Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

Started by ltseung888, July 20, 2007, 02:43:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 64 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 711 712 713 714 715 ... 1075
User actions

TinselKoala

#3560
December 04, 2008, 02:48:35 PM
I think it's pretty funny that TopGun and LTseung rely on conservation of momentum principles to try to prove a system that violates conservation of momentum!!
You just can't have it both ways. If it is possible to violate conservation of momentum, the explanation about force being the rate of change of momentum is senseless. On the other hand, if conservation of momentum is inviolable, the device cannot work because it doesn't conserve momentum.

Devil

#3561
December 04, 2008, 05:32:53 PM
Quote from: TinselKoala on December 04, 2008, 02:48:35 PM
I think it's pretty funny that TopGun and LTseung rely on conservation of momentum principles to try to prove a system that violates conservation of momentum!!
You just can't have it both ways. If it is possible to violate conservation of momentum, the explanation about force being the rate of change of momentum is senseless. On the other hand, if conservation of momentum is inviolable, the device cannot work because it doesn't conserve momentum.


TinselKolala, from your posts, it is clear that you do not have a formal education in Physics.  Much of your knowledge is hands-on.

It is like discussing the works of William Shakespeare with a person who has not studied English but picked up some English in selling goods to English Customers.

Tseung should keep ignoring the irrelevant and insulting posts.  He cannot bring himself down to the level of explaining elementary physics.

Top Gun can try to teach elementary physics on an open forum where the students do not need to learn and pass examinations.  He has a hopeless task.  But if he has fun and enjoys displaying his patience, he is welcome to engage in such conversations.

Those who refuse to recite the prayers to me in this life are welcome to come to my home and spend eternity reciting them in their next life.  I shall even teach them some physics in a very, very warm environment.
Do not worry about the insults and jeers.  Let them recite the following 666 times.

(1) The Lead-out-energy from a horizontally pulled pendulum is equal to the vertical component of the tension times the vertical displacement.
(2) An unbalanced force can be generated from a closed system.  Secondary events using unequal exchanges of energy and momentum are used.
(3) The electromagnetic Coil can be a magnet, a collision mechanism and an electricity exchange mechanism.

TinselKoala

#3562
December 04, 2008, 06:22:57 PM
And Devil, it is clear from your posts that you don't really know WTF you are talking about, and just want to joke around.
Please provide evidence from my posts that I have not had a formal education in physics. Have I made an error somewhere?
Please point it out, and we will discuss it.
You, on the other hand, have made some errors. Claiming to have a handle on eternity is one of them.

hansvonlieven

#3563
December 04, 2008, 06:29:00 PM
Quote from: Devil on December 04, 2008, 05:32:53 PM
Those who refuse to recite the prayers to me in this life are welcome to come to my home and spend eternity reciting them in their next life.  I shall even teach them some physics in a very, very warm environment.


Then you better learn some physics first. Start with inclined planes and levers, after that perhaps some pendulum physics.

Hans von Lieven
When all is said and done, more is said than done.     Groucho Marx

chrisC

#3564
December 04, 2008, 06:38:32 PM
Quote from: TinselKoala on December 04, 2008, 02:48:35 PM
I think it's pretty funny that TopGun and LTseung rely on conservation of momentum principles to try to prove a system that violates conservation of momentum!!
You just can't have it both ways. If it is possible to violate conservation of momentum, the explanation about force being the rate of change of momentum is senseless. On the other hand, if conservation of momentum is inviolable, the device cannot work because it doesn't conserve momentum.


If Tseung really understood Physics, we wouldn't all be in this comedy show!

maybe it was Psychic he studied. That's why he confused himself about the Physics; even pretended to be the Devil!

Now, it's becoming clear at least to me.

cheers
chrisC
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 711 712 713 714 715 ... 1075
User actions