The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

[critic]

Dear Mr. Tseung.

Congratulation to you and team on the brilliant proof-of-concept experiments for the Flying Saucer.  I am sure that the triple confirmation results will be positive.  None of your Experiments stated in your mini-workshop are beyond the capability of the average secondary school physics laboratory.

However, the conclusion that one can generate unbalanced force from within a closed system is world-shaking.  The man-made flying saucer is now reality - both theoretically and experimentally.

I have to admit that I did not buy your assumption that the USA or Chinese Military have developed some versions of the flying saucer previously.  Now my opinion has changed.  They may not have your theory or exact prototype but they must have stumbled on the experimental results of Coil and Magnet interactions.

You already have the lead-out-energy theory.  You pointed out the possibility that the Newman, Bedini, Adams or the 225 HP pulse motor were not hoaxes.  Dr. Raymond Ting and Mr. Tong Po Chi have demonstrated their experimental geniuses.  Do you think that you and your team can perform the miracle again?  Can your team develop a working lead-out-energy proof-of-concept prototype for the World?

[Top Gun]

Dear Mr. Tseung,

I was think of ways to improve the experiments.  Will the attached picture be a candidate to consider?

[hansvonlieven]

Dear Mr. Tseung,

I was think of ways to improve the experiments.  Will the attached picture be a candidate to consider?

Top Dork,

Pinching my suggestions now and passing them off as your own?

On Jan. 19th (Page 373) I wrote:

G'day Lawrence,

I don't think your device will work as planned, but I respect your determination to try your idea.

What puzzles me is why you are so intent on using a permanent magnet and an electromagnet. Wouldn't you be better off to use two electromagnets instead? You could fire them with the same pulse and have much more control over the whole contraption. Far more energy efficient too.

Take a moment to think about it.

Hans von Lieven

Sound familiar?

Hans von Lieven

[utilitarian]

Top Dork,

Pinching my suggestions now and passing them off as your own.

On Jan. 19th (Page 373) I wrote:

G'day Lawrence,

I don't think your device will work as planned, but I respect your determination to try your idea.

What puzzles me is why you are so intent on using a permanent magnet and an electromagnet. Wouldn't you be better off to use two electromagnets instead? You could fire them with the same pulse and have much more control over the whole contraption. Far more energy efficient too.

Take a moment to think about it.

Hans von Lieven

Sound familiar?

Hans von Lieven

Your seeds have fallen on fertile soil.

[Top Gun]

Top Dork,

Pinching my suggestions now and passing them off as your own?

On Jan. 19th (Page 373) I wrote:

G'day Lawrence,

I don't think your device will work as planned, but I respect your determination to try your idea.

What puzzles me is why you are so intent on using a permanent magnet and an electromagnet. Wouldn't you be better off to use two electromagnets instead? You could fire them with the same pulse and have much more control over the whole contraption. Far more energy efficient too.

Take a moment to think about it.

Hans von Lieven

Sound familiar?

Hans von Lieven

Dear Hans,

Thank you for your suggestion.  The fault is with your first statement I don't think your device will work as planned.  Tseung et al were focusing on their experiments and ignored all "disagree" comments.

Now the experiments are successful, they can explore other suggestions.  Yours is a good one to explore.

Are you a believer now?  Please set up some coils to do the mentioned experiments and improve them using your suggestion.  Validation from a previous non-believer is more convincing.