Towards A Complete Maxwell's Daemon System

[onepower]

As I said, I read most of Faraday's lectures and his description of Maxwell's demon predates it by many years. Just as Einstein did not discover relativity and De Broglie's work predates it by many years.

You cannot just Google this, lol,  you have to actually read all the literature written in the authors own words and follow the time lines. However that would require work and due diligence which seems to be lacking in this new age of alternative facts.

For example, did you know Faraday actually described how free energy could work and basically nailed it?. Did you know Faraday also gave a very detailed description of what Gravity is and how it works?.

Sounds like you boys need to do a little more reading and a little less googling. I would also point out google is a joke, it gives the most popular links not the most accurate. This is not a popularity contest.

You owe it to yourself to read Faraday and Amperes original work. These guys were absolutely brilliant and laid the foundation for electrodynamics and free energy. Weber's work also includes the longitudinal force which Faraday and Ampere could not reconcile in there work.

Regards

[onepower]

D3xor
You said the spaces between galaxies may not be immersed in an electromagnetic field.

I would ask, how would we know the galaxy was even present?. The only reason we can detect a galaxy is because it radiates EM waves. Thus we can say as a fact the space between the galaxy and our detectors must have contained EM waves... otherwise we could not have detected it in the first place.

So when you claimed a galaxy exists you are also claiming we detected its existence proving EM waves were radiating in every direction from it, some of which we detected. To claim otherwise is a complete break down of logic and reason.

Do you understand?, the fact we can see or detect any other object in the universe proves the space between everything must contain EM waves otherwise we could not detect its existence.

So not only is your claim false but a clear violation of the COE and basic reasoning. In effect, you directly contradicted yourself.

Regards

[lancaIV]

Gerhard Beier ,Engineer ( and seemingly ex-GDR-spion, alias Vita " Werner Wendt")

DE102018008797
C.O.P. 10 by graphene nano plates ?

[d3x0r]

D3xor
You said the spaces between galaxies may not be immersed in an electromagnetic field.

I would ask, how would we know the galaxy was even present?. The only reason we can detect a galaxy is because it radiates EM waves. Thus we can say as a fact the space between the galaxy and our detectors must have contained EM waves... otherwise we could not have detected it in the first place.

So when you claimed a galaxy exists you are also claiming we detected its existence proving EM waves were radiating in every direction from it, some of which we detected. To claim otherwise is a complete break down of logic and reason.

Do you understand?, the fact we can see or detect any other object in the universe proves the space between everything must contain EM waves otherwise we could not detect its existence.

So not only is your claim false but a clear violation of the COE and basic reasoning. In effect, you directly contradicted yourself.

Regards

Edit: I find I'll end up walking back on this in the future; I haven't refined my view to include absolutely everything; certain EM fields do have magnetic component or induction in coils wouldn't work... but then is that the same force as hitting a photonic sensor like a solar cell/cmos sensor?

I didn't say 'immersed in electromagnetic field' I said 'magnetic field'....


EM fields are not magnetic fields, nor static fields, but as their name says electro-magnetic and as such are a hybrid.


There's no contradiction, merely an assumption I was talking about something I wasn't.


EM Fields are affected by magnetic fields ( https://youtu.be/Kp_kqamkYpw?t=476 )
Photons travelling through empty space are not an do not make a magnetic field.[/size]
EM Fields are not measured in Joules or Teslas.


I appreciate the recommendation to read information, and as you said google is bad, so rather than just saying 'read things' maybe you can provide a link to something useful?
I did find Eric Dollard[size=78%]'s lone pine writings quite enlightening; which goes back to Maxwell and Faraday's equations[/size]




@lancaIV,
re 'DE102018008797'  I'm not sure where this number is meaningful, even with the name Gerhard Beier I don't find anything with said (patent?) number

[lancaIV]

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20200514&CC=DE&NR=102018008797A1&KC=A1


translated :
http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=abstract-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=102018008797&SRCLANG=DE&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&TRGLANG=en


description translated :


http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=102018008797&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=en