The Brnbrade Coil/Overunity?

[dani1]

Daniel McFarland Cook - It was already posted

http://www.google.com/custom?domains=www.overunity.com&q=Daniel+McFarland+Cook&sa=Search&sitesearch=&client=pub-2734280293205008&forid=1&channel=6216229028&ie=ISO-8859-1&oe=ISO-8859-1&safe=active&flav=0000&sig=9MMmaVuXZs6964HO&cof=GALT%3A%23008000%3BGL%3A1%3BDIV%3A%23336699%3BVLC%3A663399%3BAH%3Acenter%3BBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BLBGC%3A336699%3BALC%3A0000FF%3BLC%3A0000FF%3BT%3A000000%3BGFNT%3A0000FF%3BGIMP%3A0000FF%3BFORID%3A1&hl=en

[wattsup]

@all

Decided to read McFarlands patent again before I build. I just realized that he is using the term "Secondary" to designated what we call the Primary and the term "Primary" to designated what we call the Secondary.

Geez, that would explain why Brnbrade was referring to the thicker red wire as the Secondary and by consequence, we were getting confused.

Or, am I dreaming or what? Very interesting indeed.

Anyways, read the patent. Short read. There are many ways to make this.

@btentzer

I don't see what the commotion is all about since this thread is off the SM topic, it will only create less noise.

[tao]

The talk goes around the Farland Cook patents has been deliberatly changed.....
I do not know the reference source of where i heard it, but i am sure it was about these particulair coils.

i also experimented with these and i never got it to work.
Marco.

Anyone ever notice that McFarland speaks of a 'circuit D' in the diagrams, but there ISN'T anything labeled 'D' in his patent.

Perhaps that is where the idea that the patent was modified came from?

[wattsup]

@mramos

First off, I was going to  use two nails as the cores. But I decided to use bailing wire instead, I cut them 12 inches each and using 16 wires per core. McFarland patent indicates this is also suitable. In fact the patent states that almost anything goes and McFarland was talking about using very large cores upto 12 feet long. But let's start small.

I will be using aluminium foil. I am just wondering about the insulator. I will use regular electrical tape but I hope the foil does not get ripped up too much.

I will also try to make a circular unit with center bailing wire core.

@tao

Hey, I read that also but after reading so many Tesla patents, etc., what I think he is referring to is that in order to initiate the build up the power, you can use a reostat to reduce current going to load which he refers to as D. This does not have to be on the patent since any kind of load and  load control could be D. He refers to the whole of the device, reostat and load as the "circuit" whereas we would refer to the circuit as being the electronic part of device.

[z_p_e]

Hi tao,

Jacob already mentioned that a couple pages back.

However, I wouldn't go jumping to conclusions that this omission was done deliberately. I've seen many patents that have these types of errors in them.

It's easy enough to have planned to include a part in a patent, only later to decide it will not be there, but they forget to edit the text, especially since it cost money to do so any time you want to make a change. Or they just forgot to edit the text.

Anyhow, I'm just suggesting that there are other possible reasons for the decrepancy, and we shouldn't always assume it was for suppression reasons.

Darren