Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

Started by ltseung888, July 20, 2007, 02:43:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 103 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

The LT Solenoid # 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IdfVIYFGlM

The video speaks for itself, I think.

Anticipating somebody coming up and saying, "But look, it's rocking a little bit, just use stronger pulses!" I will explain: in the first place, it is the center of mass of the system that does not move. When the magnet shoots right, the tube and coil move left, not as far because they are much heavier. In the second place, the suspension (the coiled feed wires) act to couple the teeter-totter rocking and the up-and-down springlike bouncing into a slight nutation, and you see these two effects as a tiny side-to-side motion from the camera's perspective.

It is totally implausible that a system like this could provide lift, propulsion or maneuvering capability to a "flying saucer" as alleged above.
Although I notice we can't actually seem to get anyone to actually claim that the saucer is actually so provided.

Now, ltseung, this didn't take as long as I anticipated. Let's call it an even hundred US dollars, and forget the lunch, thank you very much. You may achieve payment in the following manner: Find your nearest community pet spay-neuter program, or no-kill animal shelter, and make a donation in the name of "Isaac Newton" for one hundred dollars US. Get a receipt, photograph it and post it where I can see it.

The Scientific Method Leads-Out progress and creativity, when properly applied.

ltseung888

It does not need a crystal ball to see the following:

(1)   Large influx of US dollars into Countries with guarantee of deposits with no upper limit.
(2)   There will be purchases of assets of real value.  The price of such items will go up and inflation is likely. 
(3)   The traditional technique of raising interest rates to curb inflation will not work as the holder of US dollars do not need to borrow.
(4)   There will be closed-door meetings with these US dollar holders.  These individuals or groups do not like their identities revealed.  However, there will be rumors and confirmable reports.
(5)   Individual Countries such as China, India etc. will seek a new financial order.  Politically, they cannot be seen as subjected to the wishes of a group of faceless foreigners.
Compressible Fluids are Mechanical Energy Carriers. Air is not a fuel but is an energy carrier. (See reply 1097)
Gravitational or Electron Motion Energy can be Lead Out via oscillation, vibration, rotation or flux change systems.  We need to apply pulse force (Lee-Tseung Pulls) at the right time. (See reply 1106 and 2621)
1150 describes the Flying Saucer.  This will provide incredible prosperity.  Beware of the potential destructive powers.

ltseung888

Quote from: TinselKoala on November 21, 2008, 07:28:06 PM
The LT Solenoid # 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IdfVIYFGlM

The video speaks for itself, I think.

Now, ltseung, this didn't take as long as I anticipated. Let's call it an even hundred US dollars, and forget the lunch, thank you very much. You may achieve payment in the following manner: Find your nearest community pet spay-neuter program, or no-kill animal shelter, and make a donation in the name of "Isaac Newton" for one hundred dollars US. Get a receipt, photograph it and post it where I can see it.

The Scientific Method Leads-Out progress and creativity, when properly applied.

Please put a hard stop in the middle of the tube so that you have effectively two separate tubes.  Or use two physically different tubes joined at the middle.

You will then be able to have the two magnets repelled in opposite directions.

I shall arrange for "Isaac Newton" to make the donations.  But please do the right Experiment001!
Compressible Fluids are Mechanical Energy Carriers. Air is not a fuel but is an energy carrier. (See reply 1097)
Gravitational or Electron Motion Energy can be Lead Out via oscillation, vibration, rotation or flux change systems.  We need to apply pulse force (Lee-Tseung Pulls) at the right time. (See reply 1106 and 2621)
1150 describes the Flying Saucer.  This will provide incredible prosperity.  Beware of the potential destructive powers.

TinselKoala

Re the hard stop in the middle of the tube: OK, I'll try it, but it won't make any difference in the results. As I have explained, the motion of two magnets moving in opposite directions simultaneously will DECREASE any tendency for the device to move, not increase it. This is because, once again, momentum is conserved. It is not logical to believe that the case that I have shown, with only a single moving magnet stack, would have less tendency to move than the MORE SYMMETRICAL arrangement that you are suggesting.

Plus, I doubt that I will be able to make the magnets separate as you have suggested--the various experiments I did (not shown) in preparation for the above demonstration pretty much convinced me of that. But if someone shows me otherwise, I will be most interested. Shows me, not tells me.

You didn't complain about  the single magnet in the Chinese video you posted as evidence of your theory earlier in the thread. Why? Because you believed then that that experiment supported your hypothesis, when in fact I have shown that it does not. So now, of course, you have objections.


Pirate88179

@ TinselKoala:

Nice work!  We can tell that you know what you are doing.  Great idea for the donation, especially the Newton part.  Very good cause also.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen