RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

[WhatIsIt]

Take a shelterr from the storm!

[WhatIsIt]

About that cop 1.7?

Is it possible that they measured cop 1.7 on wrong side, source side?

Mistakes happened before.
It is nothing unusual.

[v8karlo]

No,


There is scientific method of measurement.


They look straight to bulb for half an hour,
then measure time how long they are blind.


It can vary with color of eyes, but not much.


There is copy paste salesman down the hall, and rain of BS,
at least there is no rain here.


Nice place you have here.
You painted the walls by yourself?

[partzman]

About that cop 1.7?

Is it possible that they measured cop 1.7 on wrong side, source side?

Mistakes happened before.
It is nothing unusual.

Well, now that you mention it, if one studies Chris' videos, it appears he is measuring only on the output stages with no consideration for the input.  Based on this observation, I built a test device around the info he has given publicly on an AMCC-200 metglas core and the best COP was ~.7 that is Pout/Pin. 

I challenge any claims he or his group has regarding self runners or COP=1.7 or anything >COP=1!

Regards,
Pm

[WhatIsIt]

3 independent replications of bucking coil experiment.

All 3 resulted in cop < 1

1. Partzman
2. Gear
3. Myself

Partzman and Gear are experienced researchers and I have no doubt in their results.

In my case, I looped output to source, feedback line.
Then I measured power on source and feedback line,
which resulted in very poor cop, much less than 1,
and I was thinking that I did something wrong in assembly of device,
so I was not sure if I made device correctly.