The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[chrisC]

I have a question.  Why are you making it so needlessly complex, if you claim it is so simple.  Why even have the bottom half of the device?  Just pound the ball upwards, and you will not need to "dampen" or "dissipate" anything on the bottom end.  Makes about as much sense as anything else you have written.

Yes, I was thinking about the same too? If a high school kid and her team can replicate this great world shattering discovery, what were the rest of the scientific community thinking. Maybe they all had too much turkey.

Talking about turkeys, I was listening to a news report a few days ago about whether there is any truth about turkeys being literally stupid. So, I found out something I didn't already know about turkeys. If turkeys were out in the open and it started to rain, the turkeys must be herded in otherwise they will just stand out in the rain! So what does the rain do to them? Well, they don't know how to flap their wings to dry themselves and eventually the moisture under their features gives them pneumonia and they die!!

So,what does this have to do with Tseung? Well, Tseung does exhibit similar behavior like those turkeys. He just doesn't get it! 

I wish everyone had a good turkey day, including Lawrence of course.

cheers
chrisC

[Top Gun]

I have a question.  Why are you making it so needlessly complex, if you claim it is so simple?  Why even has the bottom half of the device?  Just pound the ball upwards, and you will not need to "dampen" or "dissipate" anything on the bottom end.  Makes about as much sense as anything else you have written.

Experiment001 is a direct conceptual verification of the flying saucer diagram Flying_Saucer001.  Some people have the misconception that there is no way to generate internal forces in a closed system.  The idea of a propulsion system using unbalanced forces generated from within is against the Third Law of Newton (Action = Reaction).

The Ms. Forever Yuen remote control car videos on youtube and the specific Experiment001 is aimed to prove conclusively that we can indeed generate internal forces in a closed system to influence the motion of the closed system.

Please compare Flying_Saucer001 and Experiment001 diagrams.

*** You idea of simplifying the bottom half indeed works.  The following youtube video already demonstrated it.  The device uses unbalanced oscillation to produce the unbalanced force.
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=anYxNitcrm0 ***

The race to produce the actual practical flying saucer is on â€" the theory is clearly revealed now.

[Pirate88179]

Nice video.  The only reason it can move is because it is pushing off against the table.  There are no tables in space. (That I know of)  If that device were suspended in the air, there would be no movement at all.

Bill

[TinselKoala]

Now do the control experiment.
Find a smooth flat level surface. I use a granite surface plate, but you can use that table if it's level.
Get a handful of marbles or bearing balls, all smooth and the same size. Put them down on the level surface.
Get a sheet of glass, or plastic, like from a picture frame. Set it down on top of the marbles.

Now put that same device, shown in the video, down on the glass. Actuate the device.

Report what happens.
Or better yet, video it and let us see it.

Here's the hypothesis: IF Newton is correct, and every action has an equal and opposite reaction, the device shown will move in one direction and THE GLASS PLATE will MOVE IN THE OTHER DIRECTION, and the center of mass of the system formed by the plate and the device, will stay in the same place.
If, on the other hand, the LTLOT is true and REACTIONLESS forces can be generated, the device will move exactly as it does in the above video, but the glass plate will remain motionless. After all, ex hypothesi, nothing is pushing on the plate, is it?

Please note: This is a well-specified, testable, potentially falsifiable hypothesis. Science proceeds by making and testing such hypotheses, not by fooling around with toy cars in boxes.

I, for one, am eagerly awaiting the results of this control experiment.

[Top Gun]

Now do the control experiment.
Find a smooth flat level surface. I use a granite surface plate, but you can use that table if it's level.
Get a handful of marbles or bearing balls, all smooth and the same size. Put them down on the level surface.
Get a sheet of glass, or plastic, like from a picture frame. Set it down on top of the marbles.

Now put that same device, shown in the video, down on the glass. Actuate the device.

Report what happens.
Or better yet, video it and let us see it.

Here's the hypothesis: IF Newton is correct, and every action has an equal and opposite reaction, the device shown will move in one direction and THE GLASS PLATE will MOVE IN THE OTHER DIRECTION, and the center of mass of the system formed by the plate and the device, will stay in the same place.
If, on the other hand, the LTLOT is true and REACTIONLESS forces can be generated, the device will move exactly as it does in the above video, but the glass plate will remain motionless. After all, ex hypothesi, nothing is pushing on the plate, is it?

Please note: This is a well-specified, testable, potentially falsifiable hypothesis. Science proceeds by making and testing such hypotheses, not by fooling around with toy cars in boxes.

I, for one, am eagerly awaiting the results of this control experiment.

Let us get Ms. Forever Yuen and team to do the remote control car experiment on top of a smooth glass plate with marbles underneath.  She can show the new video.  I would expect much more movement of the remote control car in a box than the glass plate.