Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Just another Don Smith thread

Started by nix85, April 11, 2022, 10:54:51 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Vortex 22

Let's say we can drow electrons.... In order to charge a capacitor?
Input....cap ...water

By applying positive charges from the input on one side of the Cap...we can attract negative charges from the ground in the other side of the Cap ?
But here one problem
In time
Positive charges will develop on the ground and negative charges will develop on the input
How can we solve this?

That's why it's very simple to charge a polar cap by this method
And it's very difficult to charge ac Capacitor

pix

Quote from: nix85 on May 25, 2022, 06:01:36 AM
Notice how pix never replied to me, some people are butthurt when corrected
and every single statement in his 'theory' is diametrically opposite to reality.


I try to minimise unnecessary ambitional disputes.
Once I will put my theory to the test, then I will respond to you.


Cheers,
pix

nix85

Quote from: pix on May 26, 2022, 06:05:54 AM
I try to minimise unnecessary ambitional disputes.
Once I will put my theory to the test, then I will respond to you.


Cheers,
pix

It's not a matter of dispute. Fact is B fields are not canceled and
capacitance lowers Q of RLC tank.

B fields cancel in bucking configuration which this is not.

pix

Quote from: nix85 on May 26, 2022, 06:32:27 AM
It's not a matter of dispute. Fact is B fields are not canceled and
capacitance lowers Q of RLC tank.

B fields cancel in bucking configuration which this is not.
I was refering to Don Smith concept with a bucking coils at secondary. And one coil has capacitor . Tuned to primary frequency.
Anyway, going to test this setup once find a time.
Cheers,
Pix

nix85

Quote from: pix on May 26, 2022, 06:58:14 AM
I was refering to Don Smith concept with a bucking coils at secondary. And one coil has capacitor . Tuned to primary frequency.
Anyway, going to test this setup once find a time.
Cheers,
Pix

You still don't get it, bucking coil is a non-inductive coil, here we got CW and CCW
winding but current in them is also in opposite directions (looking from the center)
two negatives give positive, magnetic fields do not cancel.

Also, it is ridiculous to say one coil has a cap. Cap is in parallel with both coils.
Another way to draw this circuit is with two inductors wound in same direction
in parallel in parallel with a cap, electrically, they are equivalent, only difference
is here one coil is flipped in space relative to the other, but so are the electrical
connections. It makes sense only if you are using diodes to block the bottom coil
from the cap. Again, mag fields do not cancel.