Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Interesting experiment with Meyer's type cell.

Started by Bruce_TPU, May 05, 2007, 01:55:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2
User actions

Bruce_TPU

#5
May 07, 2007, 10:49:17 PM
Thank you pese!

Okay, last night after work I ran two simple experiments.  I wanted to know for sure that my eyes were not playing tricks on me.

Experiment #1

1 water fuel cell with a dc switched voltage supply (1vdc-12vdc).
Sound frequency from laptop set at the highest, 20K hz. to an underwater speaker
volts 2.666
Amps .96
total power 2.5 watts

Gas produced in 1 minute, using a stopwatch
12.5 ml
Faraday efficiency 78%
2.78 w/lph
unity is 2.16 w/lph

Experiment #2
NO sound frequency applied
volts 2.6
Amps 1.04
Power 2.71 watts

Gas produced in 1 minute = 6 ml

To date, using a Meyers type cell, the best efficiency I have ever obtained was 55% efficiency.  (2.16/my watts to produce liter per hour = efficiency percentage)

Conclusion of first set of experiments:
Sound Frequency DOUBLED production.

My next set of experiments will be with much higher current.

Thank you for your time,
Bruce
1.  Lindsay's Stack TPU Posted Picture.  All Wound CCW  Collectors three turns and HORIZONTAL, not vertical.

2.  3 Tube amps, sending three frequency's, each having two signals, one in-phase & one inverted 180 deg, opposing signals in each collector (via control wires). 

3.  Collector is Magnetic Loop Antenna, made of lamp chord wire, wound flat.  Inside loop is antenna, outside loop is for output.  First collector is tuned via tuned tank, to the fundamental.  Second collector is tuned tank to the second harmonic (component).  Third collector is tuned tank to the third harmonic (component)  Frequency is determined by taking the circumference frequency, reducing the size by .88 inches.  Divide this frequency by 1000, and you have your second harmonic.  Divide this by 2 and you have your fundamental.  Multiply that by 3 and you have your third harmonic component.  Tune the collectors to each of these.  Input the fundamental and two modulation frequencies, made to create replicas of the fundamental, second harmonic and the third.

4.  The three frequency's circulating in the collectors, both in phase and inverted, begin to create hundreds of thousands of created frequency's, via intermodulation, that subtract to the fundamental and its harmonics.  This is called "Catalyst".

5.  The three AC PURE sine signals, travel through the amplification stage, Nonlinear, producing the second harmonic and third.  (distortion)

6.  These signals then travel the control coils, are rectified by a full wave bridge, and then sent into the output outer loop as all positive pulsed DC.  This then becomes the output and "collects" the current.

P.S.  The Kicks are harmonic distortion with passive intermodulation.  Can't see it without a spectrum analyzer, normally unless trained to see it on a scope.

Paul-R

#6
May 08, 2007, 04:48:18 PM
Quote from: pese on May 06, 2007, 10:53:33 AM
Quote from: Paul-R on May 06, 2007, 09:49:37 AM
John Worrell Keely reckoned on 42.8 Mhz as a crucial
frequency. Miles out of the range of a sound card,
obviously. But there will be an octave lower down that
will be worth trying, to be found by halving the frequency
repeatedly:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:John_Keely

Are you sure that you are not simply shaking the bubbles
off the plates?
Paul.
Give attention on the frequency !!
Peswiki say:
Exploding water with 42712.2Hz
This are : 42,72122 Khz   !!!
You can (double? or) triple the frequnzy from soundcard
PESE
If you halve the frequency 14 times, i.e. go down 14 octaves,
you are at C on the piano or on the first fret on the fifth string
of a guitar. Keely might have suggested 261 herz as a place to
start using a sound card.
http://www.phy.mtu.edu/~suits/notefreqs.html
Paul.

TheOne

#7
May 08, 2007, 05:29:57 PM
a good sound card can be able to do 48 and 96kHz but the onboard from computer are usually able to do up to 44.1khz
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2
User actions