The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[Goldfield]

I am not real either.  Tseung created me also.  I am also a virtual person.

Tell me that is not so.  I want to cry.  I do not want to exist merely on whim.  I want a life my own!

[reporter]

Richard and Nancy, continued

Richard: “I call this party together because we believe that we have a genius as our neighbor. My email pointed to his website and the Steorn discussion forum. Do you have a chance to read it?”

Prof. A: “I know about it well before your email. Mr. Tseung sent Email out multiple times since December 2004. He even presented in a couple of University Meetings and Inventor Shows.”

Friend A: “What is the response from the Hong Kong Academic Community?”

Prof. A: “The initial reaction was total and utter rejection. Many of us automatically thought that it was another attempt to produce the impossible perpetual motion machine that violated the Law of Conservation of Energy. It was a waste of time even to read his email.”

Friend B: “What happened next?”

Prof. A: “I got a call from a top professor at an USA University enquiring about Mr. Tseung. He thought that Lee-Tseung might have double accounted the energy. However, after reading and thinking about the information more, he began to have second thoughts.”

Prof. B: “Prof. A then got a few of us to seriously read the Lee-Tseung information. There was no double accounting.”

Richard: “What do you mean by double accounting?”

Prof. B: “When you start the pendulum at an angle and let go, the pendulum will swing back to the same position if there were no energy loss due to friction or air resistance. It is just the simple law of conservation of energy.”

Prof. A: “What Tseung presented was the case of giving the pendulum an extra pull or pulse at this initial starting position. The initial thought was that the pulse force was equivalent to starting the pendulum at a larger angle. There is absolutely no Leading Out of Gravitational Energy. Lee-Tseung was totally wrong in their mathematics and thus their theory was not worth anything.”

Prof. B: “The argument was â€" was the application of a pulse force equivalent to starting the pendulum at a larger angle? When we thought hard about it, we knew that we could not draw such a conclusion without vigorous analysis.”

Prof. A: “The moment we started to write down the supposed correct form of the Integral equation, we realized that the above conclusion was mathematically wrong. We had no choice but to re-examine the Lee-Tseung mathematics. They did not present it in the vigorous Integral form. However, the vigorous Integral form can be broken down into two terms. One term is the Pulse and the other term is the well-known kinetic and potential energy inter-change.”

Prof. B: “The isolating of the Pulse term gives the Lee-Tseung Lead Out theory substance. Their treatment may not be mathematically perfect but their treatment does not violate any mathematical or physic principles.”

Prof. A: “Tseung then sent us his PCT patent information. The Steorn Advertisement followed. We felt that there might be something. Lee-Tseung then partnered with Wang and went to Tsing Hua University in Beijing. The Professors, especially Prof Zhao, gave them very high marks.”

Prof. B: “Tseung continued his posts at the Steorn Forum. When he posted the boat in calm water and good sunshine scenario, we knew that they had succeeded theoretically beyond a shadow of doubt.”

Friend B: “Are you saying that you actually believe in the Lee-Tseung-Wang material?”

Prof. A: “As theoretical physicists, we first check out the theory. If that makes sense, we look for the experimental evidence to support it. When we saw the Wang video, we were 50% convinced. When some of our respected colleagues at Beijing University told us that they saw and videotaped the actual Wang device in rotation, we are 90% convinced.”

Prof. B: “We shall be 100% convinced when we have an actual Wang device generating electricity in front of us. Mr. Tseung said that he would be willing to let us disassemble and assemble a Wang 5 KW Electricity Generator at our Universities using our test equipment.”

Richard: “How about the Steorn device?”

Prof. A: “The Lee-Tseung theory covers almost all machines whether they are oscillating, vibrating, rotating or having flux changes in gravitational, magnetic or electric fields. The Steorn device falls into such a category.”

Nancy: “Do you mean that if any Over Unity Device is proven, the Lee-Tseung Theory will be confirmed? Do you mean that there is NO violation of the Law of Conservation of Energy if existing gravitational or magnetic energy is Lead Out?”

