RE: For starters , Read this first, compiled PDF file of Steven Mark postings

[Victor]

stevenmarktpu.pdf (integrate)

[Motorcoach1]

deleted

[Sauron]

"My friend who is a science professor at a university here where I live told me something which made me react in a positive way.
He said that during his class he challenges his science and engineering students to attempt to explain how my technology could be faked and if some student does explain satisfactorily then they will be rewarded by not being required to take the next examination.
He told me to reflect on the fact that out of a thousand bright college students absolutely no one has even offered a serious guess as to how what they see in the demonstration tapes could be faked.
He went on to say that it is all fine and well for people to shout fake and fraud, but the burden of proof is on them... and they all have failed, haven't they.
My friend, everything you have seen on the videos is the absolute truth so help me God."

[mkt3920]

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,712.msg4150.html#msg4150

its only the tpu that i do not have faith in.  as i said in another post somewhere even the videos looked rigged to me.  i apologize but no matter what i look into about this guy i keep finding zeros.  As far as the other experiments on this site they rock!  Like i said i do not want to discourage anyone from playing with the tpu, however based on my knowledge i found several errors that he made in his written presentation.  i prefer correct data and facts to hyperbole.

so i wll reserve my judgement for now.

Guess it is time to bring this up again for the newer guys.  Take a look at Patent 6015476 and look for similarities.  Read the wording carefully and see if there might be some relationships?  Words like "magnetic enhancement", "rotating magnetic field", "four coils, each having numerous turns, formed in loops having the rough shape of a bay windowframe" (see pic and shape of coils), etc....

And the patent was filed in 1998 (around same time as videos) and a guy named Steve Marks is one of the listed inventors.  No, I do not think this is exactly a TPU, but maybe it is similar or maybe just a coincidence ?
Kent

[z_p_e]

It's coincidence. "Steve Marks" is not our man.

In addition, according to what SM has said, the patents are for the control circuits only, NOT the coil arrangements.

It's time people stopped reaching to see something that isn't really there, and this includes equating Steorn's and Gunderson's patents to the TPU as well.

Darren