Insulated Copper wire and the Nucleus of the Copper Atom, on the Scale we are working with. Again, if you read my posts, Accelerating the Electron, under Electromagnetic Force, making it pop up to Higher Orbitals, then it spits out a Photon, and if there is 7.3 trillion of them, well we do have something to power many things then don't we...

An Interesting Read: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/364/6435/62.full

The Space-Quanta Modulated Mark 1 Static Alternator

Laboratory experiments dealing with magnetic fields support the concept that magnetic flux may be modulated by low level oscillatory means. However there is no lateral movement of flux. Rather, what happens is that the individual packets of quanta are polarized by the initiating and sustaining coherent force the field of the primary magnets or in special cases, electromagnets.

As the low level oscillatory frequency (modulating frequency) from the oscillators pass through zero reversing polarity during . The quanta, being polarized, flip in synchronism with the modulating frequency, presenting a change in flux polarity varying with time determined by the period of the oscillator frequency.

Stationary field and stationary stator coils are featured in the machine. Except for a possible low level 60 Hz hum, the alternator is noise-less. There are no bearings or moving parts.

The feedback loop: Previously mentioned, you will more clearly see how the loop functions at the time you see the physical construction of the stationary armature of stator assembly. The underlying principal (forget Millikan's experiment) has been derived in that magnetic effects vary on the square of the current. As the load on the machine increases, the volt-ampere product increases. The rate of flow of charges increases.

Quantum mechanics state not all electrons in copper are free to carry charges. Then it's time to set the wheels in motion to free them from binding magnetic forces.

Once this is done, conductivity will improve and resistance decrease as we are dealing only with electrons. Copper will not change to another metal as atoms which are mostly empty space would have many electrons to spare anyway.

To free enough electrons to effect conversion would require magnetic forces approaching infinity.

The current and potential windings require relatively little power, and are applied in such a manner that rate of flow of moving charges may be accelerated beyond 1 ampere = 6.24 elestrons per ⁄ second. Thus the duty factor of the copper changes.

Losses diminish and more charges drawn from the now coherent space field flow at a faster rate as current to the load. This means as more current is required by varying loads more feedback magnetomotive forces free more electrons from binding forces complimented by potential magnetic forces of the orientated, coherent space field.

My Research leads me to believe Floyd Sweet spent every effort to concentrate on the Charge contained In-Side the Insulated Copper Wire, specifically the Cu Atom. To Free this Charge, then to make this Charge Move. Don Smith the same: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPvRWevd9V0 The Evidence is not just overwhelming, its self evident don't you think? I mean, it is this Charge we observe, we measure and we consider; Energy, but ony when this Charge is Moving! V x I, Voltage = 1 Volt = 1 Coulomb of Charge, I = 6.24 x 10¹⁸ Electrons per second past point P equaling One Ampere. Which can only be accessed if we strip off the Insulation from the Terminals of the Copper Wire.

Sorry Smudge, I don't see why this all seems so impossible, especially when all My Experiments support and prove this? I see so much resistance from others for the most obvious things and get quite frustrated sometimes.

It is easy to disagree with me and my theories, but like I said, there is some theory missing, or we would already have the tech and not be having this conversation!

Members on my forum are already well aware of this information.

Best wishes, stay safe and well,
   Chris Sykes

P.S: Floyd Sweet analogy of Spin Integer Changing, Energy Levels Changing, below and an example of an Air Core Energy Machine is posted below:

[EMJunkie]

I feel strongly, the above information I posted is extremely important information!

If the right Theory and the right Techniques were applied to the right Medium, then the Successes would no doubt skyrocket in this field!

Best wishes, stay safe and well,
   Chris Sykes

[EMJunkie]

Smudge, if i may, a question: If the Energy comes from the Core, then whats the Transfer Mechanism from the Core Material, past the Insulation, into the Conducting Copper Wire?

Best wishes, stay safe and well,
   Chris Sykes