Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[Sergh]

The hysteresis moment M g does not depend on the rotor speed. A radical way to increase the torque of a hysteresis motor is the use of hard magnetic materials with a rectangular hysteresis loop. The rotation frequency of such an engine is synchronous with the rotation frequency of the field, the efficiency is high - up to 80% [2]

https://servomotors-ru.translate.goog/documentation/electromotor/book2/book2p7.html?_x_tr_sl=ru&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en
Table 13.6. Technical data of engines
G-31 efficiency 0,14 - 0,17
G-33 efficiency 0,21 - 0,24
G-34 efficiency 0,13 - 0,16

But it looks like some of hysteresis motors have a dark side.

"LIST OF DUAL-USE GOODS"
page 26 paragraph 10

Specially designed facilities for the separation of the isotopes of "natural uranium", "depleted uranium" and "special fissile materials" and components, as follows:..
10. Ring-shaped motor stators for high-speed multi-phase hysteresis (or reactive) AC motors for synchronous operation in vacuum conditions in the frequency range of 600-2000 Hz and in the power range of 50-1000 VA;

https://2009-2017.state.gov/strategictrade/documents/organization/166380.pdf

[stivep]

Actually, the promised patent application: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20040239118A1/en

O boy..................
In regards to picture from above
here is  the link:
https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/dlattach/attach/192466/image//
The energy consumed to lift the weight  is always "the same."
But if we  add to it  friction and weight of pullies than
the more pullies you have the more energy  you need to apply to  lift the weight, even if  it looks like   having 7 pullies  it is x/6  easier to lift it.
No Gain!!! only more losses
Energy consumed to lift the weight  using  series of pullies:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GuldysCVjI
By that  even if I didn't read the patent application  the concept in a  nonsense.
It is easy to look at  that application  history.

2003-05- 29 Application filed by LIN MAO CHANG
2003-05 29 Priority to US10/446,796
2003-05-29 Assigned to PENG, JUNG-CHING, LIN, MAO CHANG
2004-12-02 Publication of US20040239118A1
Status:
Abandoned 2005-06-30- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Comment: "No wonder why"
or in correct  English :
No wonder 80% places for  students in USA major educational  facilities are occupied
by wealthy  Chinese  kids, as their parents  rather prefer  American than Chinese education.

Wesley

[lancaIV]

#2803 :

No and I would never buy one GGOE,50/20/10 KW not my interest !Neither from Holcomb nor from airpower and other !

Public co-operative : partly 125 W participation,probably ! ( Below explained )

As I wrote,again,I am using grid served electricity !

I am  250 Wp-500 Wp 24/365 generator and 3 KWh/day PE consume conventional future-house planner and realizer.


    Frugal-alternative :

12 W body heating consume (per body)and living in an inflateable bulb ,not heated,,wind-/rain saved !

Beside the bulb a 300 US$ (jovoto 300 US$ house)' housemaker'-kitchen,bath-box (8sqm)with daily to 600 Wh decreased warmwater/appliances/light elctric power consume.

25 W kitchen/bath + 12 W each body = ....... answer by appropiate -near life- phantasy,pro or/and contra

100 W generator in this case - 4 capita- sufficient,~ caravavan/RV/home-mobile/trailer

( Irony button on : by Joseph Birmingham its NanoBOXX production costs claim  : 40 US$/KW,1/10 would be seeming affordable,+ producer/inventor 'margin' !? - irony button off )

Many eco-resorts are actually errected by a similar ,glamping ,philosophy !
https://www.glamping.com/

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-m&ei=RYXSZJy1O6yrkdUPqbWloAU&q=glamping&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjc69vQ1M2AAxWsVaQEHalaCVQQ7Al6BAgKEAI&biw=600&bih=784

Ancient ' burning man ' survive event/Nevada ( hexapod-kit) ,today more Barbie+Ken-alias coachella - festival

100 Watt/2,4 KWh per day as global private household standart !

50/20/10 KW GGOE or HES or airpower .......
+ emitter/receiver nearly 90% efficient,improved basic idea  https://overunity.com/19527/edison-dolbear-wireless-grid-early-1900s/msg581029/#new each fixed/mobile household an 125 Watt antenna .
300 €/KW divided 1000 W/125 W =  37,5 €/ household antenna source participation costs .
My view is not dictation,but ever possibilty to think about !

Many families(multi hundred millions) near rivers,coasts,valleeis,forests,islands,earth self frontiers global will loose their homes,new beginning with no/low substancial capital ?
The social system is over-dept !

Climate (cycle) stress : Vanuatu before/after,Puerto Rico,Haiti,Fukushima,Ahrweiler, .....

[rakarskiy]

O boy..................
In regards to picture from above
here is  the link:
https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/dlattach/attach/192466/image//
The energy consumed to lift the weight  is always "the same."
But if we  add to it  friction and weight of pullies than
the more pullies you have the more energy  you need to apply to  lift the weight, even if  it looks like   having 7 pullies  it is x/6  easier to lift it.
No Gain!!! only more losses
Energy consumed to lift the weight  using  series of pullies:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GuldysCVjI
By that  even if I didn't read the patent application  the concept in a  nonsense.
It is easy to look at  that application  history.

2003-05- 29 Application filed by LIN MAO CHANG
2003-05 29 Priority to US10/446,796
2003-05-29 Assigned to PENG, JUNG-CHING, LIN, MAO CHANG
2004-12-02 Publication of US20040239118A1
Status:
Abandoned 2005-06-30- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Comment: "No wonder why"
or in correct  English :
No wonder 80% places for  students in USA major educational  facilities are occupied
by wealthy  Chinese  kids, as their parents  rather prefer  American than Chinese education.

Wesley

A chain hoist is a mechanism used to facilitate lifting a load with the least amount of effort. It consists of movable and fixed blocks connected by flexible links (ropes, chains). The scheme of the polyspast is an element of the mechanism of a crane, elevator, winch and dozens of other machines. Its use eliminates the need to install a powerful drive, allowing a winch with a weak motor to pull a heavy load.

Polyspallet (Greek πολύσπαστον from πολύσπαστος - pulled by many ropes or ropes) is a hoist, a hoisting device consisting of blocks assembled in a movable and fixed cage, successively enveloped by a rope or chain, and designed to win in force (power polyspallet) or in speed (speed polyspallet).


Block and tackle    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block_and_tackle


Wesley, didn't you study such a fascinating device in high school physics? Your teacher didn't tell you why.

Are there, similar devices on gear drives or belt drives? In fact it is a gearbox, the only question is its design.

I don't know the gearbox design of those guys, this is my speculation.

[lancaIV]

rakarskiy,in 1:1 translation ~ ' bottles-train' , ,Flaschenzug,conventional : pulley

https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flaschenzug
Vorrichtung, die den Betrag der aufzubringenden Kraft z. B. zum Bewegen von Lasten verringert

Leistung~ power ,Arbeit~ work ,      Kraft~ force ,   Druck ~ pressure

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=O-NGl0mmOWU

Reibung/friction ,Reibungskoeffizient,Reibungszahl ,today making part : Tribology

Hubkraft/Zugkraft
Mechanics + Electromagnetic Dynamics ( linear,progressive)

Lever,lever arm,equivalent in

https://de.scribd.com/doc/60198978/Patent-Free-Energy-Machine-Lutec-1000#
https://m.facebook.com/SearlEffectGeneratorEther/
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2015031872A1/en