Should “energy” be redefined?

[lancaIV]

US5252176

e= m x c?
Nernst Waermetheorem

Bethe-Weizsaecker- or CNO-  Zyklus/cycle involved ?

How much Joule/calori per Watt ?

US8059946
+ the citing documents study from  espacenet and google f.e. CN application the description

and Henson/Cletus Williams devices  internal process ( hypothetical description ) comparison



Focus,focussieren / expansion/compression time/space in volume and velocity and speed

specific difference between Raumzeit/Space-Time and Zeitraum/Time-Space



Beside Physics- Nobel-Award in Stockholm same important  in Germany for Theoretical Physics the " Max Planck"-Medaille and for Experimental Physics the "Stern-Gerlach"-Medaille


Really entertaining is the discussion between Dr.Werner Heisenberg and Dr.Carl Friedrich von Weizsaecker 1966
             Theme : "Quanten-(Welt)Modell "included " ure  "-Nano-Welt-Atome--point of view



A little Nernst thermochemistry ( light effect ) + Heisenberg's magnetism and Bethe-Weizsaecker Zyklus quantitativ paaren with DD271578 to DD272727 and we get a huge 'focal point'-power source !

Orbital solar farmes sending by 'focal point' photonic energy to earth receiver,  photon to heat to electric converter

maritim saltwater to water/salt to hydrogen/oxygen decomposition platforms

industrial torch

or as military device (s-)melting weapons : vaporizer,plasmonizer

[seychelles]

GRAVITY IS THE REAL ENERGY MECHANISIM IN THIS UNIVERSE. MOST ENERGY IS GENERATED BY
BLACK HOLES. EVERY GALAXIES HAVE A BLACK HOLE IN THEIR CENTRES. IT IS THERE TO RECYCLE THE OLD STARS AND PLANETS
AT THE SAME TIME THEY CREATE A SWIRLING IN ETHER THAT CREATE TIME. TIME IS RATE OF CHANGE . OR MOVEMENT THROUGHT SPACE.
EVERY STARS ARE THE ASS HOLES OF THE BLACK HOLES. ENERGY IS EQUAL TO MASS TRAVELLING TWICE THE SPEED OF LIGHT. ALL THAT THE
BLACK HOLES GOBBLE IS ACCELERATED TWICE FASTER THAN LIGHT ALL THE ELEMENTARY MATTERS IS DISASSEMBLED ATOMICALY TO HYDROGEN  HELLIUM. LITHIUM. BERYLIUM ECT.

[lancaIV]

Natural chemical/physical  versus enforced    elementare " Halb-Wert-Zeit" = elementary decay

Related Mendelejew(- Meyer) Period-System/-Tafel,-Tabel

Related ' atomic chemistry':
Jean Pierre Marie Chambrin REACTOR TO TRANSMUTE THE MATTER f.a. as WO8204096
from elements,stable to isotopes,un-/stable


1 input calori 100 x ,1000 x,100 000 x   multiplyer : dependence = ' ... cooling ..." from the device and internal process

Btw : is gravitation force linear straigth ,curvativ,ccw or cw ?

[sm0ky2]

GRAVITY IS THE REAL ENERGY MECHANISIM IN THIS UNIVERSE. MOST ENERGY IS GENERATED BY
BLACK HOLES. EVERY GALAXIES HAVE A BLACK HOLE IN THEIR CENTRES. IT IS THERE TO RECYCLE THE OLD STARS AND PLANETS
AT THE SAME TIME THEY CREATE A SWIRLING IN ETHER THAT CREATE TIME. TIME IS RATE OF CHANGE . OR MOVEMENT THROUGHT SPACE.
EVERY STARS ARE THE ASS HOLES OF THE BLACK HOLES. ENERGY IS EQUAL TO MASS TRAVELLING TWICE THE SPEED OF LIGHT. ALL THAT THE
BLACK HOLES GOBBLE IS ACCELERATED TWICE FASTER THAN LIGHT ALL THE ELEMENTARY MATTERS IS DISASSEMBLED ATOMICALY TO HYDROGEN  HELLIUM. LITHIUM. BERYLIUM ECT.

Does E=mgh in the Earth's gravitational field?


We certainly can measure and compare potential energy across a field gradient
This one being vectored upwards
Such knowledge allows for the use of pulleys and levers.
We consider it to be conservative.


But what if there are two fields, with different properties?


One defined as an acceleration force with a time constant.
The other defined as a constant force, irrespective of time.


How does this change the scenerio?
What is the potential energy of an object suspended within these two fielda?


———————————————




Now - when we use our hands, we apply constant force
When we lift something, we can hold it still with constant force
Defined by the objects weight. Irrespective of time.


Gravity, on the other hand, accelerates the object every second


Why is it then, that our constant force can balance out the acceleration force?


——————————————


Pause now to think about this.


——————————————-


Here in this video:


Is shown a simple pulley & lever system
With the addition of a magnetic repulsion field at the fulcrum


Here is demonstrated that two opposing E=mgh energy quanties
are not equivalent when one of them interacts with two different fields.


The weight on the left being 57 grams lighter than the weight it is lifting
The same distance.




https://youtu.be/xOBZsCWMDzI
(video shared by {edit} Synchro1)


—————————————————


Gravity is accelerating the two masses, and the constant force is applied at the fulcrum


This is the inverse of the archer quinn device, where in the constant force is applied at
the near horizontal, and gravity accelerates at the at end of the lever.


—————————————————-


Now think about the situation after the motion:


We have an extra 57 grams lifted to a height (defined arbitrarily by the mechanics)
and this requires 57 grams added to break the heavy mass free.


Note that the additional 57 grams only needs to be lifted the radius of
the effective magnetic interaction.*


The mass now has an E=mgh in excess of the input of 57 grams at whatever height we choose
minus 2x the radius of the magnetic interaction on your h value.

[Floor]

' ' '