Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?

Started by TriKri, March 29, 2021, 06:27:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.


bistander

Quote from: Ilya Tsimbaluk on May 29, 2023, 04:06:32 PM
https://ext-5724308.livejournal.com/3244.html

Hi Ilya Tsimbaluk,
Interesting stuff following link. Only had part in English translation. Please answer following as I am unsure if it is just in translation.
Do you consider Ampere Force same as Lorentz Force?

I think the subject may be off_topic so don't wish to go into it in depth, but just curious as you mentioned both, together, several times.
QuoteFrom here I would like to return to the fact that the Ampere force or the Lorentz force provides for some instantaneous force, although Lifshitz and Landau say that this force still has a finite speed associated with the speed of light.
Thanks.
bi

Ilya Tsimbaluk

Greetings. The Ampere force as well as the Lorentz force are essentially the same force. it is just that the Ampere force and the Lorentz silt are differently represented mathematically

I'm on my way home right now after work...

Ilya Tsimbaluk

Okay, what do I need to recreate your experiment? The other day I proved the equation that gravity rests, in fact, on the equivalent of forces.

Hi. I decided to separate our correspondence into a separate document so that I can then translate and send it to you. For correspondence I like Telegram as messenger better than Facebook because of some conveniences.
But it's not critical.

Every amp has an equal and opposite amp, so the theory is easily provable
People just don't have a clear idea of the relationship between alternating current and voltage.

It's hard for me to say anything here because I'm not sure I understand you. But some points, I think, find some resonance. I would like to digress that it may well make sense to keep this correspondence open, or to be able to edit and put it in the public domain, I cannot yet say.

When we're talking about voltage, most likely. and I'm just expressing my point of view, not relying on any literature right now - we're talking about an electric field or some process in the Physical Vacuum, or the Aether... The term Aether and the Physical Vacuum is a separate topic of discussion. But we can define the electric field by its force interaction with a physical body - paper, dust particles, and so on. this force interaction between two bodies, where the connecting element is an intermediate medium in the form of Physical Vacuum or Aether, this force interaction is called the Coulomb Force.

If we consider the question of alternating field and tension, we have to go back to the time of Poynting and Heaviside. If we are considering the Coulomb force, its vector is directed along the conductor, the magnetic field strength H has a vector around the conductor, the voltage and magnetic field vectors have in space are parallel to each other.

When you talk about CURRENT, I personally perceive  CURRENT as a historical misunderstanding. The reason for the perception is that cathode rays, as a flux of light has not yet proved in the Thomson tube or the Crooks tube that cathode rays are some mass emitted by a conductor. This is one of the reasons for the failure of Tom Bearden's theory.

The current itself is a mass that comes from the medium deep into the conductor, a process we call the SKIN-EFFECT. But respectable people of old England would have found it difficult to imagine that the medium is represented by a mass in a certain state, which is difficult to touch. The only - this issue was considered by Heaviside, and then this effect was represented by the Casimir effect mass or energy as the equivalent of mass is distributed in a conductor (absorbed and emitted ) by quanta. Roughly materialistic notions. that were rampant in the Western community tried to tease out anything. that might have something to do with the medium not being empty and maybe further more... so it was easier to view the electron as a mass. which could move in wires, gases as a particle of a conductor or gas. but such views are a return to the old days and I could be accused of being stuck in the old days,

Milliken and Ioffe's experiment was an experiment that was similar to Coulomb's experiment.  Where an electric field was involved between the electrode of a capacitor and a dust particle, there was no direct evidence of such experiments, but since science was misdirected, it is necessary to correct this path.

The concept of CHARGE itself is the interaction of two bodies through an intermediate medium. 

But any mass, so that it can manifest itself, cannot be without a second mass, which is in some, I call scalar state - this force has no direction. Its state becomes scalar because of some kind of Brownian or chaotic movement of this mass in space. as soon as we try to create movement by a field, say, movement from one point to another, we meet some kind of resistance, because the electric field is a vector quantity. This mass or energy has its own ordered or already established motion. As soon as this ordered force or energy, the mass, moves, it tries to order this chaotically turbulent mass, which resists the former.

The relationship of ordered and disordered mass in the Physical Vacuum is a dynamic process. the first mass entrains the second, while the second prevents the second from moving into a chaotic state. These processes occur in complex physical bodies, as well as in the movement of energy in inductance.



Hence all the problems of the 70's and the wars that followed a colder ambition than the previous world war, started for the same technological reasons

You know, technology is not new. just for clarification. there is a lot to consider.
Adam
I found Steinmetz's equations to be the most enlightening in terms of getting electricity from the square -1. The point is that there is a real possibility that people will injure themselves before they even get to the creation of the device. That is my perception. Do you disagree or do you have any pointers?

I can see many stakes for many nations, heritage and culture, i.e. current equity investments, etc. So the reason God or universal law doesn't allow this to really become something is because of a lack of concern on the part of "interested" and "affected" parties.

This is a very important consideration because it prevents wars, the mysterious death of inventors, etc., etc.

It's hard for me to say right now what the reason is for not introducing Free Energy technologies into this life, there must be some reasons. The reasons include the aggressiveness of humanity and the moral side. Most likely corporations will also use these technologies for military purposes to exterminate their own kind.

Mankind itself is not yet that. the meaning of life is in the development, the abolition of their animal nature, which is trying to take over the consciousness of man. If humanity were to move forward, it would sooner or later purify that inner source, which is the generator of all properties, including infinite power.


[ps this is not an appeal or an imposed traumatic suggestion, just that I think freely of the many minds involved in this technology and its censorship from human minds].
Adam
Adam Bull
if there was a higher alien power that created the earth. i'm sure they would put signals or signs in the time line so things could be fixed when humanity was ready, kind of 😃
Adam
Adam Bull
hypothetically, if one were talking to aliens, they would create themes, or subjects, and then see how they are used in work, study, teaching, without any judgment about it other than the judgment that humans make, and then they would decide if that subject or theme is ready for humanity to play with other themes of consciousness. just hypothetically speaking. very strongly hypothetical.

I have heard that the Eastern European approach is the Sirius approach. We like that. Nevertheless, I suppose you have to get along with children in the West, too. Which is what you need most right now. Maybe I can ask a friend to help.
Adam
Adam Bull
Ilya? We can talk later if you're busy.

I'm convinced. that man does not need to fly off heavily with his thoughts toward Sirius) In fact, man himself is an internal component, including not only the animal part, but also the human part. Hence he has the presence of KARMA. All causes and effects on the outside are on the inside.

bistander

Quote from: Ilya Tsimbaluk on May 30, 2023, 03:42:39 PM
Greetings. The Ampere force as well as the Lorentz force are essentially the same force. it is just that the Ampere force and the Lorentz silt are differently represented mathematically
...

Thanks. I gather that in the context you used the terms, they were/are considered the same thing.
Regards.
bi

"silt"? Maybe translation again. But I am confused as to what Lorentz silt would refer to mathematically or conceptually.