The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[chrisC]

Dear chrisC,

This is one of your few constructive posts.  It raised the whole issue of patents, patent applications, International patents, patent examinations, patent protection, patent fee and Individual Country Patents.

I shall defer such discussions until we have settled on Slides 10-12.  No distraction for now.

Will you ever comment intelligently on Slides 10-12?

No, Lawrence. I'm not here to play your 'circular' arguments game. In software terms, it is called a 'Loop'.
You're so full of yourself and still don't know you're looping!

Now, the rest of the forum members know we're not being 'mean' to you! You know the patent office (whatever country you care to file) will simply throw your stuff down the toilet. End of discussion.

Does any of this mean anything to you? Maybe you really should find some time to play with your grandchildren instead of wasting your time and trying to convince the world of your mumbo-jumbo physics.

There is still time to register at the local community college you know...

I'm really out of this thread. Best wishes to you and I do mean it.

cheers
chrisC

[ltseung888]

No Tseung, it didn't "raise the issue of patents" and you really can't distract us from
what Chris pointed out.

Let me quote for you what the patent authority said about your patent application:

Claims 1-6 that claiming of extracting of work from gravitation in addition to energy used to overcome
the gravitational forces are in violation with the energy conservation laws and as such they don't have an
industrial applicablilty.

Applicant based his invention on scientific principle or theory developed by him that is not recognised by currently
accepted scientific theories. Applicant is vague with respect to where the "energy pulse" comes from, and he also
anticipates the potential or gravity energy accumulated by the "energy pulse" to be larger than the initial "energy
pulse" initially supplied to the system. The assumption of such surplus energy from gravity is in violation of
energy conservation principle that disallows the perpetual motion machine of the first type i.e. the machine that is
capable to create more useful energy than it takes to generate it.

In other words, you were just as incapable of convincing the patent authority as you were of convincing us. 

Why don't you read our response?

http://www.wipo.int/ipdl/IPDL-IMAGES/PATENTSCOPE/74/32/bd/0032bd.pdf

If you want the World to get the full picture, show the whole thing.  I shall defer discussion on patents until Slides 10-12 issues are settled.  Otherwise, we shall go back to the same slides a few hundred posts later.

[Cap-Z-ro]

*conducts search of Lawrence's bait box for barbed hooks*

[Devil]

I'm really out of this thread. Best wishes to you and I do mean it.

cheers
chrisC

@chrisC, the same words have been said before.  You have lied and will lie again.

@Tseung, you now know that your noble and idealistic goal of benefiting the World is Impossible.  There are too many with vested interests including President Bush who invaded Iraq.  He is still claiming the death of over 4,000 US soldiers and many thousand Iraqi civilians are justified.  He cannot possibly accept that you already have the solution to the Energy Crisis.  He will be seen as a total fool.

His paid or unpaid supporters will continue to try to destroy you.  You are against the most powerful person on Earth. 

Good Luck with your explanation of Slide 10-12.  They are correct but the noise will drown them.

[Forever]

I have been reading the last few posts related to slides 10 ? 12. I learned these slides the first day I met Mr. Tseung. He insisted that I had to understand them thoroughly. He made me do the mathematics.

Those slides and the calculations really help my understanding. Some of my friends could not pass the mathematics test and they dropped out from helping Mr. Tseung.

I was at the Shenzhen Seminar. There were over seventy people. There were many professors. It really opened my eyes! It was quite an experience for me. They all seem to follow the material easily. After the formal seminar, fifteen people stayed behind for a three-hour lunch meeting. I was one of them.