The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

[gn0stik]

So now he has it running on caps?

Well, I have my plate in front of me. All of my words are piled on it.

If someone can replicate these results and explain it, I'll eat every last one.

Anxiously waiting.

The "taking a break for two weeks" thing is familiar, though. The diagram, shouldn't be that hard to scribble out in notepad. How frustrating.

Earl, in your diagram, should power be input via the primary and output via the secondary, to the next device's primary? (which may or may not be inverted)

Basically what you have done is a couple conductors with chokes in them..

brnbrade, please post a cct before you leave for your break. if you have no ammeter, that's fine someone else can replicate and test if you post your cct.

[jacob]

Unless I missed something, it is rather difficult to do this without a drawing or schematic of what you have connected there. Why not post a drawing instead of a photo?

May I suggest for your own sake, and for the sake of others here trying to replicate and help you develop this (you did ask for people to replicate), that you STOP what you're doing at this point and draw out what you have done. Call this v1.0 if you like, but at least have one documented starting point.

It would take you no more than 5 minutes to scratch this out on a piece of paper, take a photo of it, and post it here.

OR, you can keep the frenzie going here by holding back as you mentioned. The choice is yours.

By the way, are you using any transistors or MOSFET's in this device?

Darren

Darren,

I agree with you that brnbade hasn't published much details about his setup. But fortunately, we have pictures and the original patent. Together, they tell the whole story. So if you read through the patent, carefully examine the pictures and factor in the additional information that was provided (i.e.: use of alufoil), you'll be able to reproduce this setup very easily.

I, just like you, like to fully analyse any idea that comes up to make sure that it is a sound concept. But where there is smoke, there is also fire. There is something real happening here. Sure, we can find faults in the way this is being done. But there will always be. Let's rather try to find and isolate what works. If we want to move forward, we must all push in the same direction. Uniting our efforts will benefit all of us.

Regards,

Jacob

[jacob]

It would not be too difficult to power a 12V, 50W bulb for a few minutes from 2 AA batteries with the right circuit. Keep that in mind folks.

Darren

Darren,

I need your help here. I have no idea how this would be possible. Because it would imply pulling upward of 10-15 amps from those small batteries and maintaining that draw for a few minutes. Plus, let's keep in mind that there is no high speed switching component being used here. Can you please explain how it can be done. Thanks!

Jacob

[jacob]

What Brnbrade is showing here is very very important indeed.

Four variations have been shown thus far.

1) Coils + 3v Battery, DC-DC 58 vdc out.
2) Coils + 3v Battery + Sound (two channel positive only) DC-AC 250V out.
3) Coils + Cap (330 uf 200v) + Cap (62 pf or uf(hard to see) 400v about 4-7v ac out
4) Coils + 4 Caps (hard to see values) about 20v ac out

Wattsup,

If you go back at the beginning of this thread, you'll see that the output with the 3v battery pack is 52 V AC. In fact, the output will never be DC or at least pure DC under any circumstances unless of course it is rectified and/or filtered.

Thanks for the multimeter picture. I was (unactively) looking for it.

Jacob

[BEP]

BEP,
You have to think differently about this. There is no need to inject signals into this device.

Agreed. As BrnBrade has shown us there are different modes. Passing a magnet one way or the other is a kick. One direction may yeild + while the other -. Hitting it with sine should create sine. And the DC should be like DC from a bridge rectifier, like in the Tesla magnetic rectifier.
For the aluminum usage I refer to 'radioactive batteries'. Radioactive batteries should have been called 'radiant energy batteries'. Also aluminum is interesting enough in magnetic fields because of the Lorentz forces involved.
All just speculation, of course. That is all I do, right?