The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[ltseung888]

More comments on the pumping of 4,000RMB within the next two years by China into its economy.

When all cental banks pump 'number in trusted financial institutions' into their economies, China must follow the practice.

If not, the Chinese Currency (RMB) will rapidly rise in value compared with other currencies.  Export will come to a dead stop.

However, China must increase its meaningful economic activities in step with the increase.  Introducing the lead-out-energy machines and the flying saucers are very meaningful.

[TinselKoala]

I believe you mentioned that you would gladly do the necessary experiments.

Do experiment001 and you have the start of the many answers.

Is there something wrong with your comprehension of the English language?

This experiment has been done many times, by me, and by many others in the reactionless propulsion community. The fact that it may move in one direction or another is COMPLETELY explained by a correct kinematic analysis. IT WILL NOT HOVER without "bouncing" off a substrate.
What does this have to do with the LTLOT? You have failed to answer this question.
What scientific hypotheses does the LTLOT make? You have not even stated a single one.

I said I would gladly do experiments that addressed a scientific hypothesis of the correct form: "If and only if the LTLOT is correct, an apparatus designed thus and so, will perform A, B, and/or C" .  You have not specified a scientific hypothesis. You have ignored analyses of apparatus that you have posted. You have displayed profound ignorance of standard physics, statics, and dynamics with your inane "force pendulum" gravitational lead-out silliness.

So don't come back with your silly challenges to me to perform a useless and pointless tinkerer's "experiment" that can prove nothing at all. Rather, go back and read my posts and address the points I make. Or don't, that's up to you.

[chrisC]

Is there something wrong with your comprehension of the English language?

This experiment has been done many times, by me, and by many others in the reactionless propulsion community. The fact that it may move in one direction or another is COMPLETELY explained by a correct kinematic analysis. IT WILL NOT HOVER without "bouncing" off a substrate.
What does this have to do with the LTLOT? You have failed to answer this question.
What scientific hypotheses does the LTLOT make? You have not even stated a single one.

I said I would gladly do experiments that addressed a scientific hypothesis of the correct form: "If and only if the LTLOT is correct, an apparatus designed thus and so, will perform A, B, and/or C" .  You have not specified a scientific hypothesis. You have ignored analyses of apparatus that you have posted. You have displayed profound ignorance of standard physics, statics, and dynamics with your inane "force pendulum" gravitational lead-out silliness.

So don't come back with your silly challenges to me to perform a useless and pointless tinkerer's "experiment" that can prove nothing at all. Rather, go back and read my posts and address the points I make. Or don't, that's up to you.

@TinselKoala

People on this Forum respect your inputs and critical analysis & explanations and I myself certainly thank you for your participation in trying to make Lawrence understand the need to verify postulates.

Others like Bill and Unitarian tried to help Lawrence do the right thing but finally concluded he had ulterior motives in trying to scam investors.

I myself gave up a long time ago and use this thread instead for my morning laughter and to keep others from falling into the snake oil salesman's pitch. Thank you again.

cheers
chrisC

[TinselKoala]

Thanks Chris and Pirate for the kind words.

I dug up a couple of photos of some apparatus that was used around here to test some of the claims and proposals that have been discussed here as being relevant to the LTLOT.

Here's a force pendulum that was used to examine the dynamics of a pendulum system as outlined in the "book":


Another picture, showing one of the reaction tester sleds, showing its general configuration and the tiny nozzle for the firecracker fuze:

and here's the sliding weight and the cushioning spring from inside the sled:


These are just items that we have in storage that I could find with a casual search around the lab. I don't really care if anyone believes me or not, but there is a lot more apparatus like this, using compressed air, electromagnets, permanent magnets, chemical rockets, firecrackers, and other stuff. There are pendula, wheels, sliding and pivoting weights, magnets, liquid chambers and tubes, RF exciters, microwave waveguides, you name it. This research has already been done!!

[utilitarian]

My improvement on the hare-brained intertia propulsion theory.  Let's see if lawrence includes it in the books!

Forget the pads, just redirect the path of the ball for greater efficiency!