The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Koen1]

There is no reason to expect any "glory", Tseung.
You and your friends suck at theory.
You already make others shine by showing your incompetence.

We don't care who represents what country as a selfprocalimed energy expert at yet
another conference of yours.
If you again do not show any proof there, then just like all other conferences you claim
to have visited there will be zero reaction to your "theory", and you will not be able to
show any form of proof just as usual, and that will be that.
Afterward you will try to shout glory and victory and claim your "theory" was eagerly
accepted by the so-called experts, but when push comes to shove there's still zero
proof and zero functional device for your "theory". And you will claim there is.
And so you just keep repeating your old tricks.
But we're not falling for them any longer.
You can keep shouting that pigs can fly and you can even believe it,
but that doesn't make it true. Just test it, and you'll see.

If it's really true that your mission in live was completed the moment you coined in other words
came up with the name "Lee-Tseung Pull", then why did you keep producing such huge
amounts of unfounded claims?
No, your mission is clearly to convince us of the validity of your theory. Yet you refuse to do the
one thing that could convince us: provide proof, empirical proof.

You are a liar and a con man, Tseung.
And instead of whining about insults, try to show me wrong then eh? That's right, you can't.

[shruggedatlas]

Wand Shum Ho is now representing China as a top energy expert.  I expect Joseph Newman, Bedini etc. will represent USA as top energy experts.

Do you even know anything about Joseph Newman?  Do you even know whether his machine works?  Do you just repeat things you see on some Internet website?  Comparing Wang Shum Ho to him is no compliment to Mr. Wang.

[chrisC]

Thank you for all your comments including the insults.

An improved presentation will be ready.  I intend to send the English version to USA for the June AERO event.

Ms. Forever Yuen will do the final touch - adding some quotes from the Physics textbooks used in Hong Kong.

Every statement in this new presentation can be double checked with the information from the Physics textbooks.  Physics and Mathematics cannot lie and the Lee-Tseung theory cannot be wrong.

Old Tseung:

It's never a issue with real Math. and real Physics that lies. It's the guy who comes up with indequate understanding of Physics and translate them to unbalanced mathematics who is the liar.

However many times you've checked and rechecked does not matter if they are wrong to start with. You don't seemed to understand simple truths. Also, you can rewrite in Chinese or English or Swahili, it matters not a hoot! It's still wrong. Wrong has never been Right!

Unfortunately for you, your more stubborn than a mule and cannot accept that you can possibly be wrong. That's why 'insults' follow you whichever forum you care to pollute your Lee-Tseung pull (or is it push?) crap onto. Now, that's the truth!

You just look SILLY!

cheers
chrisC

[Pirate88179]

Lawrence:

Why don't you re-post the video of Forever's magnetic pendulum experiments?  That might be a good start.  As far as I can recall, that was the only real attempt at showing something possibly positive about your theory.  If I recall, the pendulum had more cycles with the magnetic repulsion than with the magnetic attraction or no magnets...is this correct?  If you post it again, and explain how the results fit your theory, this might be a good start.  Or, better yet, have her make and post another video of a similar experiment along with a good explanation of how it fits your theory.  Just an idea.

Bill

[ltseung888]

Lawrence:

Why don't you re-post the video of Forever's magnetic pendulum experiments?  That might be a good start.  As far as I can recall, that was the only real attempt at showing something possibly positive about your theory.  If I recall, the pendulum had more cycles with the magnetic repulsion than with the magnetic attraction or no magnets...is this correct?  If you post it again, and explain how the results fit your theory, this might be a good start.  Or, better yet, have her make and post another video of a similar experiment along with a good explanation of how it fits your theory.  Just an idea.

Bill

Good idea.  I shall ask her to do the experiment on Parallelogram of Forces for the benefit of those who forgot their O level physics.  It is very easy to do. See attached diagram pendulum25.jpg.

The experiment is done with three spring scales lying horizontally on a board.  Large thumb nails can be pressed into the board.  The experiment is performed as follows:

(1) Place the three scales as shown.  One end of each scale is tied to a string with a knot in the middle.
(2) One of the scales is pinned with a large thumb nail through its ring.
(3) The other two scales were pulled so that all three scales showed readings of forces.
(4) The two scales were also pinned down so as to produce the above diagram.
(5) A piece of paper was placed underneath the knot.  The lines showing the angles were traced.
(6) The reading on the three scales were taken.  Their relationship with the lines of force were noted.
(7) The experimental readings were then compared with the theoretical results as predicted by the Parallelogram of Forces.

This experiment or its variations have been done millions of times over the Centuries Worldwide.  It cannot be wrong.