Room for Free Energy and its Physics

[mrwayne]

In this picture - the stroke length of the Production riser and the stroke length of the displacer pod are the same,
and they 50% of the internal head (in height).


The Spread sheet does not block you from incorrect set ups - incorrect set ups will not function in real world builds
- so maintaining those three variable is critical.

[Tarsier_79]

In this picture - the stroke length of the Production riser and the stroke length of the displacer pod are the same, and they 50% of the internal head (in height).

The Spread sheet does not block you from incorrect set ups - incorrect set ups will not function in real world builds - so maintaining those three variable is critical.

Wayne.

Since you are unable to show a diagram with correct distances, I have taken the liberty of assembling a scale drawing for you based on your figures. Can you confirm this is correct?

In a scale of 1:5:
1. We have a power stroke length of 15
2. A reset height of 15
3. A riser(buoyant container) of 30(.2) diameter and 30 height
4. A "POD" or displacer of 30 diameter and 35 height (I have added 4 height for ease of view, will not overly affect overall functionality. Feel free to use 31 or 30 for this calculation.)
5. I have shown the top pistons, but have left out the lower ones for simplicity

In scale:
The Buoyancy reset is 18 x 3.
At the end of the power stroke, we have the buoyant container pushing up with a force of 36. The upper piston has moved 3 units.

[mrwayne]

Be Careful, you might find what dreams are made of...


See the progression, Everything is not explained - such as the connected lower Hydraulics allows the parts weights
to cancel leaving the buoyancy differences to be paid for.


To be clear - the strokes of the input and the output are the same

Air remaining in the other side are not considered (which reduces input cost).


and air compression during sink is not considered (Which also reduces input cost).

What is not the same - the Production work force value is not the same as the Sink work force value..


If this drawing helps anyone - send a YES!


Thank You


Mr Wayne

[mrwayne]

The Science here is simple, too simple. But it is what it is - Free Energy.


Debunking this system is impossible.


Mr Wayne

[Tarsier_79]

For a start: Work is force x distance. Your claim is that you get out more "work" than you put in: Hence OU.

Here is another look at position2. Remember these images are from values from your own spreadsheet, and this is why
it reads 200%.

The input cost 18 x 3 units. Your output calculation is taken from an image like Position 1 or Position 3, and it assumes a
force of 36 x 3.

Look closely at figure 2. Air is about to flow across to the left riser to start the power stroke... or is it? The air in the left
riser is connected to the right riser. The left riser has an effective buoyancy in this position of 36 units... so far so good.

The right riser is at its limit and cannot rise further as it is tied to the "pod". It still has an effective buoyancy of 36 units.
The air will not magically flow from right to left, especially when the right "pod" is trying just as hard to rise as the left
"pod". Remember we need the right pod to lower for the left pod to rise....when the reset stroke is longer, this isn't a
problem because the air naturally flows upwards. Here they are at the same potential.

Figure 2 shows an available force of 0. Figure 2.1 shows an available force of 12, which is the difference in effective
buoyancy. If there was a figure 2.2, it would show 24. Figure 3 shows 36. The average of these is 18 units, x 3 distance
on the power stroke.

So, if we take the average of the power stroke, 18 x 3 and compare it to the input stroke, 18 x 3, we get unity. Like you
said, the work input = work output. There is no left over energy to recycle + generate power.

That seems like your system is debunked to me.