Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?

[Ilya Tsimbaluk]

Greetings, as I understand it - this video is a preamble to the conversation...I think that just the transition from capitalism to socialism or communism, where mechanical and routine work will be replaced by other work - creative work, this is just what some philosophers in the USSR were raising questions about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPY5NIQsz2g&fbclid=IwAR3p9yQC2ro8ho5yKWohFY-bLb6Gl08IpVIqQBaQmulINGvkmKUkgsqc6s8
I think that if we take our minds off the iron, it might well make sense to fantasize a bit about this as well.
The question of creativity is a question of when a fantasy or an idea by a person passes through all the stages of consciousness towards the world, which you can feel, see...and overcoming obstacles is personal growth.

[Ilya Tsimbaluk]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESFl_Pd8Qa8

Hello. If we move back from philosophy to where society is headed at a time when the world is facing a crisis that requires a paradigm shift in philosophy, politics and thinking, I think it's a good time to talk about the iron.

I used to collect files here, but they are in Russian. Just there is a demonstration of a motor, it is shown that if the load of the generator is short-circuited by low output resistance, then when the circuit is open, the light bulb is an indicator - just the energy can be released stored energy from the winding.
also in brief. although in russian - demonstration of an experience with a flywheel-based setup.

There are complications in the actual installation. The classical engine has standard characteristics, in which the graph consists of the speed curve and the torque curve. At the intersection of such torque is just the point of maximum efficiency.

Therefore, if I continued to work on this experiment, I would most likely consider, as an option, an engine in which rollers could ride, as it was proposed by Searle. because through the mass, which is separated from each other by a magnetic field - it is as a flywheel as a store of kinetic energy, and there is some probability that the efficiency, due to application of superconductors and absence of friction will give a good result. But these are all guesses and hypotheses. For now, I can say that the installation requires its further development. For now I switched to installation of another kind. Although with the return to the battery or electric motor.

[onepower]

On transverse and longitudinal waves.

I found the biggest difference in perception is between those who do real experiments to prove a matter for themselves and those who simply follow others.

I found there is no such thing as a transverse wave and the sine form we see on our DSO isn't what's actually happening outside a conductor or antenna. For example, if we use a stick to measure the change in height versus time of a water wave we also see a sine wave form. An antenna is no different and all we are measuring is the change in induced voltage versus time. As such a wave is not something in itself only a disturbance of something already present. Logically, we cannot have a wave in water without first having water present. However many have been falsely led to believe space is empty and no transmission medium is required which is absurd. It begs the question, if a wave is defined as a disturbance of something then what exactly is being disturbed in any given space?.

Here most seem to have put the cart before the horse which is probably why nothing seems to make any sense.

Experimentally it's easy to prove the difference between what many mistake as a transverse wave and a longitudinal wave. Place some charged ping pong balls in a tube and move them back and forth in an alternating motion. The measured internal and external voltage will change showing a form similar to a sine wave. This is what many have been fooled into thinking is a transverse wave. Now place one of the charged ping pong balls into the tube and use compressed air to shoot it out like a gun. Here we see a single disturbance similar to a Soliton or longitudinal wave. However it's not a wave it's a mobile energy carrier which has become independent of the source which initially gave it energy. This is why simply measuring a supposed wave is at best a superficial observation if we ignore everything in between the cause and effect. 

As most of the great minds like Richard Feynman implied, we can discard 99% of the over complicated things most believe and use first principals. Here is a good link, https://jamesclear.com/first-principles

The human tendency for imitation is a common roadblock to first principles thinking. When most people envision the future, they project the current form forward rather than projecting the function forward and abandoning the form.

For instance, when criticizing technological progress some people ask, "Where are the flying cars?"

Here's the thing: We have flying cars. They're called airplanes. People who ask this question are so focused on form (a flying object that looks like a car) that they overlook the function (transportation by flight). This is what Elon Musk is referring to when he says that people often "live life by analogy."

Be wary of the ideas you inherit. Old conventions and previous forms are often accepted without question and, once accepted, they set a boundary around creativity.

It seems intuitive doesn't it?. Everyone is so preoccupied with trying to imitate everyone else they forgot to think for themselves. I felt a real connection with this article because it describes what I'm seeing. Imitation is not evolution, it's the opposite of evolution.

AC

[Ilya Tsimbaluk]

Greetings, friends. Now you have decided to raise some fundamental questions. I'm trying to figure out how the paradigm will change in the economy and society.

But at this point. I would like to talk about practical things as well. because the fact is that I am very surprised that the topic that I proposed with Mayanik as a more improved Joule experience, but through eectromagnetism, did not arouse such a lively interest. While I presented in articles calculations, formulas and not only.
I would like to understand the reasons.

I believe that the subject of the Joule experience I raised is described in a vague way because. I have time constraints to be able to publish a coherent and meaningful article here.

[kolbacict]

I am very surprised that the topic that I proposed with Mayanik as a more improved Joule experience, but through eectromagnetism, did not arouse such a lively interest.

Probably because most of people wants only to enjoy their own bodies in their earthly life.