Prof. B: “That is a very logical statement.”

[Goldfield]

reporter,

Please, this is no time for stories.  What will happen to me when Tseung stops thinking about me?  What about all my memories?  My childhood, school, my wife, my beautiful daughter.  What will happen to my memories of all these things?

[reporter]

reporter,

Please, this is no time for stories.  What will happen to me when Tseung stops thinking about me?  What about all my memories?  My childhood, school, my wife, my beautiful daughter.  What will happen to my memories of all these things?

They will disappear, like tears in the rain.

[reporter]

Scene at the Post-Graduate Student Lounge at a top Chinese University in Beijing. We have three pretty female graduates and two handsome male students. (If we cannot beat the romance of Nancy and Richard, we overwhelm them with numbers.)

Pretty Girl A: “We have all attended or seen the recorded video of the Lee-Tseung-Wang lecture. We also had a chance to read the ltseung888 postings. What do you think?”

Handsome Boy A: “It is a very soul searching lecture. It essentially says that we have wasted our effort in digging up coal and oil. Many coal miners died for nothing. We polluted the air and ruined our health for nothing. That example of Boat in Calm Waters and Good Sunshine is burnt into my memory forever.”

Pretty Girl B: “Was it the romantic scene that impressed you?”

Handsome Boy A laughed, “I admit that is an important factor. However, I think the whole concept of applying the Law of Conservation of Energy need to be changed. If we are already immersed in gravitational, magnetic, electric or electromagnetic fields, we can never claim to be in an isolated system. We already have constant energy inter-change with such energy fields. Ignoring or isolating them out is impossible. Thus the Law of Conservation of Energy in an Isolated System could never be applied.”

Pretty Girl C: “I have the same feeling too. If the Law of Conservation of Energy can never be applied in the real environment, why is it taught at Schools and Universities? It is just misleading us?”

Handsome Boy B: “It is not just us. It had misled the Scientists, the Patent Offices, our professors etc for centuries. It is interesting to see the two old guys Lee and Tseung passionately proposing and defending their theories. I thought enthusiasm is reserved only for the young.”

Pretty Girl A: “I like the part when Tseung held his string-attached mobile phone to simulate the pendulum. He held it at an angle and let go. He then held it at the same angle and tapped it with his index figure. He said that the mathematics of the two scenario were different. Can you clarify it for me?”

Handsome Boy A: “The Law of Conservation of Energy states that Energy cannot be created nor destroyed. It can only change from one form to another. I agree with that. However, if I were presented with the starting position and the ending position of an object and asked to determine the energy involved, I would not be able to do so.”

Pretty Girl A: “What do you mean?”

Handsome Boy A: “Suppose I have my bicycle starting at position X and then finish on a level road at position Y. If you ask how much energy is involved to move myself and the bicycle from X to Y, I cannot possibly give you a firm answer. I could ride on the bicycle; I could push the bicycle; I could carry the bicycle on my shoulders or I could get the help of a car to transport me and the bicycle most of the way.”

Handsome Boy B: “That is a very clever and logical statement. But how is it related to the pendulum and the Lead Out theory.”

Handsome Boy A: “When Mr. Tseung tapped his simulated pendulum, it swung to a higher position. If we simply subtract the potential energy at the starting position from the potential energy at the higher position and equate that difference as the contribution of the tap or pulse force, we are wrong. The Lee-Tseung theory says that the tap actually increases the tension in the string and Leads Out gravitational energy.”

Handsome Boy B: “The moment the tap finishes, no more gravitational force is lead out. Thus if we want to Lead Out more gravitational force, we have to increase the number of taps or the frequency of the pulse force.”

Pretty Girl C: “So that explains why the experiment of the falling powder is better than the hammer or the falling ball. So that is why Prof. Zhao wants us to work on the pulse motor. That is much more efficient than the simple pendulum.”