Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

Started by ltseung888, July 20, 2007, 02:43:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 103 Guests are viewing this topic.

Pirate88179

@ TopGun:

You should really change your name to TopDork.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

Bessler007

Topic: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory  (Read 93793 times)

I don't believe my eyes.

Einstein once said, "Any man who can drive safely while kissing a pretty girl is simply not giving the kiss the attention it deserves."  Wait, that's not the point I'm going for.

Maybe I need to make up a quote.  Here goes. "any theory without a practical result is worthless."  Has anyone said that before me?  I'm sure someone has at least thought it.


ought seven
:)
http://www.bessler007.blogspot.com
Please try again. If you come back to this error screen, report the error to an administrator.

chrisC

Quote from: Pirate88179 on August 25, 2008, 10:47:45 PM
@ TopGun:

You should really change your name to TopDork.

Bill

Hahaha! Couldn't agree more Bill!
Now, TopDork is exploring magnetism and electricity and trying to teach electromagnets? huh? I guess magnets stick and no drills are needed! Ah! So! Now I get it!

cheers
chrisC

Top Gun

Why do we need the collector coils?

   If there were only pulse coils, energy will be lead into the system.  The cylinder containing permanent magnets will rotate faster and faster.  This will destroy the synchronization between the rotational speed and the pulse rate.Thus energy must be drawn out from the system.  One technique is via the collector coils.

Another technique is via the rotating axle.

In both the Newman and the Bedini systems, there is not much program control.  Handling varying torque or external load will be difficult.  They are also limited by the use of the same coil as the pulse coil and the collector coil.

The 225 HP Pulse Motor has program control.  The electromagnetic coils can be programmed to become pulse coils or collector coils.  That explains its much higher efficiency.

exnihiloest

Quote from: Top Gun on August 25, 2008, 09:12:01 PM
Please note that the magnetic ball c is made to rotate faster via the action of the electromagnetic coils.  With the extract supply of energy, the system cannot be closed.

The power supply to be inboard or not doesn't change anything and is irrelevant to the context, as no force is supposed to applied from the outside.

Quote
In addition, there is a net attractive magnetic force from the action of the electromagnetic coils attracting the mganetic ball towards the center - the required centripetal force to keep the magnetic ball c from flying away.

That's what I meant, the point you miss being that this is true only for each complete turn but releasing the ball lets the net attractive magnetic force be no more towards the center but opposing the effect of hitting e.

Quote
The physics described here cannot be wrong.  I shall describe the pulsing circuit in a separate post.

Only the kinetic energy of the ball hitting e is considered but not the breaking of the centripetal force when the ball is released: to integrate it on one turn shows it is an opposing effect.
The physics described here is not wrong. It is incomplete.