Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[listener192]

On that note.. where do we stand with replication attempts?


Would they not be a violation of Holcombs U.S. patent?


L192

[bistander]

Truth is not defamation. Truth is an absolute defense against a defamation claim.
bi

[SolarLab]

On that note.. where do we stand with replication attempts?


Would they not be a violation of Holcombs U.S. patent?


L192

Some of the patent issues were covered early on in the OUR thread...

[ramset]

Truth is not defamation. Truth is an absolute defense against a defamation claim.
bi

Until the lawyer shows up !
And you need to hire your own ...( example already posted above at over-unity research forum !


Best not play that game with another's bank account...
Terms of service agreements are there for just such a reason..and are nonnegotiable !


Of course all members are free to pursue  claims at any venue which allows such endeavors!

[bistander]

Bistander,

So what your saying is:

- take a slip-ring MOTOR, and

- physically LOCK the ROTOR.

You claim this creates a GENERATOR that will OUTPUT up to 5 (five) times the POWER
that is INPUT into the motor.

As an "expert in the field of electric machinery" please explain, in detail, how this happens.

A wiring diagram and a physics explaination would be in order for this one. Also, please
relate this back to Holcomb's claimed techniques if possible.

I do have a bit of scientific and engineering knowledge, but the "logic" and "method"
of simply locking the rotor of a motor turns it into a generator, still escapes me.

The "linear sliding magnetic field" part of Holcomb's Patent was analyzed a while back and
presented in an OUR thread, however, the "rotating magnetic field" analysis has not yet
performed by anyone; to the best of my knowledge.

This is why I ask that you provide some of your expert knowledge from the field of
electric machinery.

Thanks in advance,

SL

"You claim this creates a GENERATOR that will OUTPUT up to 5 (five) times the POWER
that is INPUT into the motor."

Exactly where have you seen me claim that. Reread my posts on the subject. What I've said was ". No doubt been done thousands of times by engineers and technicians. Never heard of anomalous energy appearing. I don't understand how Holcomb does it, so I doubt it happens." See post 1531.

And similarly on previous posts about the stalled induction or synchronous machines, no excess energy appears.

Been my point/question all along: What makes Holcomb's device different? Nothing which I can see.
bi