Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[nix85]

He still does not admit two opposite fluxes clash in the wire (or against its flux), in any case, induction happens in normal manner. Also, as stated x times already, when two magnet fluxes merge flux linking in the wire loop also induces voltage.

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg578802/#msg578802

[rakarskiy]

Corrected.
bi

Addendum for clarification. The essence and meaning of the posts did not change.

[nix85]

I got 3 questions for rakarskiy, he may answer if he wants. If he is for the truth as he should be he will.

1) Do you agree two fluxes clash in the wire (or against its flux)

2) Do you agree once flux lines that clash in the wire (or against its flux) merge, they form a loop that passes through the wire loop

3) Do you agree both of these induce voltage in normal manner

[rakarskiy]

I got 3 questions for rakarskiy, he may answer if he wants. If he is for the truth as he should be he will.

1) Do you agree two fluxes clash in the wire (or against its flux)

2) Do you agree once flux lines that clash in the wire (or against its flux) merge, they form a loop that passes through the wire loop

3) Do you agree both of these induce voltage in normal manner

My view on the nature of the CURRENT (measured in Amperes) in a conductor: https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/p/emf-and-current-in-conductor.html

In the Transformer and the Synchronous Generator, the EMF is induced by a non-contact method, determined by the formula: E = 2πФf /√2 = 44,4Фf
https://studfile.net/preview/2652362/page:19/
(in the window of the transformer core, as well as in the groove of the generator stator, there are no power lines sufficient to induce EMF by contact method)
By the way, physicists cannot explain this and call it an engineering formula (that is, in fact)



At the same time, in the generator, the magnetic induction of the conductor enhances the stator field, and does not oppose it. It was on this effect that I designed my convector and got what I was looking for.

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg578799/#msg578799

***

Your statements: either delusions or outright lies.

[nix85]

My view on the nature of the CURRENT (measured in Amperes) in a conductor: https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/p/emf-and-current-in-conductor.html

In the Transformer and the Synchronous Generator, the EMF is induced by a non-contact method, determined by the formula: E = 2πФf /√2 = 44,4Фf
(in the window of the transformer core, as well as in the groove of the generator stator, there are no power lines sufficient to induce EMF by contact method)
By the way, physicists cannot explain this and call it an engineering formula (that is, in fact)

At the same time, in the generator, the magnetic induction of the conductor enhances the stator field, and does not oppose it. It was on this effect that I designed my convector and got what I was looking for. https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg578799/#msg578799

Your statements: either delusions or outright lies.

I did not ask you to link tons of text in Russian, i did not ask you for a formula for EMF in synchronous generator which i have known for untold years

Synchronous Generator working

I have already shared the key formulas, both are in my thread few general formulas

V=-N*dΦ/dt - farraday's law
V = BLv - farraday law for moving conductor

And

E = 4.44 * number of turns * frequency * flux in the core

And

E/f

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg578723/#msg578723

As i said they are all saying the same thing in slightly different way

Greater the rate of change of flux greater the voltage.

As i as i said before, the fact coil "feels" the change of flux through it to me clearly indicates induction is really mediated through higher order field, namely, the A-field aka Magnetic Vector Potential

A field is the higher order of energy and B field is just the frontal part of it.

You again claim that wire in synchronous generator does not cut flux which is wrong. There is both wire cutting flux and flux linking happening there. That is a fact.

Anyway, all that is important but not needed to explain why Hooper-Monstein experiment is flawed.

You answered none of the 3 questions i asked. I won't ask you again cause i know you won't answer.

You are in denial of facts. It is undeniable that

1) Two fluxes clash in the wire (or against its flux)

2) Once flux lines that clash in the wire (or against its flux) merge, they form a loop that passes through the wire loop

3) Both of these induce voltage in normal manner

YOUR statements are either delusions or outright lies.