Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[stivep]

You didn't  view  video attached by me before you wrote  your comment.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GuldysCVjI

Wesley, didn't you study such a fascinating device in high school physics?
the gearbox

I was talking about total energy used to lift the load/weight.
Although you may pull the  rope with two fingers to lift the load/weight, the total energy needed to pull it is always greater than  if you were just lift it using one pulley.
The more pulleys you add the more energy in total  you will use.

_{So by multiplying pulleys  you'll pay more  for electricity  used by  motor that is  pulling the load for you
-in that time if you do not apply stopper, you also need to use energy  for hold the rope, - additionally to losses on pulleys weight and friction.}

From  the perspective of a young girl it is cool.
From the perspective of FE there is no gain, only added losses.
of energy needed to lift the weight, as you need to apply the force for  significantly longer time.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnYVz1TSmBQ
Wesley

[rakarskiy]

Wesley, I know the lever system very well, a tenet I've learned since high school:

For the lever F1*L1 = F2*L2 and for the gearbox (F1*V1 = F2*V2) "You win in force you lose in speed, You win in speed you lose in force".

And now watch the video carefully and take screenshots of power at all stages of operation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mq98r-rdayo&t=523s The second video is operation at the most optimal mode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgfZy6KllcE.

The first is the shoulder big wheel flywheel (this inertial product has a golden mean, it is enough to operate it a little bit your on the value of this golden mean ...), the next point is the drive motor, which must have a good speed of rotation, good power. Such a motor is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJiotQBMj5g&t=104s just such a motor I offered them with their scheme of regeneration, as a result we got up to 80% of the return of energy input into the motor control circuit.

To make a small home power plant based on a lever and a flywheel (the flywheel in this design is more of a stabilizer than a multiplier, just the radius of the wheel is a lever), you don't need to trust your physics teacher too much. There is a rough proverb "for every tricky nut-ass, there is a cock-screw" Engineers are not the ones who trust a physics dickhead, but the ones who look for solutions. 

Plus there is still a class of generators that can have electromagnetic torque reduced many times over. It just all requires knowledge, skill, etc.
https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2022/06/magnetic-generator-cop-12.html

[kolbacict]

Let the man sleep, it's night there now.
And in general, Wesley said that perpetual motion machines do not exist, so they do not exist!

[Sergh]

Rakarskiy, I have one simple question for you:

- if you are sure that your motor generates more energy than is consumed, why do you need to make a motor, then somehow convert mechanical energy into electrical energy?
If you are sure that there is free energy in the motor or generator, then make an over-unity transformer instead of the motor. The transformer is much simpler and more reliable in operation.

Occam's razor is the problem-solving principle that recommends searching for explanations constructed with the smallest possible set of elements.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
https://www.google.com/search?q=overunity+transformer

[lancaIV]

Sergh,not motionless transformer,but rotoverter + below :

What did the applicant think,what in his description as process and effect happens/happened :

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19981126&CC=DE&NR=29812556U1&KC=U1#
Each electric car its brake waste energy recuperated x amplified battery charge = unlimited energy cycle ?
Autotransformer/welding transformer dis-/ad-vantage,energetical ?


wmbr
OCWL