Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Lords of the Ring

Started by giantkiller, January 06, 2007, 11:53:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

innovation_station

To understand the action of the local condenser E in fig.2 let a single discharge be first considered. the discharge has 2 paths offered~~ one to the condenser E the other through the part L of the working circuit C. The part L  however  by virtue of its self induction  offers a strong opposition to such a sudden discharge  wile the condenser on the other hand offers no such opposition ......TESLA..

THE !STORE IS UP AND RUNNING ...  WE ARE TAKEING ORDERS ..  NOW ..   ISTEAM.CA   AND WE CAN AND WILL BUILD CUSTOM COILS ...  OF   LARGER  OUTPUT ...

CAN YOU SAY GOOD BYE TO YESTERDAY?!?!?!?!

innovation_station

To understand the action of the local condenser E in fig.2 let a single discharge be first considered. the discharge has 2 paths offered~~ one to the condenser E the other through the part L of the working circuit C. The part L  however  by virtue of its self induction  offers a strong opposition to such a sudden discharge  wile the condenser on the other hand offers no such opposition ......TESLA..

THE !STORE IS UP AND RUNNING ...  WE ARE TAKEING ORDERS ..  NOW ..   ISTEAM.CA   AND WE CAN AND WILL BUILD CUSTOM COILS ...  OF   LARGER  OUTPUT ...

CAN YOU SAY GOOD BYE TO YESTERDAY?!?!?!?!

FreeEnergy

Quote from: innovation_station on March 27, 2007, 04:06:30 PM
the pics of the test i did last night as i said i would post

is

how are you hooking those wires up exactly?

giantkiller

Here's an additional piece of info:
The GK4 has 18awg bailing/iron wire collectors and 30awg copper controls. By winding at 90 degrees the maximum amount of material interface is met between 2 dissimilar metals.


Jdo300

Quote from: innovation_station on March 27, 2007, 02:56:56 PM
i must start collecting materials but what would reccomend for the caps? i have some small ones and varous uf but my laque of knowalge with caps and transistors is my biggest problem

is

Well, for what we want, my thought is that we want to use a somewhat high value cap (because we want to smack the coil, not oscillate with it). Also, a decent voltage wouldn't be a bad thing.

Since it seems that the coils on the open TPU are farely short, that means that it would require a small value cap (< 1 uF) to resonate with the coil. But again, it depends on the frequency that you pulse the coil with. Though, as a rough guess (based on my personal experiments alone), I always use a 1000 uF electrolytic cap that's rated for 100V. They are small and can be found in power supplies (actually the power supply caps hold more voltage). Plus, if you look at the caps in the 17 inch TPU, you can tell that they are electrolytic also.

BTW, thought I would share with you all a simple experiment I did recently with my 555 pulse circuit, the aforementioned cap, and a 1:1 toroidal transformer. First, I had the cap continuously charged from my 20V 500mA DC power supply. From there, the cap was connected through a MOSFET into the primary side of my transformer. I used my 555 circuit to switch on and off the MOSFET which dumped the cap through the transformer. The secondary side of the transformer was connected through a bridge recrifier to a high voltage cap which my DMM was measuring the voltage on.

I noticed that when I tuned the frequency of the 555 timer just right, I got about 100-200V on the cap. But after I began to play with the duty cycle, thats when the fun started. The smaller the duty cycle on my square wave, the higher and higher the voltage on the secondary would climb. At one point, I managed to get it up as high as 400V+! Keep in mind that this was a weenie little 1:1 transformer not a step up transformer. The key to this was simply the on time of the wave! Also, I noticed that the steeper the rise and fall times of the wave the better the results as well. This is consistent with what Tesla observed.

So the faster we shut the switch on and off, the more radiant energy we get.

Oh, one more thing I should mention... The shorter rise times allowed my cap to stay charged to the same voltage without using much input current to maintain it... So in other words, the shorter the pulses, the less current you need to replenish your cap... Which means that you can take some of the output and use it to top off the cap without needing to keep it tied to a power supply.

God Bless,
Jason O

P.S. Caps also like high voltage spikes :-).