The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Koen1]

Since I cannot tell the background of the Forum Participants, I shall stop repeating myself to educate them. 

Hahahaha yeah right... that makes about as much sense as two turds in a hammock
We have been asking you over and over again to stop repeating your claims without giving any proper proof nor logal deduction, and start explaining in a logical, step by step manner exactly how you see your "experiments" as examples of the principles and effects you claim in your so-called "theory".
You keep refusing to do so and ignoring our questions, and instead you keep posting nonsense discussions between phantasy personas and reports of your alleged attendance at dubious conferences.
And now you once again attempt to play your old trick: accusing the forum members here of ignorance and stupidity, while it is clearly you who demonstrates his ignorance and inability to reason logically. Are you really demented?

If people cannot understand 1112, 1121 and 1165, so be it.  You have to find help elsewhere.

Listen buster, it's your "theory" and your claims that you can explain how OU devices must work, so it's also up to you to take responsibility for those claims of yours and explain it to people in a satisfactory manner. Throwing the towel in the ring just because we don't fall for your continued evasive manoevres is weak. You are making yourself lose face. Not that we care, since you've already made yourself the laughing stock of the forum, but you might care as losing face is usually considered a horrible disgrace for asian people...  

I can only communicate with top physicists - the Russian Archimedes group, the Chinese Universities, the Hong Kong Inventor Association, the USA DoD etc.

Lol are you now seriously rating the Hong Kong inventors association as the same level as the U.S. DoD? Hahahaha!
Besides, you can't comunicate clearly period. Let's see these Russians or even the DoD try to take you seriously when you start posting your "Student A/B/C", "Mingmei" and "Alien A/B/C" discussions, and when you don't answer any of their questions but rather present them with silly "experiments" like pushing upturned chairs and swinging bottles... Again, of course nobody here actually believes a word of your story that the U.S. DoD is in contact with you, what with all the dumb accusations you made a month or so ago, accusing almost all of us of being CIA agents... Oh, sorry "CIA and the Likes" agents. 

One surprising entity is the devil.  He seems to know more physics than everyone.  You can watch the show.

Lol yeah well... that may just be because Devil is just another of your alter egos.... We're not falling for that one. The style of writing is too similar.

The U.S. version of an advanced energy event is in the works, with live demos scheduled on June 28-29 in Charlotte Hall, MD.   I shall work on the Chinese Version.   It may be better for you to see the demos first.

It may be better for you to stop going to all these conventions, festivals, fotoshoots and brothels, and to start giving clear and convincing explanations and proofs of your "theory" and its claimed "supporting experiments".
Oh, right, I keep forgetting, you pretend to be blind to posts such as this... 

Sorry that I am of no help to you.  I am not a good physics teacher.

You are no help to anyone at all.
And you are not just a bad physics teacher, you are also plain bad at physics!
And at logic, and at explaining things in a comprehensive and clear fashion. And probably at quite a number of other things too...
(like your inability to handle a simple drill, your inability to grasp clear descriptions, etcetera)

[ltseung888]

Tseung, you can get more information about the Richard Clem Motor in

http://keelynet.com/energy/clem3.htm

The theory behind it is elementary.

(1)   The Axle is horizontal.  The cone shaped structure will extract gravitational energy on rotation.  The Liang IC Pulsed Cylinder is also horizontal.  The power is 188 horsepower with a weight of 28 kg.  The Clem engine was 350 horsepower with a weight of 90 kg.  The Liang engine is superior to the Clem engine in this respect.

(2)   The rest of the Clem engine is just a closed system.  It requires a starting engine to achieve the required operational speed.  (The Liang engine also requires that.)

(a)   A company called Creative Sciences (http://www.fuellesspower.com) is selling plans ($60) for what they claim is a machine that generates 1500hp and runs by itself. They call this a CEACU and claim it was released by a 70 year old retired scientist.

(b)   With regard to differences between the CEACU design and Clem the CEACU does not require the cone, but instead uses a thick disk with nozzles on the outer edge. A hollow shaft feeds water into this disk at a high velocity.  As the water exits from the nozzles, the disk spins giving an ever higher velocity. A 3200 psi air tank is used to get the disk spinning to 1000 rpm when it is claimed to begin to run on its own. There are other ways to achieve this velocity beyond 3200 psi as you can well imagine.

The KeelyNet and Creative Sciences people totally missed the boat.  They were looking for the magic in the workings of the engine.  The actual source of energy is from the rotation of the cone or disk leading out gravitational energy.  Any stupid closed loop system can do the trick.

Many Cosmic Energy Machine inventors spent years working on their invention without truly understanding the theory.  In particular, they could not identify the source of their energy.

The Richard Clem Motor and the CEACU Motor from Creative Sciences are two good examples.  The inventors must have focused on the assembling of the machines; figuring out ways to tune and improve them.

The true source of energy is totally outside their machines.  It is the pulsed rotation (Lee-Tseung Pull) of the horizontal cone, disk or cylinder Leading Out gravitational energy.  Any simple closed system could suffice. 

My posts will benefit these dedicated Inventors.

Lawrence Tseung
It could be heart-breaking for some Inventors to realize that they were on the wrong path for years.

[Devil]

Tseung, in your heart, it is the Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory.

In the real World, it will be the Area 51 theory or some other name.

You will not get any fame or fortune.

[Bessler007]

ltseung888,

This could help if you endeavor to teach physics.  Learn the language specifically the difference between mechanical or kinetic energy and forces like gravity.  Try to comprehend where there is no motion (eg still air) there is no mechanical energy.

If learning the language of physics isn't your cup of tea perhaps you could develop your unique language and become the founder of an entirely different branch of physics.  I'd suggest you make up your own terms as using those of contemporary physics is only going to cause confusion.  You will be misunderstood and thought of as a crank. 

Best wishes.

Maybe a final thought.  It's irrelevant who the person is if the discussion is about an idea.  I do recognize when it's necessary to engage in personal attacks it's important to know who you're talking to.  If the discussion is centered around an idea, the person is way beyond the point.


Bessler007
mib, HQ

[shruggedatlas]

The Tseungs now heavily outnumber us.  I suggest we all surrender and drink the Lead Out punch.