Successful TPU-ECD replication !

[BEP]

@ronotte

Yes. It is a thing of beauty. Your scope shots also excite me...

1. I see the 'three sisters' effect at each CC set. i.e. three pulses in each group  2 lagging 90 from the previous pulse. I'm used to seeing only three groups. The first and last pulse in each group tend to work together to kick the middle one very high.
2. I think what you are calling 'seed' I am familiar with as inductive ringback from the aluminum core. All signals on the aluminum core would be seen as mirror images of the non-aluminum core but weaker, leading and clearly sinus but damped.

When the two are tuned  and working together it should be very exciting. Can't wait to hear of your results.


@EMdevices

On the Lorentz violations... Yes. Unfortunately I believe I do understand how it works. I don't consider that a blessing. I do feel this function is the key to arriving at the point where we light more than a bulb and self-run.
The two most important factors are there must be a vertical (axis in plane Y) solenoid like field that is either not rotating, going the opposite direction (rotation around Y on the plane of Z) or at a different rate than the other - and - the field above it has the axis 90 out from the first or horizontal (axis along X) while rotating centered at the Y axis (rotating on planes X and Z with Y as the equator).

Many things happen then but mainly the normally chaotic particle formations begin to have the chaos cancelled out allowing the particles to flow across the field lines of the vertical field in more useful trajectories. This, of course, creates electricity.

This is the way many have done it and many have claimed to have done it. Ronotte's screen shots do look familiar.

[Gustav22]

Hello Roberto,

Are you placing the 3 CCs in an equal distance of 120? along the big collector circle (i.e. 120? on the 6" circle)?

If this does not lead to the expected success, I suggest, that you place the 3 CCs in a distance of 120? along the TOTAL COLLECTOR LENGTH.

(circumference of big + small circle divided by 3)

In other words, I suggest:
Mark the 3 thirds of the TOTAL COLLECTOR LENGTH BEFORE you fold the M?bius loop. And then place the 3  CCs on those points.

So 2 CCs would be on the big circle and 1 CC on the small circle.

[ronotte]

Hi Gustav22,

.....so many thinghs to do! (yes, I always used to set the CCs only in the bigger loop). You are certainly right: that 's a test that someone has to do!

In my case due to the annular disk presence it's not so easy but for sure all our efforts are now pointing in obtaining power so considering that the only (seems) thing to deal with is the CC...well I'm actually working on it.  In my opinion your wire lenght calculus is also correct so at least for me I'll try it.

Roberto

[Rosphere]

In other words, I suggest:
Mark the 3 thirds of the TOTAL COLLECTOR LENGTH BEFORE you fold the M?bius loop. And then place the 3  CCs on those points.

So 2 CCs would be on the big circle and 1 CC on the small circle.

I will try this configuration when I complete my coils.

I have some, "high power stereo speaker cable," made by Sparkomatic:  SWK116 is, "super heave gauge, dual lead braided copper wire."  Nowhere on the package is the gauge size mentioned.  (116 must refer to the one sixteen foot length per package; it is much bigger than 16 AWG.)  Using my fancy wire strippers, I find that all of the copper strands, on one side, fit snugly in the 12 AWG slot and I can pull the wires out without cutting any strands.  The fit in the 10 AWG slot seems too sloppy.  So, to make a long story short, I think it is 12 AWG.

If I connect the 6" outer-loop and 4" inner-loop with about 2.3" lengths of wire per side then I will have almost exactly three feet total length for each of the dual leads.  Placing my CC's as above would mean one foot spacings along the total three foot length; two on the outside loop and one on the inside.

Six feet total length of 12 AWG comes out to about 6,053 mm^3 copper volume.  Matching copper volume, (mass,) of the total Mobius coil with a 22 AWG primary coil means cutting about 61 feet of wire for the primary.  Matching copper volume of the Mobius coil and a primary coil with a 24 AWG secondary coil means cutting about 97 feet of wire for the secondary.  (Why 22 and 24 AWG?  I have enough of both right now to make the three CC sets.  I would like to use 20 AWG for the primary.  But I do not have enough right now.)

I am making "elongated" spools from round spools right now to accommodate my special 3/4" wide x 1/8" thick speaker cable.  I basically cut three 1.25" white 'Radio Shack' spools in half and I am gluing in four 3/4", (plus a hair,) spacers per spool.  The copper windings will add rigidity and prevent the spools from separating; the spacers just prevent the spools from collapsing inward during assembly and handling.  I epoxied two small squares of shag carpet to a long screw which I hope to use with a variable speed drill to help wind my elongated CC's.  We shall see how this works.

I made a nifty little square wave generator from a 74HC14 chip I had laying around.  My circuit sends three synchronized square waves to the three MOSFET drivers, (thanks again, Jason.)  The second wave starts when the first one ends, the third one starts when the second one ends, the first one starts again when the third one ends.  I use only one 3M trim-pot to change the frequency of all three signals simultaneously.

What I would like to do is set the pulse on-time equal to one-quarter of the primary coil resonant frequency, using a diode at the ground side of the coil.  Then flip a second diode around at that same node and connect it to the ground point of the next coil; using six diodes all around the total path.  In this way I hope to use the relaxing coil to help the circuit drive the next coil in line.  I wonder what will happen.

Then I would like to adjust my pulse on-time from one quarter of the coils wavelength slowly down to only one sixth of the wavelength.  I wonder what will happen.

[Rosphere]

What I would like to do is set the pulse on-time equal to one-quarter of the primary coil resonant frequency, using a diode at the ground side of the coil.  Then flip a second diode around at that same node and connect it to the ground point of the next coil; using six diodes all around the total path.  In this way I hope to use the relaxing coil to help the circuit drive the next coil in line.

This part reminds me of the cannonball analogy that SM was using.  In this case the electrons will come from ground through a diode and into the "on" CC until saturation when the circuit switches it off and switches on the next CC.  The electrons in the first coil, now switched off, go out through another diode connected to the ground point of the next coil, now switched on.  The original electrons never make it to the positive terminal, they keep getting shot into the next coil, like the cannon balls.

I think a frequency 2X the primary CC resonant frequency might do the trick.  With three, naturally synchronized, 33.3% duty cycle pulses, the second time around the ring will interrupt the first coil from going negative because it will be at the halfway point of it's full resonant cycle.

Blah, blah, blah... I should get back to the lab.