Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



LET US ALL HELP RAYMOND BUILD THIS NEW FREE ENERGY MACHINE.

Started by seychelles, April 02, 2021, 11:42:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Floor

I would like to do a drawing of the device, but I'm short on time right now.

Floor

I seems that the maximum mechanical load upon the spinning motor, occurs when
the flip flopping magnets are in the mid range of their motion ?

Floor

Although Ray's device, is a mechanical device,  it is an oscillating / resonating device.

                 (very, very low frequency). 

In order for it to be efficient, it must operate at or near its resonant frequency.
                                     (the load must be matched)

kajunbee

Would be nice if he had power supply with higher resolution display. At such low power 2 ma is difference between success and failure. I imagine it's closer to .02 than .01 if I were to guess. That's also provided your calculations are correct, which I'm in no position to doubt. I'm not and expert either.

Floor

Quote from: kajunbee on April 10, 2021, 08:57:18 AM
Would be nice if he had power supply with higher resolution display. At such low power 2 ma is difference between success and failure. I imagine it's closer to .02 than .01 if I were to guess. That's also provided your calculations are correct, which I'm in no position to doubt. I'm not and expert either.

Doing these calculations, isn't exactly rocket science, as they say.
Its just a matter of interest in the subject matter and then doing the home work.
       But
Ya, a higher resolution in the power supply read out would be good.
             milliamps (0.010) rather than hundredths (0.01) of an amp

deci    1/10
centi   1/100
milli    1/1,000
micro  1/10,000
nano    1/100,00
pico     1/ 1,000,000

A more precise measurement of the lifting height would be easy to do.
If the lifting height is greater than 3/8 inch, then the mechanical wattage
is greater than I guesstimated.

I suggest giving Ray more time and support.

I would be more skeptical my self,  were it not for having seen work from magnets
by double the input and more.

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x728wd9

How ever, this does not negate the necessity for good science here or jumping
to conclusions prematurely.

Good find by seychelles, nice build by Ray, but more refinement needed
in the measurements and then replication.  I'm pretty sure Ray is already aware
of all of that.