LET US ALL HELP RAYMOND BUILD THIS NEW FREE ENERGY MACHINE.

[Floor]

Rays device / video here (the subject of this topic)

                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4J8uPhKwjG4

444 views per day on average of this topic.

Largely by lazy surfers and coach from the arm of their chair boys.
With some tiny bit of good criticism / observation here as well.
.............
344 views of this video below, as of today

                  https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x728wd9

Let see how many hits on it by tomorrow.
It's not monetized...
... ... ... ... ...
This is the / an,  add on / modification of this post ...

444 average no of views per day x 5 days = 2220

but now its up from 2220 to 3323 views.

About 1,100 more views of this topic since the immediately above part was posted today
(week end), but only 30 new views of the video (on daily motion).
    30  / 1,100 =  0.0272 
Lazy surfers indeed.

[MagnaProp]

I wonder if with different magnet geometry we can keep the "sticky" spot away from the flipper magnet and keep the useful part of the big magnet closer to the flipper?

Top view of a cylindrical magnet with the sticky spot where the poles meet cut out so the sticky spot is closer to the center and thus farther away from the flipper magnet. Green is a connecting metal rod as per Rays design to help reduce the sticky spot.

Right now Rays design is basically the opposite. The sticky spot gets closest to the flipper and the flat useful part is farthest away from the flipper.

[MagnaProp]

Side view.
Maybe the main magnet is just a cylinder without chunks cut out of it. Just a big piece of metal flashing put over the pole to reduce the stickiness? Green part being curved metal plating over the cylindrical magnet.

[kolbacict]

I don't know. A single motor only lifts the load.
But the load in the installation on the right rises and falls.
Work in this case is zero.

[Floor]

I don't know. A single motor only lifts the load.
But the load in the installation on the right rises and falls.
Work in this case is zero.

"But the load in the installation on the right rises and falls.
Work in this case is zero."

If I am understanding you correctly, you are saying that the coins
fall after being lifted ?

One of his earlier videos address this question to some extent.

A ONE WAY RATCHET on the lift pulley axle would eliminate that
work out cancellation.
... ... ... ... ...
The flip flop magnets are under power in both directions.
Only one of those directions is used in his design.
Using both the flip and the flop, would double the number of times
the weight is lifted in a given time period.
... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Using both the flip and the flop will increase the load on the input motor ?

But I would wager that there will be an increase in efficiency, if the weight lifted is
decreased by 30 to 40 percent, BUT also both of these outputs are used.
... ... ... ... ... ... ...