TPU: End Game...

[ltseung888]

@tao,

I hope you do not mind my including some of your excellent diagrams in my latest write up:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2621.msg40277.html#msg40277

Keep up the good work.

Regards,

Lawrence Tseung

[tao]

@tao,

I hope you do not mind my including some of your excellent diagrams in my latest write up:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2621.msg40277.html#msg40277

Keep up the good work.

Regards,

Lawrence Tseung

Lawrence,

Whatever helps us all have overunity systems in our hands, I am all for it.

Your writeup is looking better everyday. It is no problem that you used the images.

[Grumpy]

Many here keep incessantly chanting "build, build, build!"

The question is "build what  "

I'm really tiring of that.

Until Steven Mark or UEC discloses some plans or a diagram of the coils and their interconnection, OR if and when someone develops something along the lines of the TPU, and can PROVE that it is overunity, OR someone puts forth a theory that to me seems to fit all the clues, I will continue the path I feel comfortable with.

So I would appreciate it if the constant "encouragement" to build would cease, and some respect afforded to those who may still be thinking about what, when, if, and how they will build and test. I am quite able to determine on my own when and how I am ready to build....alright?

Many thanks,
Darren

What is REALLY funny Darren, is that you, me, and some others are getting HARASSED for not building yet, but the new guy to the forum Mark Snoswell(good approach man, love the conceptual model so far), they aren't yelling at him to BUILD, which is funny.

Just look at Mark's well put statement:

"This highlights a lesson I learned after being seduced into replication attempts of several types of devices (not TPU's). Seeking to blindly copy someone else?s design is a bit like gold rush fever. You don?t know what you are doing; you don?t have enough information to go on; it's often doomed to failure as it's based on misinformation. It's little better than gambling.

The lesson it to strive for understanding so that you can intelligently design your own devices and add to the collective pool of information."


SO, 'they' let that slide, but we and others get harassed, go figure...

@Tao

Mark is verifiying his theories through experimentation.  Bob Boyce experimented and look at him now.  SM used "lamp cord" to experiment with.

How many of the experiments and ideas put forth have you tested or even obtained the materials to test at a later time?  MY guess is "none".  You wander around - lost in the the maze of the "thought puzzle", and never push the walls to see if they open to the outside.

I, too, was in this "maze".  I pushed open a wall and now I am free.  It's like coming out of the "Matrix".   Instead of endlessly searching Google and reading posts on this forum - build what you need to test your ideas.

You can not gain the understanding that SM spoke of without getting your hands dirty.

Just build it - you can figure it out later.

-----------------------------

@Z_P_E

I was talking to Tao.  So kind of you to insert yourself into our conversation.   Stay in the Matrix - it's better for you.

------------------------------

@Tao and Z_P_E

There is nothing to fear but fear itself.  Stop making excuses.  Make your thoughts and theories manifest.  OR - stay in the maze.  I'm done trying to help you.

------------------------------

@Super God

About the 1 ns switch - time for electrons and such to flip is related to the resistance of the conductor.  IRF730 switches in low ns range - increase resistance of conductor to slow the rate of change which slows the flip.  (Don't know why I even bother,  1 in a million will even try this.)  Capacitors can also dump very quickly...hmm string of discharging capacitors might be interesting..

I suspect that this rate of change in potential can be slowed magnetically - similar to Tesla's magnetically quenched gap - have to try this out.

[z_p_e]

Grumpy wrote:

Build now - ZPE - build now!  RMF for less tha $5 with that 4017 chip

@Z_P_E

I was talking to Tao.  So kind of you to insert yourself into our conversation.   Stay in the Matrix - it's better for you.

Grumpy, my post was in response to the first quote above which was from you a couple pages back.

I've tried my best to explain to you my approach and my point of view. I've considered your point of view, but must confess I don't fully understand it. Oh well, evidently, you don't understand mine either.

Guess from your point of view, I'll be in the "matrix", and you'll be in some other "enlightened" place.

Good for you! Happy trails.

Cheers,
Darren

[giantkiller]

I don't know where I've gone today...

--giantkiller.